Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
10/20/2017 1:01:18 AM
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 8/30/2005 5:14:21 PM EDT
We still wouldn't get to loot anything....
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 5:17:05 PM EDT
Bunny thats true. But 15 feet of water would wash away A LOT of scum.
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 5:17:50 PM EDT

Originally Posted By 1GunnerHogan1:
Bunny thats true. But 15 feet of water would wash away A LOT of scum.



+1
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 5:26:10 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/30/2005 5:27:08 PM EDT by DDofWA]
I'd still be dry. That place could use some cleanin' up.

DD
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 6:04:14 PM EDT
I've got an extra seat in my boat
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 6:06:03 PM EDT
15' of water would run off 15 minutes later. Except for few spots where localized flooding can take place.
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 6:11:30 PM EDT
I live below Spada reservior in skyomish valley, if the big earth quake ever hits, most eveyone in the valley will be purged out to puget sound.

But the survivors would be free to loot as much as they want, as the sheriff precinct would be purged with everything else.
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 6:46:59 PM EDT
Now Bunny, you KNOW "WE" would not loot anything.

I can't speak for the libtards and commie hippy pinkos though.....
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 6:48:26 PM EDT

Originally Posted By DDofWA:
I'd still be dry. That place could use some cleanin' up.

DD



Same here.

Drop me a line if the floods come. We'll organize a BBQ.
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 7:05:12 PM EDT
The dry side of the state would cheer
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 7:11:01 PM EDT
We have our share of shitbirds here and some looting would probably take place, but not on the scale of that in La. It's like a third world country down there.
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 7:12:23 PM EDT
I would call it a good start.
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 7:27:13 PM EDT
Ya'll are planning on coming for my ammo stash aren't you?

You'll need a bigger boat.

and BTW 300WM AP is hell on boat hulls.
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 7:40:03 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:
Ya'll are planning on coming for my ammo stash aren't you?

You'll need a bigger boat.

and BTW 300WM AP is hell on boat hulls.



Nah Phil, you'll probably be needing it soon.
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 7:42:59 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Da_Bunny:

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:
Ya'll are planning on coming for my ammo stash aren't you?

You'll need a bigger boat.

and BTW 300WM AP is hell on boat hulls.



Nah Phil, you'll probably be needing it soon.



Really?

When?

I may want to order in more M14 magazines
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 7:52:41 PM EDT
. . . it would be a marked improvement!
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 8:12:44 PM EDT
If we can call it 8' at the waterfront, I will still be driving my big truck.

After a boat takes me to work.

I love my location. Up on a hill. Backside from Seattle (think blast). On the land, no bridge needed for egress.
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 8:18:49 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Kooter:
I've got an extra seat in my boat



You keep mentioning that you had a tragic boating accident right?
Link Posted: 8/30/2005 9:09:59 PM EDT

Originally Posted By STRATIOTES:
I live below Spada reservior in skyomish valley, if the big earth quake ever hits, most eveyone in the valley will be purged out to puget sound.

But the survivors would be free to loot as much as they want, as the sheriff precinct would be purged with everything else.



I hope they have SCUBA gear, because our drill is 17 min's from dam break to sultan, the City of Monroe will be under 8 feet of water after it settles.

I will be up on the hill with my Com's and a pair of Bino's laughing my ass off because I wont have to listen to the latin Music anymore. (If you think Im going to work anywhere but the firestation you are nutz!)
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 1:06:52 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Kooter:
I've got an extra seat in my boat



Shotgun!
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 5:31:00 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/31/2005 5:31:28 AM EDT by gunchyck]
If 15 feet of water hit Seattle, your dreaded liberals would come out in droves and have midnight candlelit memorials for three days... getting all the proper permits for said vigils... the "anarchists" would come out and start riots and looting... it would be a big party, the rubber bullets would fly again.
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 5:43:27 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:

Originally Posted By Da_Bunny:

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:
Ya'll are planning on coming for my ammo stash aren't you?

You'll need a bigger boat.

and BTW 300WM AP is hell on boat hulls.



Nah Phil, you'll probably be needing it soon.



Really?

When?


I may want to order in more M14 magazines



Wouldn't want to spoil the surprise........
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 5:52:42 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Da_Bunny:

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:

Originally Posted By Da_Bunny:

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:
Ya'll are planning on coming for my ammo stash aren't you?

You'll need a bigger boat.

and BTW 300WM AP is hell on boat hulls.



Nah Phil, you'll probably be needing it soon.



Really?

When?


I may want to order in more M14 magazines



Wouldn't want to spoil the surprise........



So you don't know......
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 6:06:25 AM EDT

Originally Posted By gunchyck:
If 15 feet of water hit Seattle, your dreaded liberals would come out in droves and have midnight candlelit memorials for three days... getting all the proper permits for said vigils... the "anarchists" would come out and start riots and looting... it would be a big party, the rubber bullets would fly again.



You forget that Starbucks will be closed and all of these people at the vigil will in reality be nothing but caffeine starved





ZOMBIES!

