Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Posted: 10/13/2005 5:17:02 PM EDT
If the 94' AWB were still active and these firearms (PS-90 and FS2000) were not a Named inclusion, would they be legal?

From the thread FN Rep. Training.

As *I* see it, no. No folding stock, no conspicuous grip protruding from the bottom.

What is your take?
Link Posted: 10/13/2005 5:21:28 PM EDT
The mags are the real issue.
Link Posted: 10/13/2005 5:23:38 PM EDT
Oh, I'm willing to bet the AWB would be "revised" real quick to include all such weapons. Heck, it might've even been revised to ban all bullpups, period, with the justification that "It's just too easy to illegally SBR a bullpup".
Link Posted: 10/13/2005 5:25:16 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/13/2005 5:26:14 PM EDT by clement]
Doesn't the Thumbhole stock count as an evil feature?
Link Posted: 10/13/2005 5:25:39 PM EDT
As a ban-stater, I thought about this myself.

I would find it hard to believe that the grip on those weapons would withstand any scrutiny... in such a case it would be safe to have a bare muzzle or perm. attached compensator.

Outside of getting rid of the FS and threads, I don't see a problem.


- BG
Link Posted: 10/13/2005 5:36:29 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Cypher214:
The mags are the real issue.



Yeah, other than the High Cap mags, forgot about that part.
Link Posted: 10/13/2005 5:38:37 PM EDT
they are making 10rd p90 mags...
Link Posted: 10/13/2005 7:47:37 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Ring:
they are making 10rd p90 mags...



Well as deadly as the VPC is making it out to be, ya only need 1.
Top Top