Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 1/18/2013 7:32:59 AM EDT
As a Texas resident, I would like the opinions of any MA members on the new legislation. We all know it's terrible, but from what little I've gathered it looks like it's not getting rammed through like the NY legislation. Is there enough actual 2nd amendment support among the politicians that the new version AWB/mag ban has a reasonable chance at not passing? I've seen that breakdown of NRA ratings, but without context it does not mean much.

I ask as an outsider who is very seriously considering the Boston area for the next four years for medical residency training. Unfortunately my preference list is due soon, and once matched it's a binding commitment. I would prefer not to be forced to give everything up should I end up there.

And yes, I have drafted a concise letter urging opposition to the new ban, which I will be sending out widely to MA politicians.
Link Posted: 1/18/2013 10:58:49 AM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
As a Texas resident, I would like the opinions of any MA members on the new legislation. We all know it's terrible, but from what little I've gathered it looks like it's not getting rammed through like the NY legislation. Is there enough actual 2nd amendment support among the politicians that the new version AWB/mag ban has a reasonable chance at not passing? I've seen that breakdown of NRA ratings, but without context it does not mean much.

I ask as an outsider who is very seriously considering the Boston area for the next four years for medical residency training. Unfortunately my preference list is due soon, and once matched it's a binding commitment. I would prefer not to be forced to give everything up should I end up there.

And yes, I have drafted a concise letter urging opposition to the new ban, which I will be sending out widely to MA politicians.


We already have an AWB, any "Assualt Rifle" owned prior to 1994 must be disposed of.  That means that we can keep our neutered AR's that are post 1994.  HOWEVER, this gem of legislature was just filed by Rep "Crazy Ass" Linsky today.  This is BAD.  However, the reps I have spoken with all seem to think the new legislation is a knee jerk reaction and despite being a blue state, I am hopeful that these will not fly as proposed.  Might not even make it out of committee.  Regardless, if you plan on moving here, slam them with phone calls especially the leadership aka Senate President, House Speaker, Senate and House Maj/Min leaders etc.  Also when we find out who is on the Judiciary committee's we need to slam them and their chairman's.  

Rep Linsky's Bill
Link Posted: 1/18/2013 1:04:48 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
As a Texas resident, I would like the opinions of any MA members on the new legislation. We all know it's terrible, but from what little I've gathered it looks like it's not getting rammed through like the NY legislation. Is there enough actual 2nd amendment support among the politicians that the new version AWB/mag ban has a reasonable chance at not passing? I've seen that breakdown of NRA ratings, but without context it does not mean much.

I ask as an outsider who is very seriously considering the Boston area for the next four years for medical residency training. Unfortunately my preference list is due soon, and once matched it's a binding commitment. I would prefer not to be forced to give everything up should I end up there.

And yes, I have drafted a concise letter urging opposition to the new ban, which I will be sending out widely to MA politicians.


Many people, myself included, live in southern NH and commute into MA. If you can schedule yourself to avoid heavy traffic it isn't too bad. I consider the 2 hours spent in my car on work days to be the price of freedom. Is it worth it? Only you can decide for yourself. I say yes.

Link Posted: 1/18/2013 4:36:00 PM EDT
[#3]
I mass emailed the entire legislature (house and senate), and aside from auto-replies, got back this, which is mildly encouraging in this political climate:


Thanks for taking the time to share your opinions with me.  This conversation is certainly in the forefront of everyone’s mind right now and it’s without a doubt that the issue of gun control will take center stage in this legislative session.

At this point I am going to reserve final judgment on any specific issues until I have had the opportunity to fully digest the Governor’s proposal, although it appears that there is little in there that I will like.  As a current gun owner I can assure you that I will be looking out for the rights provided us by the Constitution.

It is unfortunate that this discussion has turned away from ‘violence prevention’ which is the true problem we face, to ‘gun control’ which will only penalize law abiding citizens as criminals will break the law no matter what it is.

Some of the things that I would be open to discussion on, pending the details of course, include background checks, mental health awareness for gun owners, strict enforcement of current laws against straw purchasing and illegal possession, and the closing of potential gun-show loopholes.

On the other hand, I do not support magazine limits, banning of certain weapons, 1-gun a month limits, etc. I believe that those measures only function to penalize the law abiding citizens.

Again, thank you for reaching out to my office and sharing your thoughts on this very important issue.

Best regards,
Peter Durant
State Representative


Knowing nothing else about him, he seems like a good guy. I hope there are enough like him, something to watch carefully.
Link Posted: 1/18/2013 5:31:20 PM EDT
[#4]
Thanks man!
Link Posted: 1/18/2013 10:02:54 PM EDT
[#5]
Bull27 -  am I correct in assuming this statement, "We already have an AWB, any "Assualt Rifle" owned prior to 1994 must be disposed of. That means that we can keep our neutered AR's that are post 1994" refers to new legislation proposed.  Am I correct?

I was under the impression that current MA law allows pre 94 "Assault Weapons" as defined in the 94 federal ban (two features).  Correct?
Link Posted: 1/18/2013 10:28:53 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Bull27 -  am I correct in assuming this statement, "We already have an AWB, any "Assualt Rifle" owned prior to 1994 must be disposed of. That means that we can keep our neutered AR's that are post 1994" refers to new legislation proposed.  Am I correct?

I was under the impression that current MA law allows pre 94 "Assault Weapons" as defined in the 94 federal ban (two features).  Correct?


You are correct.

Link Posted: 1/19/2013 7:15:38 AM EDT
[#7]
http://www.mass.gov/governor/legislationeexecorder/legislation/an-act-to-strengthen-and-enhance-firearms-laws.html

SECTION 6. Said section 121 of chapter 140 of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out, in lines 57-62, the words “a large capacity ammunition feeding device as defined in the federal Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. section 921(a)(31) as appearing in such section on September 13, 1994.” and inserting in place thereof the following words: containing more than seven rounds of ammunition; or (iii) obtained after the effective date of this act and capable of accepting, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than seven rounds of ammunition.




provided, however, that the term assault weapon shall not include: snipped (ii) any weapon that is operated by manual bolt, pump, lever or slide action;





The term “large capacity feeding device” shall not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with,.22 caliber ammunition.



It seems that the 10 round tube mag on a Marlin 1894, among other pistol caliber lever action rifles, would now become a banned "large capacity feeding device". There is an exemption in the definition of "assault weapon", but not "large capacity feeding device". That means no new ones and current owners may not load more than 7 rounds into the tube. Is that correct? Am I missing something?
Link Posted: 1/19/2013 10:18:23 AM EDT
[#8]
You are correct; this is just like NY's law, you can have a 10rd mag, but may only put 7 rounds in it.
So the M1 Garand would be subject to the as well, and probably be considered a "high capacity weapon"
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 4:02:12 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
You are correct; this is just like NY's law, you can have a 10rd mag, but may only put 7 rounds in it.
So the M1 Garand would be subject to the as well, and probably be considered a "high capacity weapon"


did that law pass here in MA already?

Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top