Quoted: There is only one reason for the government wanting to outlaw BV's for 'civilians'...
It means they want to be able to shoot you.
|
The armor-ban advocate's logic behind banning armor goes something like this:
*Civilians can own armor, so criminals will try to get their hands on more potent weapons in order to defeat armor.
*If civilians can get armor, so can criminals.
*If criminals have armor, police will have to resort to more powerful weapons in order to defeat the criminal's armor, and likewise the criminals will use more powerful weapons to defeat the police's armor. (starting an "arms race") Thousands of innocent children will be gunned down while buying ice cream at the ice cream truck (the same truck that sells machine guns and body armor, by the way).
*Police have a right to wear armor, but civilians don't because there's a remote chance that some civilians might be criminals. Never mind the fact that body armor is purely defensive in nature.
blah blah blah you know the rest.