Quoted: It seems like this was crafted very expertly... |
It is in fact quite cunning.
If the dealer doesn't give in, they'll be forced to pay thousands in legal fees and likely go out of business. Bloomberg thinks this is good, as it's supposedly keeping guns out of his fair city. He's not going after places like Bass Pro that have the money and lawyers to fight him. He's going after neighborhood gun shops, small town shops, pawn shops and so on. People who he sees as not having the means to fight back.
The dealer could simply close up shop, giving Bloomberg a double victory: he's stopped guns coming to NYC from a supposedly bad shop, and further he's disarming folks by taking away a neighborhood dealer. Hooray for gun control!
If the dealer gives in, Bloomberg has unfettered access to log data that he couldn't get from the ATF (which may be the real goal of this whole gambit), and oversight over a business that he would rather see out of business to start with. Further, it sets a very nasty precedent that the rest of the members of Bloomberg's coalition of mayors may decide to run with. Suddenly mayors elected locally have the ability to reach across the country and audit the books of a gun shop in another jurisdiction.
The part that keeps getting me is how the initial strategy of setting up a fake straw purchase isn't seen as an illegal act in and of itself. Conspiracy to commit a felony? Attempted felony? Simulated felony? It just doesn't seem right.