Emphasis on the last question (more than one in the posting).
I used to resent the reluctance of any gun manufacturer to "approve modifications". As I have grown older and seen the craziness in this world, I have gained an appreciation. Now just imagine the following. There is a modification such as putting on an extended slide release after sale from the factory. Glock excitedly "approves" a modification specifying partx manufactured by companyx. Some dofus decides that he is going to do the modification himself. So, he goes and buys a knockoff part made by companyz. He then buys a hand dremel (you'll understand why in a moment).
Now he is all set up. Dofus has been drinking beer and just had a fight with his wife. He forgets to put on his safety goggles. He holds up the extended slide release and is going to dremel off a burr on the knockoff part. The dremel touches the burr which flies off and strikes him in the eye.
Dofus goes to a lawyer (and I am a lawyer). Well, Glock never specified the procedures for installation of the part at home, so it is Glock's fault that the guy was injured. Oh, and Glock never and should have cautioned about using knock part of companyz, so it is Glock's fault. And, stretching itttttttttttttttttt, some lawyer will assert that it is dumb to approve of home modifications to firearms when the original manufacturer has no way of examining and approving of the skills of the home tinkerer.
How much do you think it costs, in legal fees, for a lawyer to pick up a defense file, evaluate it, establish that Dofus is a certifiable idiot and to convince his lawyer to drop the suit. Try $20,000. So, if you spread $20,000 over 2,000 pistol sales at $10 a throw, you are covered.
And, people get pissed because a manufacturer doesn't "approve" of modifications? Get real.
Next, Glock tells the general public about specific modifications to a Glock 17 that will enable a person to shoot a Glock under water.
Dofus has a son in a fraternity at UCLA. Dofus, Jr. decides it would be cool to shoot the gun underwater in the fraternity swimming pool at a party. Get the point? Frankly, I have never heard of a civilian shooting range with underwater facilities such as 25 yard targets. Is it understandable why Glock will do that type of modification for LEO or military only?
The series of questions are routine and repetitive on a number of boards. People shouldn't get worked up and attack the poster. It is a stage that we all go through.
Eventu
ally, if we live long enough, we appreciate that our energy is better spent learning how to shoot on the run, cover 360 degrees, shoot in low light, and learn a shooting technique that covers handgun, shotgun, rifle, and submachine gun and stay away from time wasters like:
9mm vs. .45acp
Glock vs government model
Savage vs. Remington bolt action
the purchase of cheap ammo (that doesn't work in a firearm)
Markovs and why they are the performance equivalent of an HK pistol costing 8 times as much
what equipment SF uses (particularly when we are so fat that we cannot take the trashcan to the street)
the advantage of owing a 2 foot bowie knife that we leave in the safe