User Panel
Posted: 8/22/2002 6:10:01 PM EDT
To say this forum has be on edge for the last little while would be an understatement. Anyone who has been around here for more then a year knows that this is part of the cycle. Next it will be mod bashing (started already), then it will be something else.
The problem as I see it is we have a few people who post here who make it their calling in life to post topics they know will start something. I've seen many a thread like this that a Mod has posted in asking the person to edit their post,etc. The thread gets back on track and someone has to throw some gas on the fire by trying to get the last word in. It grows old real fast folks. That is one reason threads get locked. I find it amusing that all the members here have no problem voicing their opinion on a topic based on their interpretation of the subject but when a thread gets locked because of a Mods interpretation of said subject or the posts in the thread he is being a power hungry PC thug. I can tell you it takes a while to get the hang of being an effective firm but fair mod.(I'm not there yet!) Especially when it comes to applying the conduct code. Everyone reads it different. We allow latitude when enforcing it based on everyone not reading the same message in it. How about giving the Mods some latitude if their interpretation isn't identical to yours? It isn't easy walking the line with such a diverse group of people. Instead of starting a clone thread of one that got locked to prove a point or ranting and raving like a little kid, how about discussing it like the mature gun owners we are and offering solutions. Give the Mods a chance to get the hang of it. Sure they will make a mistake or two. Haven't you? I sure as hell have. This is our site, if you think something needs to be fixed or changed then offer suggestions and help change it. Don't sit back and hurl insults and attack people who donate their time for free to help out on the premiere gun site on the net. Lets get this sorted out, put behind us and move on. [size=3][red]Okay folks. Let me narrow the scope of this discussion down a bit. I posted this thread asking for ideas and suggestions to help get the GD forum back where it was. Lets limit the replies to that please! thanks.[/red][/size=3] |
|
well, we can start by making the MOD selection process open to the users, like an election, rather than buddies choosing buddies.
and how about keeping tabs on who locks what topics and having them justify to EVERYONE in the open exactly WHY the thread was locked. |
|
well for one the beekeeper1 just locked another
damn post that did not cross any lines only because he thought it might be trolling. what bullshit! edited because i would have kept my mouth shut for the rest of the night BUT NO another lock |
|
Quoted: well, we can start by making the MOD selection process open to the users, like an election, rather than buddies choosing buddies. and how about keeping tabs on who locks what topics and having them justify to EVERYONE in the open exactly WHY the thread was locked. View Quote I like it[:D] It'll never happen[V] |
|
Quoted: well, we can start by making the MOD selection process open to the users, like an election, rather than buddies choosing buddies. I'll second that. |
|
My only suggestion would be the same as serpico's second one. If a mod locks a thread he should leave a post saying why.
|
|
yeah, he seems to do that.
not to echo what i just said bit HOW BOUT NO MORE OF THIS "I DON'T LIKE THIS THREAD, SO I'M GONNA LOCK IT BULLSHIT"? mods should have to post WHY they locked a thread, PUBLICLY, and as a result of what VIOLATION OF THE CONDUCT CODE. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: well, we can start by making the MOD selection process open to the users, like an election, rather than buddies choosing buddies. quote] I'll second that. View Quote Sounds fair to me. I can't really see a problem ith it. 3 month terms? re-election? Sounds better now that I think about it. I hope I don't start seeing yard signs if it happens [:D] |
|
Quoted: well, we can start by making the MOD selection process open to the users, like an election, rather than buddies choosing buddies. and how about keeping tabs on who locks what topics and having them justify to EVERYONE in the open exactly WHY the thread was locked. View Quote meta-moderation going to start sounding like slashdot |
|
BRING ON THE BOI!!!!!
LOL... no actually people just need to GROW THE F UP!! |
|
exactly stormbringer grow up, i did not get a chance to tell you that i do not poke sticks at animals at the zoo, but you had to throw your jab.
|
|
Maybe, just MAYBE, everyone shouldn't be whiny little children, and watch their opinions. People in internet conversations, are known to just let anything fly.