The streets will be filled with zombies.. that's no time to be using rubber bullets and pepperspray!



Link Posted: 8/31/2005 6:09:12 AM EDT

Originally Posted By 1GunnerHogan1:
Bunny thats true. But 15 feet of water would wash away A LOT of Californians.



Fixed it for ya
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 6:35:36 AM EDT

Originally Posted By gunchyck:
If 15 feet of water hit Seattle, your dreaded liberals would come out in droves and have midnight candlelit memorials for three days... getting all the proper permits for said vigils... the "anarchists" would come out and start riots and looting... it would be a big party, the rubber bullets would fly again.



That would be a frivolous distraction. Let them amuse themselves. Seattle residents are important, mostly to themselves. A giant collection of clueless Moonbats. The WTO riots drove off most of the business that Seattle needed to sustain itself. Boeing moved it's production overseas and relocated to Chicago. Many more businesses took the hint and followed the money. You won't be reading about it in the newpapers, that sort of thing shouldn't be publicized, after all.

Seattle is becoming a huge money pit that will never again be able to sustain itself. Cities were established to be economic centers, not welfare projects. They are becoming obsolete. The mandatory living standards have been raised to the point that, while they are desirable, they are simply unaffordable. We are all getting our pockets picked clean just to keep people from moving out, which would embarrass the local elite. Seattle is the most overpriced city in the country. For all their Liberalism, Seattle residents are myopic, tight-fisted misers when it comes to putting words into action.

The problem would be that 15' of water wouldn't be nearly enough....

There would be catastrophic, but localized flooding on the edges of the lakes, close to the rivers and in the valleys. The local rivers run pretty fast. I've seen the Snohomish River flood and the foundations of buildings were literally dug up by moving water. The ground around the buildings was washed away, leaving a concrete "boat" stranded high and dry.

The estimated repairs of $30,000,000,000 that Katrina will require (way too low, I'm guessing) wouldn't put a dent in the work needed to flood proof our local low-laying areas. We need nearly that much just to fix the roads and put in sidewalks around here.
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 10:23:07 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/31/2005 10:24:45 AM EDT by Cry_Havoc37]

Originally Posted By 1GunnerHogan1:
Bunny thats true. But 15 feet of water would wash away A LOT of scum liberals.




fixt it.
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 10:56:34 AM EDT
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 12:41:05 PM EDT
y'all could head over here, and be high and dry. we could watch the libs and commies drown on CNN.
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 4:32:38 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Da_Bunny:

Originally Posted By gunchyck:
If 15 feet of water hit Seattle, your dreaded liberals would come out in droves and have midnight candlelit memorials for three days... getting all the proper permits for said vigils... the "anarchists" would come out and start riots and looting... it would be a big party, the rubber bullets would fly again.



That would be a frivolous distraction. Let them amuse themselves. Seattle residents are important, mostly to themselves. A giant collection of clueless Moonbats. .



moonbats

I LOVE that! I'm going to use that
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 5:05:23 PM EDT
gunchyck, how come you aren't ripping into me: HERE?
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 5:19:25 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Da_Bunny:
gunchyck, how come you aren't ripping into me: HERE?



because, I love you (in a totally platonic way) AND I didn't know about it... lemme think...
Link Posted: 8/31/2005 7:35:52 PM EDT

Originally Posted By gunchyck:

Originally Posted By Da_Bunny:
gunchyck, how come you aren't ripping into me: HERE?



because, I love you (in a totally platonic way) AND I didn't know about it... lemme think...



GOSH......
Link Posted: 9/1/2005 6:14:21 AM EDT
The democrats don't know how to swim. It would be a good start at cleaning up the cess pool!
Link Posted: 9/1/2005 8:20:16 AM EDT

Originally Posted By RedDawg6:
The democrats don't know how to swim. It would be a good start at cleaning up the cess pool!



he's lying...we swim like fishes...heheh


Link Posted: 9/1/2005 9:05:20 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Hippynik:
he's lying...we swim like fishes...heheh


Ofcourse they can swim, how else could they navigate Seattle with 40 stories deep of putrid effluent.
Link Posted: 9/1/2005 9:35:57 AM EDT

Originally Posted By STRATIOTES:

Originally Posted By Hippynik:
he's lying...we swim like fishes...heheh


Ofcourse they can swim, how else could they navigate Seattle with 40 stories deep of putrid effluent.



Strat..you get an official ICKY on that one...

Link Posted: 9/1/2005 6:27:18 PM EDT

Originally Posted By RedDawg6:
The democrats LIBERALS don't know how to swim. It would be a good start at cleaning up the cess pool!



Fixt it for ya....
LIBERALS need cement shoes.
Link Posted: 9/1/2005 6:27:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/1/2005 6:30:09 PM EDT by 1GunnerHogan1]

Originally Posted By RedDawg6:
The democrats LIBERALS don't know how to swim. It would be a good start at cleaning up the cess pool!



