Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 1/12/2006 7:27:12 PM EDT
What guns do you think were meant for that specific caliber? I'll start first.

9x19mm: Beretta 92FS - God damn, sweetest shooting 9mm handgun out there!

.40S&W: SiG P229

.45ACP: 1911A1

.357MAGNUM: S&W 686 5"



Link Posted: 1/12/2006 7:51:04 PM EDT
[#1]
9mm: G17, BHP

.45acp: 1911

.40SW:HK USP

10MM: SW 1066 or G20

.357 Sig: SIG P-226/P-229

.22lr: Ruger (Mk series or single six)

.357mag: SW 686 or Colt Python
Link Posted: 1/12/2006 7:53:45 PM EDT
[#2]
DISCLAIMER!!!!! I AM NOT A GLOCK LOVER, I JUST WANT TO PUT THIS UP HERE BEFORE SOME REAL GLOCKIE DOES!!

9mm: glock
40: glock
10mm: glock
.357 sig: glock
.45 gap: glock
.45 acp: glock


if you read down that list of guns, it kinda sounds like waterfowl!
Link Posted: 1/12/2006 10:41:10 PM EDT
[#3]
9x19mm ___ Luger P-08

.40S&W ___  Smith & Wesson  4043

.45ACP ___   1911

.357Mag ___   Smith & Wesson 686
Link Posted: 1/12/2006 10:47:35 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:
What guns do you think were meant for that specific caliber? I'll start first.

9x19mm: Beretta 92FS - God damn, sweetest shooting 9mm handgun out there!

.40S&W: SiG P229

.45ACP: 1911A1

.357MAGNUM: S&W 686 5"






You are spot on!!!!
Link Posted: 1/12/2006 11:56:42 PM EDT
[#5]
9MM - CZ75

.40 - CZ75

.45 - CZ97B

CZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZCZ




Oh well there are those other pistols.
Link Posted: 1/13/2006 12:21:59 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
DISCLAIMER!!!!! I AM NOT A GLOCK LOVER, I JUST WANT TO PUT THIS UP HERE BEFORE SOME REAL GLOCKIE DOES!!

9mm: glock
40: glock
10mm: glock
.357 sig: glock
.45 gap: glock
.45 acp: glock


if you read down that list of guns, it kinda sounds like waterfowl!



There are two frame sizes of Glock...small and large. One is meant for 10mm, and the other for 9mm. The other calibers were shoehorned.
Link Posted: 1/13/2006 4:22:34 AM EDT
[#7]
The .357 magnum was made for the Smith models 27 and 19.

The .44 magnum is for the Smith model 29.
Link Posted: 1/13/2006 2:26:50 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
The .44 magnum is for the Smith model 29.



iirc the ruger blackhawk in .44mag hit the market in many places before the 29.
Link Posted: 1/13/2006 4:51:54 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The .44 magnum is for the Smith model 29.



iirc the ruger blackhawk in .44mag hit the market in many places before the 29.



Doesn't matter. The Model 29 is the quesesential .44 magnum.
Link Posted: 1/13/2006 6:36:21 PM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:

.40SW:HK USP




Yup!
Link Posted: 1/13/2006 8:17:56 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
What guns do you think were meant for that specific caliber? I'll start first.

9x19mm: Beretta 92FS - God damn, sweetest shooting 9mm handgun out there!

.40S&W: SiG P229

.45ACP: 1911A1

.357MAGNUM: S&W 686 5"






You are spot on!!!!



I've never understood the attraction to the Beretta 92FS. I qualified on one in the Army, and carried it in the field, and my Father in law has a 96, as does my brother in law. I did some shooting with their 96's. My father in law's 96 KB'ed on a factory Hydroshock once at the range. The safety is terrible for a handgun that is meant to be drawn and fired quickly for a combat engagement. I don't like double action autos very much, but that's a personal thing. I prefer single action, but that's personal preferance. YMMV. They are fairly reliable with good mags, and fairly accurate, but not moreso than any other modern stock auto. There are a lot of little design features that I just don't care for, and that seem overly elaborate after spending some time with a simple efficient pistol like the Glock. My grip is more solid on a Glock as well. I think the Glock 17 or 19 are the best 9mm pistols out there, as far as stock fighting pistols go. Again, YMMV. I'm not saying the 92FS is a bad gun, but it's just not my choice.
What makes it a "sweet shooter"?
Link Posted: 1/13/2006 8:26:02 PM EDT
[#12]
As i sit here with my beretta 92 on my hip....

