Whose fault is it when the gun goes off and injures someone?
POLICE OFFICER SUES GUN STORE AFTER ACCIDENTALLY SHOOTING OFF FINGER
Is this the cop's fault or the store owner's responsibility?
In today's day and age, there's no way this cop is losing the case. A place of business is always liable. Even though the cop might just be
making up for a loss of income
This comment is well said...
"I'm guessing Officer Smith was let go because of this video. He muzzle-swept at least two customers, had his finger inside the trigger guard, didn't check the gun himself to make sure it was unloaded, had his finger on the end of the barrel, and pulled the trigger without making sure the gun was pointed in a safe direction. He's lucky he didn't shoot another customer or the gun store employee. This video illustrates the point that Officer Smith should have have his firearms rights revoked because he's proven he can't exercise them responsibly. In a perfect system, Officer Smith would have to earn back his 2nd Amendment rights and get fined for wasting the court's time with a frivolous lawsuit.
But we don't have a perfect system, and Officer Smith's negligence does not excuse the gun store employee's.He should have removed the magazine and cleared the firearm before he handed it to somebody. Because of this fact, Officer Smith will probably get at least a settlement, and the only people who will really win will be the lawyers."
I wouldn't call it a frivolous lawsuit... He definitely has a case. This is a place of business and they're 100% liable for the fact that someone put a loaded handgun in the case AND the clerk didn't do a common safety check and clear the gun, before handing it to a stranger.