Well, he did it again !!!!! This was the letter I sent in response to his first reply:
"Dear Sir, I previously contacted you with my concerns of the violations of Constitutional Rights of the victims of hurricane Katrina. I specifically addressed the 2nd Admendment issue, and how the confiscation of legally owned firearms was a violation of that right.
Under the declaration of a federal Disaster, Louisanna State law affords the state the right to "control and regulate" firearms. It DOES NOT afford the state the right to confiscate said firearms in direct violation of the 2nd Admendment. The reply I recieved from you was what I consider a form letter in regards to relief efforts, and did not address my concern at all. I do not appreciate your skirting the issue. I asked for a specific response to a specific issue. Regardless of your stance on 2nd Admendment issues, you took an oath to defend the Constitution, including the 2nd Admendment, dispite your personal feelings on the issue. At this point in time, the 2nd Admendment is law, and I would appreciate a specific response on your position of what is happening in Louisanna in regard to the afoememtioned 2 Admendment issue. I await your response."
Would you believe I got a second self serving reply, telling me all about his involvement with the relief efforts? As a matter of fact, it's the same "form" letter I got the first time!!!! Which part of answering a direct, subject specific question doesn't he (his staff) understand?? I know the man is a gun grabbing asshat, but this is going beyond the 2nd Admendment issue in LA. This is now an issue of a US Senator refusing to communicate with the very people who put him in office and pay him.
I'm continuing to hound his office just because he won't answer my question.