I've never shot a 9mm that i liked more than my 92.  The action is silk smooth, is 100% reliable, and overall a great gun.

The safety is just as quick and easy to disengage as a frame mounted safety, and if you dont like to disengage it, just get a G model and you wont need to worry about that (decock only)

The feel of the pistol is unbeatable.  It feels like it was poured into my hand.  Of all the pistols I have shot, including glocks, S&W, sig, taurus, 1911 and a few more, i much prefer the 92.

And any pistol will KB, and the 92 definately doesnt carry the reputation of other well known pistols.
Link Posted: 1/13/2006 8:42:39 PM EDT
[#13]
Link Posted: 1/13/2006 9:30:55 PM EDT
[#14]
5.7x28 pistol: FN Five Seven
5.7x28 Rifle: PS90

9mm: glock 18

45ACP: 1911

Link Posted: 1/14/2006 11:48:18 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:
As i sit here with my beretta 92 on my hip....

I've never shot a 9mm that i liked more than my 92.  The action is silk smooth, is 100% reliable, and overall a great gun.

The safety is just as quick and easy to disengage as a frame mounted safety, and if you dont like to disengage it, just get a G model and you wont need to worry about that (decock only)

The feel of the pistol is unbeatable.  It feels like it was poured into my hand.  Of all the pistols I have shot, including glocks, S&W, sig, taurus, 1911 and a few more, i much prefer the 92.

And any pistol will KB, and the 92 definately doesnt carry the reputation of other well known pistols.



Thanks for taking the time to give a well thought out and articulated response to my question. I understand that the 92 has a pretty sizable following. That alone speaks highly for it. I didn't think it was a bad pistol, I just didn't personally like it that much. It sounds like you can disengage the safety pretty well, but I've never seen anyone do it quickly and efficiently in person. Have you used it in a high round count training scenario that had a lot of draw stroke reps?
Sorry to hijack the thread.

9mm  Glock 17or 19
40 S&W    USPF
45ACP    1911
.357sig     Sig 229
.357 Mag    Colt Python
Link Posted: 1/14/2006 12:43:47 PM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:
DISCLAIMER!!!!! I AM NOT A GLOCK LOVER, I JUST WANT TO PUT THIS UP HERE BEFORE SOME REAL GLOCKIE DOES!!

9mm: glock
40: glock
10mm: glock
.357 sig: glock
.45 gap: glock
.45 acp: glock
if you read down that list of guns, it kinda sounds like waterfowl!



 Not quite.

9mm--Glock 17, Beretta 92, Sig 226(?), there's more I'm sure
.40--Sig P229, HK USP
.45--1911
Link Posted: 1/14/2006 1:26:07 PM EDT
[#17]
9mm-BHP
.45-1911
.40-irrelevant
.357-S&W 19....or 27
.22-Buckmark, MkII, and 41
Link Posted: 1/14/2006 1:50:39 PM EDT
[#18]
Amazing the Bren Ten and the 10mm is not listed yet.

Link Posted: 1/14/2006 1:54:33 PM EDT
[#19]
I gotta say, G17 for 9mm, close second would be the 92fs, but what do i know?
Link Posted: 1/14/2006 3:00:29 PM EDT
[#21]
9mm: Glock, Highpower, Beretta 92f, Sig 226
.40 S&W: HK USP
.45ACP: 1911, HK MK23 Mod 0
10mm:  Bren Ten
Link Posted: 1/14/2006 10:54:40 PM EDT
[#22]


.380=Sig P232

9mm=Sig P228/P210

.40SW=Sig P226/X-5

.357Sig=Sig P229

.45ACP=Sig P220ST (or Sig GSR)

Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top