User Panel
Posted: 10/17/2013 3:24:00 PM EDT
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want.
the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press. when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you. wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech. we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though. just sayin' |
|
There have been some REALLY fucking stupid OPs today, but this one just blew those out of the water.
|
|
i tried....i really did but dude....get it together ps....i think i understand ......but, economy of word ....you need it |
|
Look, we have a Con Law professor in our midst.
lulzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
|
Quoted: free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want. the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press. when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you. wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech. we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though. just sayin' View Quote |
|
Quoted: Quoted: free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want. the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press. when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you. wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech. we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though. just sayin' Pay him no mind. He's high.
|
|
Quoted:
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want. the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press. when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you. wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech. we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though. just sayin' View Quote A couple hundred years of court rulings would disagree... Oh yeah, choke yourself. Stand in front of me and I'll say it rather than typing it. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want. the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press. when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you. wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech. we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though. just sayin' Wait...you mean those 'petitions' could be written....or even pictures? No cursive now...that wouldn't be fair. |
|
|
Mr. boboluv, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. |
|
|
|
This thread is so dildos it should be locked just for existing.
|
|
|
Quoted:
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want. the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press. when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you. wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech. we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though. just sayin' View Quote If you think the only reason you can ban child porn is because it's not considered speech then you have issues. The fact you said it could arguably be defended as press confirms this. We could talk about the speech issue, and the natural law, but I don't think you'd grasp much of it. |
|
OP went full retard. Now go back to the DU where you belong.
|
|
|
WTF?
On mobile cannot see join date... Please be a 13er Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
This is the biggest fucking pile of fucking fail I have fucking seen in fucking quite some fucking time on this site.
Fuck |
|
Glad I get to teach this subject to my students instead of you.
Oh, and TROLL THREAD. |
|
Quoted: Mr. boboluv, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
free speech means you can say whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can go wherever you want. it doesn't mean you can post pictures of whatever you want. it doesn't mean you can wear any t-shirt you want. the first amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." it mentions the press separately. writing is not the same as speaking. we have freedom of speech AND freedom of the press. writing a blog is not freedom of speech... it is freedom of the press. when fuckstein was debating gun control the senator asked her "do we put 'common sense' restrictions on the first amendment the way we do to the second?" her response was "YES, BECAUSE WE DON'T ALLOW CHILD PORN." when you expand freedom of speech to include other activities that are not speech you create this slippery slope that can then be used against you. wearing an american flag tshirt to school is not freedom of speech. trespassing on a closed memorial to protest immigration law is not freedom of speech. on the radio, someone argued that the immigration people should be allowed to trespass on the memorial because they were protesting but the veterans should not be allowed to trespass on the ww2 memorial because they were just visiting and therefore were not exercising their right to free speech. we fuck ourselves when we don't notice these subtle liberties taken with reason and logic. when someone says, "does the 2nd amendment mean we can have nukes" the answer is YES. nukes are arms and the 2nd protects arms. if you want to ban nukes then you must do it with article 5 and a revision of the bill of rights. if you want to ban child porn that is fine because taking pictures and displaying pictures is not speech. it could arguably be freedom of the press though. just sayin' View Quote Can you keep and bare a nuke? No. Can you use a nuke to hurt one and not innocent? No. Your logic is worse than your ramblings. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.