Ah the first 1911. So glad I was ignorant. I went through three before i landed my flawless Springfield Loaded. Much trial and error. Unfortunately, since most 1911s are still made the old fashioned way (poor dimensional control and lots of hand work), it's hard to predict how any one pistol will perform based on experience with others from that maker. Plus, 1911 shooters are like hot rod owners. Many fiercely (and ignorantly) defend "their" brand, and rail against one or more others. Interestingly, all have irrefutable evidence why their biases are well founded in fact. You will hear many untruths: "you get what you pay for", "MIM is crap", "tack driver", etc.
Kimber has done for the 1911 what Gaston Glock did for firearms manufacturing has a whole - dragged it kicking and screaming into modern manufacturing. Because of that, they make some pretty good guns. There are plenty who will willingly chime in that all Kimbers are junk and you can't trust any of them. Someone will say that about any manufacturer
Armscor (Rock Island, Metro, and another brand) makes a good entry level 1911. They're extremely inexpensive, and that makes some people angry, for some reason. They've been throughly tested and are very well liked on another website I frequent, m1911.org. Taurus had problems with their original ambi safety, and as another inexpensive brand, is often villified for being afforable. Generally I have heard good feedback on Taurus 1911s, both on the range and when working in the gun shop. SigUSA and Smith & Wesson have pretty good reputations with their 1911s, also, and the SIGs don't have SIG triggers! .
That Smith you found might be hard to beat if you're okay with an external extractor. Others have tried them on 1911s, but they havent had a good track record (Kimber abandoned them). Speaking of Smith and Wesson, how can we forget their historical nemesis.....Only on the internet have I met a happy Colt 1911 owner. Everyone I've ever personally known who has owned a Colt 1911 pistol hates it. I take that back. There is one guy who took his top of the line Gold Cup and had $1800 worth of custom work done on it, and he likes his. On line (here and m1911.org) there are many who love Colts and would fight over what I've just said. Personally I know nothing, and can only share the experiences of my friends and acquaintences.
Para Ordnance (now ParaUSA) has an awful reputation on arfcom, and i cant understand why. Elsewhre on the net they are more fairly evaluated. Plus, I've owned their single action and currently carry an LDA as my primary CCW when traveling. Both are excellent. Until recently i was able to say they were flawless, but the LDA does not feed short barrel gold dots well. Actually no 1911 I own feeds them, so I can't blame Para.
The platform has a reputation for reliablity issues. Never mind we takea 100 year old design and expect it to work with ammuntion that didnt even exist when the gun was made. Running hollowpoints through a 1911 is kind of like running 10 ethanol through a gasoline engine and thinking it should hold up. Fortunately 1911s on hps do better than cars on "gasahol".
The only firearm-based malfunction I've had was a chronice failure to feed witha Charles Daly. The local smith couldnt make it run, CD's rpair center couldnt make it run. traded it on my first Para. the paras were ge3rat, my first 1911, a commander IAI, was great. it's hard to go wrong with a modern 1911, and usually they dont break. if they work at first they will work for a long time. if they dont work at first its usually a magazine problem.
If you have a prob with your gun, remember, there are very few problems with firearms that cannot be made worse by the judicious application of a dremel tool.