Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
11/20/2019 5:07:11 PM
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 4
Posted: 10/17/2013 2:24:00 PM EST
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want.

the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press.

when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you.

wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech.

we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though.

just sayin'





Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:27:22 PM EST
lol
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:29:21 PM EST
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:30:43 PM EST
There have been some REALLY fucking stupid OPs today, but this one just blew those out of the water.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:30:52 PM EST


i tried....i really did


but dude....get it together






ps....i think i understand ......but, economy of word ....you need it
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:30:54 PM EST
OP FAILED EVERYTHING
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:31:25 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By the_great_mantis:
lol
View Quote

Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:31:35 PM EST
Look, we have a Con Law professor in our midst.


lulzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:32:03 PM EST
I guess deaf-mutes can't exercise that right than?
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:32:06 PM EST
Originally Posted By boboluv:
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want.

the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press.

when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you.

wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech.

we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though.

just sayin'

View Quote
That part, you missed,
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:33:39 PM EST
'09er.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:33:46 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ArchInfidel:
That part, you missed,
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ArchInfidel:
Originally Posted By boboluv:
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want.

the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press.

when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you.

wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech.

we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though.

just sayin'

That part, you missed,

Pay him no mind. He's high.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:33:50 PM EST
[Last Edit: 10/17/2013 2:34:53 PM EST by HiramRanger]
Originally Posted By boboluv:
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want.

the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press.

when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you.

wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech.

we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though.

just sayin'



View Quote

A couple hundred years of court rulings would disagree... Oh yeah, choke yourself. Stand in front of me and I'll say it rather than typing it.



Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:34:50 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ArchInfidel:
That part, you missed,
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ArchInfidel:
Originally Posted By boboluv:
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want.

the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press.

when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you.

wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech.

we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though.

just sayin'

That part, you missed,

Wait...you mean those 'petitions' could be written....or even pictures? No cursive now...that wouldn't be fair.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:34:54 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Eric802:
Not a Constitutional scholar, are ya?
View Quote


Dangit. I came here to proclaim that, "What we got here is a full fledged book learner."
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:34:54 PM EST
Don't stop him. He's on a roll.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:37:26 PM EST
Mr. boboluv, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.
Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.
I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:40:04 PM EST
You need a cranial-rectal inversion.

Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:40:47 PM EST
This thread is butt beads.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:41:41 PM EST
Well, I guess Congress can ban sign language.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:43:28 PM EST
Idiot.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:43:55 PM EST
So, does that mean I have to be in a militia to arm bears?
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:44:13 PM EST
Wow, did the nut house close down and release everybody?
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:45:03 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By thelastgunslinger:
There have been some REALLY fucking stupid OPs today, but this one just blew those out of the water.
View Quote

Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:45:58 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By thelastgunslinger:
There have been some REALLY fucking stupid OPs today, but this one just blew those out of the water.
View Quote


Yep.

Drink less. Post less.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:47:03 PM EST
This thread is so dildos it should be locked just for existing.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:49:15 PM EST

Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:49:35 PM EST
Statist are funny.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:50:43 PM EST
Is that you Barry?
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:50:44 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By wtturn:
Pay him no mind. He's high.
View Quote

I think the word you were looking for was dumb.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:50:52 PM EST
What in the world, OP?
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:51:34 PM EST
Originally Posted By boboluv:
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want.

the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press.

when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you.

wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech.

we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though.

just sayin'





View Quote

If you think the only reason you can ban child porn is because it's not considered speech then you have issues. The fact you said it could arguably be defended as press confirms this.

We could talk about the speech issue, and the natural law, but I don't think you'd grasp much of it.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:51:46 PM EST
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:52:23 PM EST
OP went full retard. Now go back to the DU where you belong.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:53:20 PM EST
OP graduated from the Obama school of Constitutional Law.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:54:44 PM EST
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:55:08 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By thelastgunslinger:
There have been some REALLY fucking stupid OPs today, but this one just blew those out of the water.
View Quote

Link Posted: 10/17/2013 2:58:44 PM EST
WTF?

On mobile cannot see join date... Please be a 13er




Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:01:32 PM EST
This is the biggest fucking pile of fucking fail I have fucking seen in fucking quite some fucking time on this site.

Fuck
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:01:35 PM EST
[Last Edit: 10/17/2013 3:05:37 PM EST by AR45fan]
Glad I get to teach this subject to my students instead of you.

Oh, and TROLL THREAD.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:02:00 PM EST


Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:04:07 PM EST
[Last Edit: 10/17/2013 3:04:36 PM EST by wildturkey09]
Originally Posted By boboluv:
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want.

the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press.

when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you.

wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech.

we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though.

just sayin'





View Quote


Youre going to quote feinstien in an argument to infringe on my rights?

Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:04:46 PM EST
Whatever you say, buddy.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:05:33 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JSmith88:
OP FAILED EVERYTHING
View Quote

Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:07:18 PM EST
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:07:35 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By mayday:
Mr. boboluv, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.
Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.
I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
View Quote




Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:08:45 PM EST
[Last Edit: 10/17/2013 3:11:41 PM EST by ultramagbrion]
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:09:05 PM EST
Y'all bakers toasting in a roll bread.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:09:23 PM EST
I thought this was a 13er thread at first.
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:10:25 PM EST
Um....No
Link Posted: 10/17/2013 3:12:04 PM EST
Originally Posted By boboluv:
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want.

the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press.

when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you.

wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech.

we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though.

just sayin'





View Quote


Can you keep and bare a nuke? No. Can you use a nuke to hurt one and not innocent? No. Your logic is worse than your ramblings.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 4
Top Top