Quoted: I have a few question about HK pistols. I have handled the full-size USPs (never fired), and have always wanted one. I'm in the market for a new handgun, and the USP is in the running. The other pistols I'm considering are from Glock (17 or 21) and Browning (Hi-Power). I would like a 9mm, as I already have a reliable 1911 in 45acp, but I wouldn't be upset about either a Glock 21 or a USP 45.
So, here are my questions. Are HK pistols that much better than others to demand the higher prices? If so, Why?
|
IMO, yes, they are. For one thing you can always count on the USP being 100% reliable right out of the box and also being more accurate than you are. The shooter is the limiting factor on how well a USP shoots 99.5% of the time. You do not need to do any fine tuning, they are just about perfect from the get go. The HK also uses a fully supported chamber so while you can KB any pistol, the unsupported chamber of the Glock will let the case head fail long before it will fail in a USP. If you only shoot factory that is not really a concern, but if you are a handloader then the USP IMO is a much better choice. If you load hot your brass will last much longer in the USP over the Glock.
What's with all the Variants? IIRC, V1 allows cocked and locked carry, which I would like. Are all variants produced now?
|
All variants are still produced. What's up with that you say? Choice. The USP allows the shooter to tailor the way the pistol functions and shoots to the individual shooter. Not the one size fits all of the Glock. With the Glock you pretty much have a choice of different pull weights but that is all.
If you want safety and decock as well as SA/DA, V1 and V2 is the choice.
If you want safety, but no decock and still want to carry cocked and locked and SA/DA, then V9 and V10 is your flavor.
If you want no safety to worry about taking off and do not want to carry cocked and locked, still want SA/DA and only the decock, V3 and V4 is the logical choice.
If you want DAO but still would prefer a safety, V5 and V6 are the numbers you want.
DAO with no safety, V7 and V8 (V8 not imported, night sights are too powerful) get the nod.
If you want a lighter DAO then you have three LEM triggers, 8, 7, and 5 pound pulls.
Variety is what makes the USP so great. And if you decide you don't like the variant you have, at most $100 will put you into any variant you want between 1 and 10 and $150 will get you into the LEMs. If going from the LEM to any other variant it will set you back about $220.
In a CDNN catalog I have, they list a USP 45 for $672, and a USP 45 Tactical for $849. Assuming the days of the $849 Tactical aren’t long gone, is it worth the money for target sights, a threaded barrel and a different trigger? ETA- I'm a decent shot with a handgun, but I don’t plan on a can anytime soon, and the sights and trigger would be the only real benefits for my uses.
Thanks for any replies.
|
IMO yes, the Tactical is worth the extra money. If you add up all the extras that come with the Tac it is something like $450 worth of extras that you only pay about $200 extra for when you get the Tac. The trigger alone is worth the extra money IMO. The sights, threaded barrel, and o-ring barrel to aid in consistent lock-up (therefore increasing accuracy) are just icing on the cake.