Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 9/9/2004 8:27:59 AM EST
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 8:45:53 AM EST
Everything in life is 50/50....


you do or you dont......

It is, or it is not....

It will, or it will not....
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 12:30:24 PM EST
Because of the state's Constutition, about zero.

SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.
The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this Section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 1:47:51 PM EST
Here is Oregon, with the inititive ballot process, I believe that AW could be easily
banned if the AWB was put on the ballot. To many GD liberals in the PNW these
days.

In Portland, these liberal turds look at you funny if you mention hunting, fishing or
shooting. This was not the case 20+ years ago.

Spambo
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 2:23:12 PM EST

Originally Posted By KA3B:
Because of the state's Constutition, about zero.

SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.
The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this Section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.



That didn't work for th full-auto stuff now did it?

Link Posted: 9/9/2004 2:48:38 PM EST

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:

Originally Posted By KA3B:
Because of the state's Constutition, about zero.

SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.
The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this Section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.



That didn't work for th full-auto stuff now did it?




Got to stand for something or you will fall for anything........
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 4:54:48 PM EST
[Last Edit: 9/9/2004 4:55:42 PM EST by Boom_Stick]

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:

Originally Posted By KA3B:
Because of the state's Constutition, about zero.

SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.
The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this Section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.



That didn't work for th full-auto stuff now did it?




Or the SBR, however both the SBR ban and the FA ban had federal companion laws. The federal AWB is sinking so I dont think an AWB would make it through.
The states that have an AWB dont have anyhting close to our ARTICLE I SECTION 24 in their state constutition.
Link Posted: 9/10/2004 5:12:24 AM EST
That's what happens when "you guys" allowed it to pass.
If it came up for a vote right now it would not pass.
I think Joe Waldron said it was a machine gun/SBR/SBS ban over a complete machine gun/ awwault weapons ban.

Quit tossing in the truth you mean ole republican you!




Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:

That didn't work for th full-auto stuff now did it?


Link Posted: 9/10/2004 6:55:17 AM EST
I think the chances of a Washington state AWB are very slim, but that doesn't mean we don't have to be vigilant and try to keep gun friendly politicians in office. I certainly wouldn't count on the state consitution alone to keep an AWB from being enacted.
Top Top