im a huge glock fan but i really like the USP .40.  I can either get a glock 22or 17 or a USP .40.  I've read an article in which these pistols were tested head to head.  The glock came out on top.  I really like the look and feel of the HK but the accuracy is not as good.. I guess i want to know why HK cannot shoot as well as the glock, because if it did i'd but one.

Pardon me but, who the hell said an HK can't shoot as well as a Glock?  I'd say that the inherent accuracy in either gun is on a par.  The biggest factor in accuracy is the nut behind the trigger.  That said, the standard USP triggers leave a lot to be desired.  The SA is pretty good the DA is long and creepy.  A match trigger is a pretty good option for making the USP easier to shoot accurately.

I can shoot pretty tight groups with my USP's, though not as tight as my 1911's.  I suck with Glocks.  I don't like the feel of the trigger and the grips don't fit my hand.  (they're great guns, but not for me)

Well stated

+2  I'm way better with my HK's than with any Glock.  I got rid of all my Glocks.  IMHO the HK USP is a MUCH better weapon than Glock.

I really need to shoot onehug.gif

do you have a link to the article that shows the Glock outperforming the USP?  Please post it.