THEY CAN'T HELP IT....ITS TOUGH TO SWIM WITH YOUR FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH....OR WHILE YOU ARE EATING CROW.
Link Posted: 9/2/2005 4:32:01 PM EDT
Lets think of the positive side, if Boeing pulls out of WA completely.....that leaves the largest building in the word empty........... I say we pool our resources and turn it into one kick @$s indoor live fire house.
Link Posted: 9/2/2005 4:44:10 PM EDT

Originally Posted By STRATIOTES:

Originally Posted By Hippynik:
he's lying...we swim like fishes...heheh


Ofcourse they can swim, how else could they navigate Seattle with 40 stories deep of putrid effluent.



Again with the big words!

Damn it Strat!
Link Posted: 9/2/2005 10:26:32 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/3/2005 1:40:30 PM EDT by STRATIOTES]

Originally Posted By Gibby:
Again with the big words!

Damn it Strat!



The dissociative miscognizance of the interrogative statement does not correlate to the philological etymology.

Will you restate the question clearly so I may understand ?
Link Posted: 9/3/2005 12:54:44 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/3/2005 1:14:45 PM EDT by gunchyck]

Originally Posted By STRATIOTES:
Ofcourse they can swim, how else could they navigate Seattle with 40 stories deep of putrid effluent.

Originally Posted By Gibby:
Again with the big words!

Damn it Strat!



The dissociative miscognizance of the interrogative statement does not correlate to the philogical etymology.

Will you restate the question clearly so I may understand ?



"effluent is an adjective, and therefpore used improperly in this sentence, Perhaps you meant effluence.
'miscognizance' is not in my gigantic dictionary, nor can I find it online, what does it mean in your world?
Same with "philogical"

Sorry, I'm grumpy, I need sex... or maybe chocolate.
Link Posted: 9/3/2005 1:39:14 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/3/2005 1:43:03 PM EDT by STRATIOTES]

Originally Posted By gunchyck:

"effluent is an adjective, and therefpore used improperly in this sentence, Perhaps you meant effluence.
'miscognizance' is not in my gigantic dictionary, nor can I find it online, what does it mean in your world?
Same with "philological" typo it was late

Sorry, I'm grumpy, I need sex... or maybe chocolate.


Cognizance \Cog"ni*zance\ (? or ?; 277), n. [OF. conissance,
conoissance, F. connaissance, LL. cognoscentia, fr. L.
cognoscere to know. See Cognition, and cf. Cognoscence,
Connoisseur.]
1. Apprehension by the understanding; perception;
observation.
[1913 Webster]


Philological
19 Moby Thesaurus words for "philological":
descriptive, glottochronological, grammatic, graphemic,
lexicographic, lexicological, lexicostatistical, lingual,
linguistic, metalinguistic, morphological, morphophonemic,
phonemic, phonetic, phonological, psycholinguistic, semantic,
structural, syntactic



ETA 30% of the english language is koine greek so even if only a lay knowledge of the mother tongue you should understand the constructs.
Link Posted: 9/3/2005 2:41:31 PM EDT

Originally Posted By STRATIOTES:

Originally Posted By Gibby:
Again with the big words!

Damn it Strat!



The dissociative miscognizance of the interrogative statement does not correlate to the philological etymology.

Will you restate the question clearly so I may understand ?



Link Posted: 9/3/2005 2:43:39 PM EDT

Originally Posted By gunchyck:

Originally Posted By STRATIOTES:
Ofcourse they can swim, how else could they navigate Seattle with 40 stories deep of putrid effluent.

Originally Posted By Gibby:
Again with the big words!

Damn it Strat!



The dissociative miscognizance of the interrogative statement does not correlate to the philogical etymology.

Will you restate the question clearly so I may understand ?



"effluent is an adjective, and therefpore used improperly in this sentence, Perhaps you meant effluence.
'miscognizance' is not in my gigantic dictionary, nor can I find it online, what does it mean in your world?
Same with "philogical"

Sorry, I'm grumpy, I need sex... or maybe chocolate.









MMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmm Chocolate!
Link Posted: 9/3/2005 2:48:35 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/3/2005 2:49:46 PM EDT by gunchyck]

Originally Posted By Gibby:

Originally Posted By gunchyck:

Originally Posted By STRATIOTES:
Ofcourse they can swim, how else could they navigate Seattle with 40 stories deep of putrid effluent.

Originally Posted By Gibby:
Again with the big words!

Damn it Strat!



The dissociative miscognizance of the interrogative statement does not correlate to the philogical etymology.

Will you restate the question clearly so I may understand ?



"effluent is an adjective, and therefpore used improperly in this sentence, Perhaps you meant effluence.
'miscognizance' is not in my gigantic dictionary, nor can I find it online, what does it mean in your world?
Same with "philogical"

Sorry, I'm grumpy, I need sex... or maybe chocolate.




MMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmm Chocolate!



maybe chocolate AND sex?

ETA does it really COUNT as sex when I am the only person in the room.... I know you republicans have different definitions of sex than us democrats

Top Top