MAYBE people should mind their manners in these forums, and not complain about the Mods. Would you walk into someones home and start spouting off at the mouth? What happens if something is said that pisses someone off? The pissed off person starts to think of whitty, mean things, or the post gets locked. It is alot of fun to post from the safety of your parents basement, and say things that might get your a$$ kicked if you said it in mixed company... Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Opinions are like a$$holes, they all stink, but some stink more than others. Grow up all, and don't kvetch if you have 45 posts. I am a noob here, get tons of good information, watch my manners, and all goes well. |
|
Is it my imagination or did things start to take a shit here when McUzi came back?[:D]
|
|
How about we adopt this-
"The General Non-Gun Discussion Forum is provided for the benefit of all members, as a means to communicate about other things than firearms and to get to know one another as a group. It is NOT a personal soapbox forum for spouting controversial issues such as race and religion. The administrators of this forum have tried to give as much slack as possible, but lately it has become a huge headache as some folks seem fit to only post here and raise hell, instead of trying to contribute something positive. In private discussion it was considered that we remove the non-gun forum entirely, however, in the meantime we have decided to try something different. We will continue to run the non-gun forum, but any topic that we feel is in poor taste or that breaks forum rules will be deleted IMMEDIATELY. Members who object or who continue to pose a problem will have their posting privileges taken away. We feel that this is a more fair solution than to simply remove this forum entirely and hurt everybody, so let's see how this works. If you have any questions or comments feel free to e-mail me or any of the other administrators." I swiped this from 1911forum.com |
|
Quoted: Grow up all, and don't kvetch if you have 45 posts. View Quote easy tiger, you don't know DICK about me,just because you read what's under my name. i've been here a LOT longer than you. your holier than thou attitude REMINDS me of the mods we are referring to. |
|
WOW, way to cool I would hate to go drinking with you guys, I would have to fight my way out of all the bars, and drag your sorry behinds with me.
|
|
Aw, heck.
I like the all the locked threads. I head right for them to see who is arguing with who about what... I really wish you guys would collect all the locked threads and place them in a forum called the 'Trash Heap' It would save me a lot of time loading the pages looking for locked threads. You learn alot about a family by watching them argue. TRG PS. BTW, the whole "In Before the Lock" fiasco is a symptom of over zealous moderating. People are expecting any controversial topics to be locked. IBTL would not exist if over zealous moderating was not occurring. Just relax a little, let people vent/rant about topics or each other. We are all big kids here. Let people rant and rave until they get it out of their systems. A good flame war between two goofballs is hig quality entertainment imho. Oh yeah, almost forgot...IBTL! [:D] |
|
15 replies and 6 offering suggestions. The rest..people hurling insults at others.
|
|
well, you got my suggestions.
the recent post asking the mods to simply explain why certain threads were locked, which was then promptly LOCKED, is not only indicitive of the problem, but an indicator of the "untouchable" feeling some of the mods here exhibit to the "commoners" something has to give, or pretty soon, this board will just be 600 mods, patrolling each others threads for something to lock. |
|
If you think it's that bad, quit posting things and quit reading other people's posts. It seems like the moderators have their hands full trying to babysit everyone. If someone wants to bash someone, I'm sure there are better forums out there. It seems like a site like AR15.com ought to be related to, hmm let's see, maybe AR15 rifles and associated products. There's enough politics around already without involving them here. That's my 2 cents.
Opinions are like a**holes, everyone has one; and they all stink. |
|
Quoted: well for one the beekeeper1 just locked another damn post that did not cross any lines only because he thought it might be trolling. what bullshit! edited because i would have kept my mouth shut for the rest of the night BUT NO another lock View Quote I'll tell you what is bullshit. Bullshit is when you accuse me of of locking a post "that did not cross any lines." Here is my explanation for the lock: Quoted: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tonys68l36, this thread appears to be pure trolling as the "story" is a nearly exact duplicate of another one recently posted. I am locking it for that reason. If it is a true, sincere story please contact me and I will gladly unlock it. Guys, please, let's get back to "normal"--without racist/hateful/unproductive crap. Please. Thanks! View Quote There was a response by Tonys68l36 in another thread. Here it is, where he admits to trolling: Quoted: DAGNABBIT LOCK EM ALL!!!! My thread just got nailed...guess they are not gonna make me a Mod. Oh well I tried...looked like a pretty good way to make "Mod" status. View Quote |
|
Quoted: exactly stormbringer grow up, i did not get a chance to tell you that i do not poke sticks at animals at the zoo, but you had to throw your jab. View Quote LOL>.. No jj....your post was childish and akin to poking sticks. That is the point I was and am trying to make... |
|
How about if the Mods ease up a bit in the everyday, garden variety flame war or relatively harmless trolling. In return, we the membership, will tacitly agree to stay away from a few 'hot-button' topics such as racism and member vs. member bashing.
