The good news is that while the lower court decision (unfavorable) stands, the Supreme Court only denied the cert, meaning that they chose not to hear the case. They didn't make a summary judgment or allow a ruling to be made that could be cited as supreme court precedent. (Denial of a writ of certiorari is not precidential). For each case that the Supreme Court chooses to hear, the choose not to hear about 100 more. (Each year the supreme court hears in the vicinity of 80 cases, but receives between 8000 and 10000 petitions). I had a professor who would illustrate that fact very nicely with a power point. On one slide it listed the cases that were granted cert on some specific date. There were a couple of cases listed, large font, spaced out nicely. On the next slide she listed cases that were denied cert on the same day. Every corner of the slide was covered, the font was small, cases named one after another- nor could it have been said that all of those cases were meritless. The supreme court chooses what they want to hear.
For us, that is kind of good. Given the composition of the court, the best we could hope for is a 4-4 and a decision to rehear the case later. The other option at 4-4 would have been the decision being upheld and potentially negative national precedent.