Quoted: The frustrating thing is that the Stryker (more-or-less) fills a need Army has been trying to fill for 26 years, at least--they (we) were trying to field a combat vehicle that would fit between the Light Infantry LPCs (Leather Personnel Carriers) and tanks/APCs when I was in BTC. The money was never there. It was not foreseen that RPGs would be such a big deal on the battlefield. People with no imagination always kvetch because "No one forsaw this!" Well, did you? Sometimes the complaints are legitimate, sometimes they are stupid, and sometimes they are based on a lack of information and/or understanding. And sometimes they are just narrow-minded, mean-spirited sniping at people and organizations the whiners neither understand nor like... |
The NVA shit-canned M-48s & M-60 tanks and M-113 APCs all over Vietnam with RPGs. Hundreds, if not thousands. We knew they were a problem in the sixties. We all wanted them, since LAWS had a 40% failure rate.
In 1967, the Israelis captured buttloads of RPGs and issued them to their troops. They killed shitloads of arab tanks and APCs with them.
When the Bradley was developed, the Air Force insisted that the Army test a combat loaded Bradley against an RPG (the Army had avoided that test!). It burned and blew the fuck up. That is how they got stuck with the slab armor.
The solution for the RPG was Chobham armor. It worked, but then the Russians built newer standoff warheads, so the Army had to upgrade to DU armor.
They knew....they knew....