Quote History Quoted:
If they work in your pistol I would say they are good to go, even if they are fake. I may have a couple possible genuine imitation USGI 1911 mags my self and they run great. If they do not function correctly that may be a good sign it is fake and cheaply made. Does it look poorly manufactured or is it robust in construction?
This Might Help View Quote
Hey guys...thanks for those links to other thread for info. This one was particularly awesome, Extracheeze! I think I found the info I needed!
Here are two of the magazines side by side for comparison. What is 99.99% a FAKE is the blued mag. The darker phosphate one is probably the real deal. Luckily I have 3 of the good ones and only 1 of the bad (probably got it with a pistol somewhere along the way). I believe I have two more of the real ones still in packages (somewhere).
Note the blued "fake" on the left has witness holes in the side that are extra large and punched too high in the body. Also note the crap quality of the spot welds at the base plates (picture lightened to better show the welds).
Here the lower mag is the fake. Again you can see the crappy welds and overall poor fitment of the base. The MFR code (30745
MASON-RUST CO) is well-known for having more fakes in circulation than good ones. The upper, again, appears to be completely legit (MFR. 8R611
KASCO METAL PRODUCTS).
Here they are from the top. Right is the fake. Note the feed lips are different and the profile of the follower is slightly different. Seems to be of soft, though thick, steel.
Finally, the toes. Fake is on the left. The drain hole is smaller and "rougher".
Rob