Another thing, I know that most of the current Mods were Mods in other forums and as team members, we had no idea that their antagonist in a flame war was a Mod. This lead to a great deal of liberty in the exchange of conflicting idea. I assume that in addition to not having the Mod standard in the GD forum, they also did not have the Mod power of enforcement when away from their regular Mod forum. The fix for this is to return to relatively few Mods in the GD forum, we really can police ourselves. Leave us alone as a Mod and join us as a fellow member!! |
|
I am REALLY new here and really don't care about the pissy posts. I just don't read them. ...but why not make a special "FLAME FORUM" for people to fight it out. If someone posts a flame in the wrong forum, just transfer it to the FLAME and put a notice on the original locked forum as to where it can be found. Put a cool disclaimer on it saying the owners of the site hold no responsibility for what goes on inside and put your best mods in it. Kinda like a play pen for the people that can't play nicely ;)
|
|
Alrighty, my .02...
There has been an increase lately in both overactive moderation [i]and[/i] overactive trolling. If I had to guess, I'd say the overactive trolling came first, but not by much. I think the problem is that we hit that point in the cycle where people were starting to get pissy with each other (I think it last peaked in April or May) at the same time we got some new mods. I like BenDover and thebeekeeper1. Liked both their contributions in the past, and I thought they were both good pics for mods. I also think they've been a little quick on the trigger, and I think BenDover's got to either be a referee or a fighter. Not both. And that goes for all the mods. You can't get in the pissing matches, and then drop the blade when things get hairy. Call it one of the drawbacks to being a mod. So, how to fix it? First, people need to chill the fuck out. [b]This is not real life.[/b] People post, people get offended, people get over it. Second, everyone has a responsibility to this board, whether you're "on the team" or not. It's a big sandbox, and there's room for a lot of diverse opinions, but the trolling - and by that I mean posts that have no purpose other than to inflame passions and rile people up - has been on the increase, and it should stop. If you get your jollies by pissing people off over the internet, you need to get a life. Finally, electing mods is nonsense. This is not a democracy. Goatboy and staff run the show. All this whining about "we should get to pick the mods" is bullshit. If you don't like what's happening, do something constructive to fix it. You and I don't run the show; we're guests here. This is the best site on the net, and it hasn't gotten that way by letting whiney bitches run the show. The conduct code is real easy to follow - if you think something in a post might be in violation, it probably is, and you should ask yourself what, if anything, constructive would come of posting it. Again, because I think it's important, it's [i]everyone's[/i] responsibility. Not just the staff, not just the mods. I don't care who first said it, we should all make an effort to "all just get along". Rant off. edited for grammar. |
|
How about if we get rid of the moderators but don't tell anyone. Then run a script that deletes a thread silently the moment the 2nd person posts "IBTL".
|
|
People want to "elect" moderators?
What are you stoned? When did this become a democracy? This is GOatboys realm, don't like that? Don't let the door hit you in the ass then. Is it so hard to realize that goatboy is 100% responisble for what is posted here? Is it too much to ask that in that case, he "hire" mod's whom he knows and trusts? You whiners want the power to lock threads, but none of the financial and civil obligation that comes with owining this clubhouse of ours. Elect moderators? Not a chance, we don't need mob rule here, it isn't about a popularity contest, it is about protecting our home. I don't want to leave that up to popular whim, I want it left up to the person with whom the buck stops, namely goatboy, and anyone that goatboy nominates for that position. As to locked threads, I haven't seen one yet that I wouldn't have also locked, you aren't "owed" an explanation for anything, jeez, if goatboy was handing out $100.00 bills you people would be bitching because they had creases. Get a grip and start being a little thankful that we have this place, stop shitting in the living room. |
|
I like the idea of voting for mods, even though it won't change anything, the rules here are simple and any mod is required to lock certian threads no matter who is doing the moderating. However I don't think a mod should have to justify why they lock a particular thread. Rules are rules and if you can't follow them you get locked. By nature of our pro-gun politics we are fighters at heart, but sometimes that energy gets misplaced and we fight amongst ourselves. We are not here to be PC, that is by defenition the furthest thing from the truth, given our constant battle against draconian gun laws. Granted there will always be those undisciplined sh*tbirds who try to push everything to the limit and disrespect other members. Some people who post here are trouble makers and someone has to have the unpleasant and unpopular job of handling them, I think it would be tougher than I imagine to be a fair mod on such a large and diverse board. This place is like a large family to me and there will be disagreements between us, but let's handle it in a mature, responsible way and there should be less problems with locked threads.
