Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 11/2/2009 10:48:24 AM EST
Probably a dumb question on my part but I wanted to see which mount y'all thought was better.

ML3- 2 moa

Micro H1- 4 moa.

Both will have larue mounts and both will be about the same price with mounts included (friend deal) I know the Micro is more expensive so you would think the quality is better unless you are just paying for the compact and lighter weight. Again, I am interested in hear your feedback/experience with these models.

Thanks in advance

Link Posted: 11/2/2009 12:56:51 PM EST
H1 is just smaller / lighter, you're paying for that more than anything else. I wouldn't say it's built better or tougher than a CompM series scope, just a lot smaller.

Link Posted: 11/2/2009 3:33:17 PM EST
I had the 2 moa dot and unless you just want that 300 yard precision I would suggest the 4 moa in either that you buy. My 2 cents
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 7:44:38 PM EST
Both are excellent quality. You're paying extra for reduction in size and weight of the Micro. I have both and prefer the Micro. FWIW, the Micro's dot is closer to 3 MOA than 4.
Top Top