Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 8/20/2005 2:01:55 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/20/2005 2:22:01 PM EDT
dupe-a-roo!
Link Posted: 8/20/2005 5:27:11 PM EDT
Guess they forget the basics....shoot, shovel, shutup.

Paladin
Link Posted: 8/20/2005 5:38:56 PM EDT

Originally Posted By PALADIN-hgwt:
Guess they forget the basics....shoot, shovel, shutup.

Paladin



Again, I am amazed by the ignorance on the subject by folks on the board.

Casey Nethercott, and subsequently his property, were under extensive surveillance by the Fed's, including the diversion of US Border Patrol assets to surveil the ranch, culminating the the arrest of Jack Foote for the posession of a firearm by a prohibited person (Foote had a prior conviction/arrest for Domestic Violence).

Some of you really need to understand what you are talking about before you post.
Link Posted: 8/20/2005 7:49:27 PM EDT
So what, you're saying that someone being charged on an illegal weapons charge should have their property siezed and given to another class of people breaking the law?

Or are you saying that in addition to the weapons charge, the stress of the illegals being held against their will (and fed, kept confortable, and allowed to rest) should constitute this person having their property seized and given to the class of people breaking the law?

To me it seems like both circumstances are FUCKED UP!!!

No illegal should be issued land in America, they are breaking the law to get here. They should be captured, branded, and immediately deported back to Mexico. A second visit over the creek gets them shot. Harsh yes, but I bet it would solve the damn problem.

D
Link Posted: 8/20/2005 8:10:08 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Sader762:
So what, you're saying that someone being charged on an illegal weapons charge should have their property siezed and given to another class of people breaking the law?

Or are you saying that in addition to the weapons charge, the stress of the illegals being held against their will (and fed, kept confortable, and allowed to rest) should constitute this person having their property seized and given to the class of people breaking the law?

To me it seems like both circumstances are FUCKED UP!!!

No illegal should be issued land in America, they are breaking the law to get here. They should be captured, branded, and immediately deported back to Mexico. A second visit over the creek gets them shot. Harsh yes, but I bet it would solve the damn problem.

D



+1
Link Posted: 8/20/2005 8:47:32 PM EDT
[disgust]Undocumented Workers[/disgust]
Link Posted: 8/20/2005 8:55:15 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Sader762:


No illegal should be issued land in America, they are breaking the law to get here. They should be captured, branded, and immediately deported back to Mexico. A second visit over the creek gets them shot. Harsh yes, but I bet it would solve the damn problem.

D



Dear Sir,

If you ever run for office in Texas, I will do everything in my power to get you elected!
Link Posted: 8/20/2005 9:28:51 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/20/2005 10:53:28 PM EDT

Originally Posted By ilikelegs:

Originally Posted By Sader762:
They should be captured, branded, and immediately deported back to Mexico. A second visit over the creek gets them shot. Harsh yes, but I bet it would solve the damn problem.

D




branded!
thats classic



would you use the arfcom brand - you know, the one that has the hidden penis in it?
Link Posted: 8/21/2005 1:29:27 AM EDT

Originally Posted By mikejohnson:

Originally Posted By ilikelegs:

Originally Posted By Sader762:
They should be captured, branded, and immediately deported back to Mexico. A second visit over the creek gets them shot. Harsh yes, but I bet it would solve the damn problem.

D




branded!
thats classic



would you use the arfcom brand - you know, the one that has the hidden penis in it?


LOL Why does everyone keep pretending that it's "hidden"?
Top Top