Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/19/2017 7:27:10 PM
Posted: 10/1/2001 6:36:54 PM EDT
just leafin through some pages of GunTests that a fellow member was kind enough to send me. (im deciding which 1911 based 45 to get to carry) anyways, i get to the results of the tests and damned if the Springfield Champion i was considering scored a DONT BUY rating for being too inaccurate (3.0'' at 25 yards) BUT!!! the wilson CQB was rated a definite BUY because it was VERY ACCURATE (2.9'' at 25 yards) explain that! then they also listed a S&W as a buy even though it is not that accurate (2.5'' at 25 yards) seems odd (someone's gettin a little compensation...i wonder if they got to keep the Wilson)
Link Posted: 10/1/2001 6:41:06 PM EDT
I stopped my subcsrition cuz they were full o shyte.
Link Posted: 10/1/2001 6:42:32 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/1/2001 6:37:35 PM EDT by sr15]
According to Wilson Combat, the accuracy guarantee of the CQB is 1" at 25 yds. [url]http://www.wilsoncombat.com/pistols/cqb.asp[/url]
Link Posted: 10/1/2001 6:57:46 PM EDT
yeah i know, i read that too...(also found it strange) by the way, although it makes no difference, it was the CQB compact
Link Posted: 10/2/2001 7:57:14 AM EDT
Gun mags are worse than computer mags. The reviewed 'quality' of the product is directly proportional to the amount of money spent on advertising in the magazine.
Link Posted: 10/2/2001 9:08:13 AM EDT
Top Top