|
|
I think its just a result of the sudden flood of new mods. Let everybody get done seeing how the lock button works and get the power trip over with, and thing will be back to normal.
|
|
ok, bendover, thebeekeeper1 at least between
you and i lets call a truce. i will back off if you do the same. my hand is out, will you shake? |
|
Quoted: I think its just a result of the sudden flood of new mods. Let everybody get done seeing how the lock button works and get the power trip over with, and thing will be back to normal. View Quote There was no "flood" of new Mods. There are a couple of new people but most were mods in handgun and the ak boards. They ended up here when we went with the one GD forum. Some are staff now. There is some good feedback here. Keep it coming. |
|
simple- make me a mod... [}:D]
and i missed something, whats all this IBTL crap? |
|
Quoted: ok, bendover, thebeekeeper1 at least between you and i lets call a truce. i will back off if you do the same. my hand is out, will you shake? View Quote Absolutely. Friends henceforth. This is my only intention with you and all other Members. All, feel free to contact me. I check my IM/E-mail throughout the day and half the night. I assure you, my heart is in the right place. |
|
One point, so everyone knows, GoatBoy asks us to post the reason for thread locks, quoting the CC rule that the thread/post violates. This is to be done every time, to avoid confusion/hard feelings. Please don't go berserk if one of us fails to do so though. [:D]
|
|
Quoted: ok, bendover, thebeekeeper1 at least between you and i lets call a truce. i will back off if you do the same. my hand is out, will you shake? View Quote Check your IM. |
|
Actually - I was only half joking about deleting "Why was my thread locked.!?" threads on IRC the other evening. If there is a problem with the policing of this board, it's that it's too visible. Any whining should be done privately between the lockee and the mod(s).
As for the rash of locked threads... An ancient Jewish proverb says "Drive out a mocker, and out goes strife. Quarrels and insults are ended." Shoot the ringleaders first. |
|
Great Idea, why stop there why don't we just elect who will buy and own this place also!
Yahoo I vote for me owning and paying for this place! Oh no on secound thought I just don't have the money ,nor the wisdom to promote those to staff or to be moderate in their decisions. Hey just go with the flow(you might even think about becomming a Team Member) before you think of changing things here. ] Edited to say damn excuse me dude as you are a Team Member(sounded like some one wanted this to become a demockracy) Just a thought. Bob [:D] |
|
Voting on mods is a bad idea. Those who lose and their supporters will be in the minority and claim that they are "disenfranchised" or something. Random selection of paid members would be better than voting.
I have no problem with the mod team as it is now. I think they are all stand-up guys (and gals, as the case may be). What I tire of is watching mods and members go back and forth on the same damn topic in different threads over and over again, day after day. If I could make a suggestion or two: 1. Mods, don't get sucked into flame wars. Further, don't get martyr syndrome in a thread you hate. It makes you look bad, and the other side will complain and post numerous "Why was my thread locked, so-and-so mod is an ass" etc threads. I don't mean so far as to not participate, but don't get baited into a discussion by morons. 2. New forum: Gas Chamber. Instead of locking threads, send them here. You must be logged in to access this forum. This is where threads go to die. That way, a thread is still open for those who wish to scream until they are either blue in the face or alone. Maybe both. Either way, less bitching, and the trolls will stay there. This new forum needs only one mod and only one rule - after an hour of inactivity, any thread is subject to a lock or deletion at the moderator's discretion. 3. Leave GenDis as-is, with the code of conduct in place. If a thread goes over the line, Gas it with a reason (as opposed to locking with a reason). If someone starts a bitch-thread about the gassed thread, delete it. Their thread is still active, and those who wish may still partake of it in the Gas Chamber. Problems solved. Next? the_reject |
|
What reject said,but you could gas it then allow them a rebutale with say twenty five words or less,then say ten words or less,then five words or less, then just two- good bbye.
