We can send the CLEO copies of our Form 1s to local law enforcement (PD or sheriff) or the "Head of State Police," which SilencerShop recommends as being FHP, but I was thinking FDLE would be the head of state police. You can also send it to your State Attorney, but I would not interpret the definition as being just any assistant state attorney mind you (although it doesn't seem to preclude that interpretation, I just think that would be dumb). The definition is found on 2(g) in the instructions on the Form 1.
So my question is where do you think would be the "best" place to send it and why...to the local PD, to the local sheriff, to FHP, to FDLE, or to the local State Attorney? Why?
Btw, I fully comprehend you can't send it to any PD or sheriff; I understand it is the PD or sheriff that has jurisdiction over the address of the applicant in box 3b of the Form 1.
I have no idea which of the five would be best and wanted to see what anyone else thought. I don't even know what would constitute "best" place. I am leaning to sending it to my local State Atty Office. I intend to call em up and see what they say. I'm guessing they will likely wonder if I am on drugs.
Thanks.
ETA - look at this statute, section 790.335:
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0790/Sections/0790.335.html
It says:
No state governmental agency or local government, special district, or other political subdivision or official, agent, or employee of such state or other governmental entity or any other person, public or private, shall knowingly and willfully keep or cause to be kept any list, record, or registry of privately owned firearms or any list, record, or registry of the owners of those firearms.
It also says (among many other things):
A list, record, or registry of legally owned firearms or law-abiding firearm owners is not a tool for fighting terrorism, but rather is an instrument that can be used as a means to profile innocent citizens and to harass and abuse American citizens based solely on their choice to own firearms and exercise their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed under the United States Constitution.
Law-abiding firearm owners whose names have been illegally recorded in a list, record, or registry are entitled to redress.
This SHOULD mean that as soon as the CLEO receives your notification, he can check it to see if the RP/Applicant is prohibited from possessing, but then must trash the notification. And if he doesn't, then the affected person would be entitled to "redress" which means lawsuit for cash. Even if you don't have actual damages, you would have nominal damages and a shifty lawyer could extort money from the law enforcement agency. That is a sizable incentive to not keep the records.
But keeping records really isn't my concern. I'm more interested to know if there are other reasons why I would want to choose one particular agency over another when it comes to CLEO notification.