MINNOWS > MAN, againhttp://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/24998152/detail.htmlLawsuit May End Fire Retardant Use After 2011
Environmental Group: Water, Fertilizer Mix Is Harmful To Fish, Plants & Habitat
POSTED: 8:38 pm MDT September 13, 2010
JEFFERSON COUNTY, Colo. –– The fire retardant dropped from air tankers to prevent wildfires from spreading may no longer be an option after 2011.
As
many as nine air tankers have dropped retardant –– a mixture of water,
fertilizer and red dye –– on both the Fourmile Canyon Fire in Boulder
County and the Reservoir Road Fire in Larimer County. The retardant is
used to build a perimeter around a fire and is not dropped directly on
the flames to put out the fire.
"It's not an extinguishment, it's a
retardant. It's basically there to slow down and help the ground crews
100 percent," said David Stickler, a pilot for one of the lead planes
that guides and acts as a lookout for an air tanker. "You want to stop
it so when the fire's coming up towards the house, it's going to slow
down at that point and let the ground firefighters get in there and
knock it down the rest of the way."
A federal lawsuit filed in 2003 and another in 2008 by the Forest
Service Employees for Environmental Ethics calls into question the use
of fire retardant. The lawsuit suggests the mixture jeopardizes fish,
plants and other habitats."They basically haven't made a retardant that can put out a fire completely without harming the environment," said Stickler.Stickler
told 7NEWS that retardant can be harmful to certain fish, but that
retardant is not dropped within 300 feet of a water source unless an
incident commander feels lives or property are at risk.
"For very,
very, very small fish like minnows, that type of thing, you'll see that
once it does get exposed to sunlight, those type of small fish, where
they don't have the strength to defend, will actually start to perish at
that point," said Stickler.7NEWS asked if that's reason enough to stop using retardant.
"Actually, I've seen where you're getting more damage from ash going
into the rivers than from the retardant going into the rivers," said
Stickler. "We'll go out there a year afterwards and you'll see that the
grass is really green there.
"A federal judge has given the U.S.
Forest Service until the end of 2011 to complete environmental studies
on the impact of fire retardant, as well as coming up with alternatives
to retardant. Otherwise, the use of fire retardant could end.
"Then
we would be dropping (water) right on the fire, (which) is a completely
different strategy. It's better to make it so we can have the fire come
up to it and go out on its own," said Stickler. "We have used water
drops in a lot of places –– then we can go direct on the hits and stuff
like that –– but the effectiveness of that, with a large fire like
(Fourmile Canyon and Reservoir Road, are) very ineffective."
Air Tankers Aren't Based In Any One AreaThere are 17 air tankers available nationwide to the U.S. Forest Service to drop fire retardant.
When
the Fourmile Canyon fire was reported on the morning of Sept. 6, air
tankers didn't arrive in Colorado to drop retardant on the fire until
the late afternoon. The Reservoir Road Fire was reported Sunday morning,
and within two hours, tankers that had been in Colorado for the Boulder
County wildfire were dropping retardant on the fire in Loveland.
"It
was unbelievably lucky for the people in Loveland that these aircraft
were here," said Rita Baysinger, public information officer with the
Rocky Mountain Area Coordination Center.
"This definitely was a
best-case scenario," Baysinger added. "There are just not enough tankers
that any one area can just say, 'Well, we want to keep them all for
ourselves.'"