Bob [8D] |
|
2. New forum: Gas Chamber. Instead of locking threads, send them here. You must be logged in to access this forum. This is where threads go to die. That way, a thread is still open for those who wish to scream until they are either blue in the face or alone. Maybe both. Either way, less bitching, and the trolls will stay there. View Quote Best idea all night. Do this!! Once the thread is in the "Gas Chamber" it will live for 3-5 days or 12 hours of inactivity then get deleted. |
|
2. New forum: Gas Chamber. Instead of locking threads, send them here. You must be logged in to access this forum... View Quote I'd restrict it further if possible - You must have been a participant in the thread to see a thread in purgatory. |
|
Quoted: 2. New forum: Gas Chamber. Instead of locking threads, send them here. You must be logged in to access this forum... View Quote I'd restrict it further if possible - You must have been a participant in the thread to see a thread in purgatory. View Quote That would be hell to code for our poor GoatBoy! The 1 hour of inactivity rule would suffice perfectly. Eventually, any remaining participants in a gassed thread will get tired of it and leave. After an hour, the Gas Chamber mod can lock or delete the thread on his or her whim. the_reject |
|
Quoted: 2. New forum: Gas Chamber. Instead of locking threads, send them here. You must be logged in to access this forum. This is where threads go to die. That way, a thread is still open for those who wish to scream until they are either blue in the face or alone. Maybe both. Either way, less bitching, and the trolls will stay there. View Quote Best idea all night. Do this!! Once the thread is in the "Gas Chamber" it will live for 3-5 days or 12 hours of inactivity then get deleted. View Quote |
|
Quoted: I'm not sure this is the answer, but Full-Auto does this. When a couple of guys just start rolling around in the shit they send it to "Rant" I never thought much about it but I guess it does let guys duke it out in peace without disturbing everyone else. On the other hand Full-Auto has no advertisers etc so they can be a lot looser with what topics they allow. View Quote Anything F/A can do, we can do better. Disallowing posting of new topics in the Gas Chamber would prevent it from being a hang out for the stupid-with-a-point-to-prove. I'm fairly certain this could be coded without too much hassle. The point of the Gas Chamber wouldn't be so that troublesome threads could just go somewhere else to continue on in a flame-fest, it should be so that troublesome threads can DIE QUICKLY. Kind of like how an animal will just wander out and hole up somewhere when it knows it's about that time, except in this case, we show the animal where the hole is. The stigma should be that if you are still perpetuating a discussion in a gassed thread, you are obviously a moron not to be taken seriously. Ever. the_reject |
|
Quoted: well, we can start by making the MOD selection process open to the users, like an election, rather than buddies choosing buddies. and how about keeping tabs on who locks what topics and having them justify to EVERYONE in the open exactly WHY the thread was locked. View Quote me too |
|
Here's my opinion for a fix:
1) Limit moderating powers in a forum to Admin, Sr. Staff, Staff, and moderators of that forum only. 2) Create a "Trash can" type forum to move locked threads to so that they don't stare everyone in the face and give them ideas but they are still available to read so that the pertinent information can still be read by those who were interested in the original topic. 3) A locked thread must [b]always[/b] have an explanation and list the conduct code section that was violated or else it can not be locked. 4) Stop locking threads that have one bad post in them, there is a delete/edit function you know. 5) Moderators, staff, and Sr. Staff should be subject to disciplinary action when there actions seem biased. An example would be 3 strikes = loss of powers for one week, 6 strikes = loss of powers for eternity. I don't know if there are currently any mods who are non-paying members but I do feel that at least one would be fair in both GD and GFD so as to give a fair chance to "Members" when "Team Members" start coming down on them for any number of reasons including accusing them of trolling just because they don't pay. I think these rules would calm everything down quite a bit. Jake |
|
Personally, I think that an election for MOD's, is NOT a good idea. GoatBoy has done a great job selecting MOD's, and I only have a small problem with a couple of them. And that in time I am sure will resolve itself.
