Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
12/6/2019 7:27:02 PM
Posted: 2/26/2007 8:45:05 PM EST
[Last Edit: 2/26/2007 8:48:14 PM EST by photoman]
In 2005 when the Protection in Lawful Commerce in Arms Act was going through the Senate an amendment was added that would have re authorized the AWB for another 10 years. Feingold voted against the amendment because

I believe that prohibiting certain types of weapons is problematic. I have come to believe that it is a largely arbitrary and symbolic measure.


This was what he had writen back to me in regards to a letter concerning the reauthorization of the AWB and the amendment to the PLCA.

Remind him of why he voted against that amendment to reauthorize the AWB back in 2005 and why he should continue to not support any AWB or reauthorization of the 1994 ban which HR 1022 really isn't as it adds banned by name guns.

Remind him of this every single day.
Link Posted: 2/27/2007 4:38:58 AM EST
Ok like P.M. said hit him hard!
Top Top