
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's where I got the conflicting info. One post says OAL is measured with it on, and another says that the MSP legislative division says to measure in it's shortest fire-able configuration without the muzzle device (and brace if applicable). All posts were from a few years ago, I was hoping there was something more tangible by now. Clear as mud unless I missed something more recent. Looks like I'll RI-60 it with a thread protector and put the FH on when not transporting, I'll be covered either way at least.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes

Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Check MGO legal beagle for the current opinion on this.
That's where I got the conflicting info. One post says OAL is measured with it on, and another says that the MSP legislative division says to measure in it's shortest fire-able configuration without the muzzle device (and brace if applicable). All posts were from a few years ago, I was hoping there was something more tangible by now. Clear as mud unless I missed something more recent. Looks like I'll RI-60 it with a thread protector and put the FH on when not transporting, I'll be covered either way at least.
IANAL, but my reading of the MI law does not provide a defined legal definition of how to measure a pistol. I am quite familiar with MI's firearms laws, and the law does not describe how to measure or whether or not to count removable muzzle devices. There may be an MSP legal update on the matter, but that is only an interpretation of the law. That's not to say a judge couldn't rule the opposite.
IMHO, the first person that's going to get you in trouble for it is the LEO that stops you while carrying it. He will likely be unfamiliar with the MSP legal updates, and most likely will not let you unscrew your muzzle device before he measures. At that point he will cite you for improper transportation of a firearm and you'll have to dig your way out of it through the courts.