Don't take it all so serious, laugh a little, make fun of those that post BS. Don't take it get personal, it is the internet for crying out loud. Be a man, we get pissed and happy in the same hour, in real life. So don't be any different here. If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. And if it is clearly racist/bigotry, lock it and dump it. But I do think inuendo is another thing altogether. I would prefer it to be left alone to continue until it dies of it's own accord, or it becomes crystal clear. You asked for input, I gave it. dave |
|
EVERYBODY is overreacting. This sight goes through ups and downs. Trolls and Aholes come in waves...if we ignore them ..they will, and always have, gone away. Only recently have we let these idiotic threads start flame wars among the regulars here. The only action that should be taken IMHO is for everyone to calm down and ride this wave of Aholes out. We need to stick together.
|
|
I agree with offspring, have a "flaming" forum. If you don't like what someone else says, STOP READING IT!!!!!!!!!!! This forum is about both the 1st and 2nd amendments, isn't it.
the-reject seems to have a good idea or two himself. Anyway what is IBTF???? |
|
Quoted: Here's my opinion for a fix: 1) Limit moderating powers in a forum to Admin, Sr. Staff, Staff, and moderators of that forum only. View Quote This is exactly how it is. The list at the right on the main forum screen is it. The only ones who have "magic powers" in each forum are those listed, even though the title now appears in all forums a Mod inhabits since the new site upgrade. 2) Create a "Trash can" type forum to move locked threads to so that they don't stare everyone in the face and give them ideas but they are still available to read so that the pertinent information can still be read by those who were interested in the original topic. View Quote It already exists as a repository for outrageous threads, but cannot be accessed by Members. It is at the bottom of the list. 3) A locked thread must [b]always[/b] have an explanation and list the conduct code section that was violated or else it can not be locked. View Quote This is precisely what we are instructed to do. I have each time I found it necessary to lock a thread, and I'm sure any oversights by others were unintentional. The Board has gone down several times today which made it difficult to do it though, as the lock and explanation post have to be done separately. 4) Stop locking threads that have one bad post in them, there is a delete/edit function you know. View Quote We are not allowed to delete for legal reasons and edits are to be done "rarely, if at all," according to GB. Usually, we ask the poster to edit his own post, and give the reason, then lock if he/she refuses. It is ironic the Membership blames the Mod/Staff for locks when the poster is the real culprit. 5) Moderators, staff, and Sr. Staff should be subject to disciplinary action when there actions seem biased. An example would be 3 strikes = loss of powers for one week, 6 strikes = loss of powers for eternity. View Quote We serve at GoatBoy's pleasure and this would be a nightmare for him, IMO. If we do well we get an occasional pat on the head from I-don't-know-who-because-it-hasn't-happened-yet, but when we do bad or err, we are kicked in the nuts repeatedly by a long line of willing participants. [:D] I don't know if there are currently any mods who are non-paying members but I do feel that at least one would be fair in both GD and GFD so as to give a fair chance to "Members" when "Team Members" start coming down on them for any number of reasons including accusing them of trolling just because they don't pay. View Quote Goatboy chooses his Mods/Staff based upon his own secret criteria that is a mystery to all of us. I seriously doubt this would make a difference. The "Member" Mod would still be subject to the above gonad-kicking when he locked his first thread, trust me. I think these rules would calm everything down quite a bit. Jake View Quote Thank you for such a constructive and thoughtful post. I hope my own thoughts clarify some things, and give you something to think about in others. As a "family" everything will be worked out and we will be back to fighting our true enemies in no time. Thanks again! |
|
eswanson is right in line with my thoughts.
I wasn't aware that my "moderator" powers extended beyond the forum that I was listed in. I wouldn't use them else where anyway as I aways use my God-like powers for good. You are allowed to vote off moderators by sending complaints to the staff. I get both fan mail (thanks mom) and hate mail (take it easy will ya' my ISP limits me to 10 Mb). Seriously you can't take the mission seriously. As was pointed out this isn't real life! When someone sends me a complaint I might not comply with the person bitching but I will read the thing and understand where the guy is coming from at least. It's only fair. The guy might not be right as far as the forum rules are concerned but he is right as far as he is concerned. I do moderate my moderation. I do also get pleas from people to lock or delete threads that have gone to the dogs. For the most part it is the same trouble makers time and time again over the same few issues: racism, abortion, and religion (and the USS Liberty! [:p]). This is a cycle where the crap gets posted, moderated, spawned again, locked, and then the moderator bashing starts. It doesn't help that school is out, welfare checks have arrived, and the moon is full. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.