Quoted:
Interesting cimmense under that story
I saw those
cimmense comments as well. Lots of criticism over the harshness of the sentence, and to be fair five years for what amounts to doing a bit of wood and metal work does seem excessive.
He certainly didn't seem to have any criminal intent . OK he was a bit naughty and shouldn't thave done it but 5 years (at the taxpayers expense (Really???)
I believe he should have recieved a two years suspended sentence, had his "toys" seized and told not to do it again or it would be a 5 year custodial next time.
The guy doesn't appear to have any intent to use the guns for criminal purposes so what risk did he pose in real terms? There's a big difference between a law abiding collector who falls foul of a legal techincality, or an hobby engineer who builds some woodern contraption that looks like a gun and some scrumbag street hoodlum who has a (working) gun purely for criminal intent.
When you think that some little shits with criminal records as long as their arm are receiving less than 3 years for burning down homes and businesses and looting in the London Riots it really makes a mockery of the system and shows how utterly stupid and pathetic our fear of national fear of firearms really is.
What a joke.