Quoted: Might as well have full on gun registration by your logic.
If you were asking for things required BY LAW it wouldn't be an issue. You are going well beyond that.
And what is all this nonsense about ambulance chasers? How is having a reciept vs. saying "yes I sold it, I don't remember who it was, and I'm not legally required to have that information." going to be any different? |
Huh?!? Do you mean to argue that because I want proof that I am no longer personally in possession of a particular firearm myself, that I therefore advocate full gun registration??? Wow, man. That’s a pretty incredible leap of “logic”. It’s also a
straw man argument, since I did not say nor even hint that I support full gun registration. Can you explain how – as a private citizen wanting a purchaser of one of my firearms to sign a bill of sale proving that I am selling the rifle – that is the same thing as me reporting that sale to the government for tracking purposes?!? Especially considering that no one aside from me is ever going to see that bill of sale, unless I get sued? (In which case I would have been very smart for getting that bill of sale in the first place.) Seriously WS4...you’re confusing two very different issues here.
WS4, have you ever been to a grocery store after they mopped the floor? Did you see a yellow cone that said something like, “Floor is wet and slippery. Use Caution”. Tell me why you think they put that cone there? They certainly aren’t required by law to do so. So then why do they? I’ll tell you why: Because if they DON’T put the cone there, and somebody falls and bust their ass, guess what happens? That’s right: Lawsuit! Likewise, you’re right…I am not required by law to collect a bill of sale when I sell a rifle. But as I explained to you in my previous post, not collecting a bill of sale can very much be like mopping the grocery store floor and not leaving a warning cone in place. You don’t HAVE to do it…but you will increase your chances of getting sued if you don’t, and something unexpected happens. I already explained all of this to you in my previous post.
As for your last comment…I’m just going to assume you’ve never been on the receiving end of a good plaintiff’s lawyer as he tries to paint you as being the anti-Christ in front of a jury. And in this regard, you’re confusing the criminal implications with the civil implications. From a criminal law perspective, you’d be right…there would be no difference between having the bill of sale and simply saying that you sold it. But from a civil law perspective, a good ambulance chasing attorney would convince a jury (and easily so) that because you didn’t make an effort to determine the legality of the purchase, and even though you weren’t required to by law, you were nonetheless reckless, careless, woefully negligent, operating regardless of concerns for public safety…and moreover that you steal money from the church collection plate, you take ice cream away from kids on hot summer days, you rip the heads off of little girls’ Barbie dolls, and you push old people down the stairs in their wheelchairs! In other words, a good attorney will be able to paint you as the most evil person to ever walk the face of the earth…all over what YOU believe to be small matter.
You have no idea how this whole lawsuit shakedown thing works, do you WS4?