>>>I posted the following over at Battlerifles.com<<<<
I compete with a Kimber 5” 1911 and in the last year or so have put in excess of 25,000 rounds through it without a problem. When it came time to buy a carry gun I naturally looked at a 1911, specifically a 3” 1911 and the Springfield caught my eye because it had Hogue grips just like I put on the big gun.
I had heard all of the horror stories about how finicky the little guns were so I spent a couple of months in heavy research to find which one was the most reliable, not the prettiest, not the most accurate (gunfight ranges are short), not the most prestigious, reliable, something you can trust your life to. I absolutely haunted 1911forum.com searching back a year or more and read everything I could about the little guns.
Conclusions (this, of course, is not a scientific study but rather impressions I gathered from reading hundreds and hundreds of posts there and elsewhere):
Springfield: 3 out of 4 owners thought they were great, no or easily corrected problems and were completely happy with their purchase. 1 in 4 thought the guns they had bought were the biggest pieces of crap that they had ever owned and many had sent them back to Springfield more than once, found that they still wouldn’t run and sold them in disgust. Hmmm…
Kimber: See above but change the numbers to 4 out of 5 great and 1 out of 5 bad. This was disappointing to me because my Kimber has ALWAYS been so good. The prices for the Kimbers are dramatically higher then the Springfields also.
What did I do? I bought a Colt ($675) and almost immediately replaced the magazines with a couple from CobraMag (trippresearch.com) and now have a carry gun that I can, and do, bet my life on.
How did the Colt Defender stack up in the above study? Well I didn’t find even ONE post where the person was so unhappy with the Colt that they gave up in disgust and sold the pistol. YMMV
Ed