Put another 100 rounds downrange this afternoon. Had two consecutive failure to feeds (FTF) at rounds 80 and 81. Still not thrilled with plastic recoil guide, plastic backstrap.
General impressions: Pistol seems to shoot low consistently. Recoil of 40 S&W is minimal, due to weight of Beretta. Much more pleasant to shoot 40s in this than my Glock 23. Rounds were 155gr FMJ.
Trigger still a little heavy, but is smoothing up. The FTFs surprised me a bit as my 92FS has never failed to feed once in the six years I've owned it and the several thousand rounds that have gone through it.
I never really decide whether I like or dislike a handgun until I've put at least a thousand rounds through it. For me, it takes that long to get comfortable with sights, grip angles, actions, barrel lengths, etc. (The sole exception was my Browning HP in 9mm. First time I picked it up it was "Wow, we're made for each other."). The Beretta 96FS Vertec has me underwhelmed so far.
Sometimes it feels glass smooth, other times I can actually feel the slide traveling under recoil. I have been potting at cans for these approximately 150 rounds; my next goal is to bench rest it and put it on paper.
Several folks have said "Harumph, .40 S&W is not an accurate round like a .45ACP" but I've always felt it was more the shooter than the round. Any thoughts on inherent accuracy of a 9mm vs. .40 S&W vs. .45ACP, assuming similar barrel lengths and action types?