Member Login
Posted: 9/17/2009 4:52:30 PM EST
Ok, this is really stupid, but we can't figure this one out.
We need to solve this inequality. 3/(x1)  4/x >= 1 So x =/= 1 or 0 We bring the 1 over so we have 3/(x1)  4/x  1 >= 0 Then get a common denominator and simplify (x^2 2x +4)/(x(x1)) >= 0 What now? That numerator doesn't factor 


The key is to get rid of the fractions by multiplying everything by a common denominator, in this case x(x1):
3x(x1)/(x1)  4x(x1)/x >= x(x1) 3x 4(x1) >= x(x1) 3x 4x + 4 >= x^2  x 4 >= x^2 x <= 2 

Gun control is not the answer. Gun control is the question. The answer is NO.

Originally Posted By wheel:
The key is to get rid of the fractions by multiplying everything by a common denominator, in this case x(x1): 3x(x1)/(x1)  4x(x1)/x >= x(x1) 3x 4(x1) >= x(x1) 3x 4x + 4 >= x^2  x 4 >= x^2 x <= 2 Maybe, I dunno. Our Professor made a whole big deal about not multiplying by the denominator today. Can't quite remember why though. 


Uhh..... it works. Try plugging in 2 for x, then try 1.9 for instance.
ETA: actually I goofed on the last line: x^2 <= 4 2 >= x <= 2 

Gun control is not the answer. Gun control is the question. The answer is NO.

Edit again:
This is what I got 2<=x<0 1<x<=2 

"If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits eightyeight miles per hour... you're gonna see some serious shit"

Simple?
1 + X = 2 is simple 3/(x1)  4/x >= 1 So x =/= 1 or 0 is not! 


Originally Posted By Feier:
Originally Posted By wheel:
The key is to get rid of the fractions by multiplying everything by a common denominator, in this case x(x1): 3x(x1)/(x1)  4x(x1)/x >= x(x1) 3x 4(x1) >= x(x1) 3x 4x + 4 >= x^2  x 4 >= x^2 x <= 2 Maybe, I dunno. Our Professor made a whole big deal about not multiplying by the denominator today. Can't quite remember why though. Hes an idiot. EDIT the only time you have to worry about multipling or dividing on an inequallity is when you are x or / by a negative number. 

Obama the answer to WTF?

Originally Posted By nicholsmf:
Simple? 1 + X = 2 is simple 3/(x1)  4/x >= 1 So x =/= 1 or 0 is not! compared to a triple integral, its is simple 

Does "vaporized" mean nothing happened to it?

Originally Posted By nicholsmf:
Simple? 1 + X = 2 is simple 3/(x1)  4/x >= 1 So x =/= 1 or 0 is not! Not dividing by 0 IS simple. 

"During the second 100 days, we will design, build and open a library dedicated to my first 100 days." Barack Obama, May 9 2009

1) Bring the 1 over: 3/(x1)  4/x  1 >= 0.
2) Multiply by common denominator: 3x  4(x1) / x(x1)  x(x1) / x(x1) >= 0. 3) Combine: 3x  4x + 4 x^2 + x / x(x1) >= 0. 4) Combine: 4  x^2 / x(x1) >= 0. 5) Factor numerator: (2+x) (2x) / x(x1) >= 0. For simplicity, we will call the left side of this inequality f(x). 6) Note: f(x) can change signs only when there is a zero in the numerator or denominator. i.e. x = 2, 0, 1, 2. So we must check the intervals on both sides of these critical points. 7) Check interval x < 2: (plug in x = 3), f(x) < 0, so this is NOT part of the solution set for f(x) >= 0. 8) Check interval 2 < x < 0 (plug in x = 1), f(x) > 0, so this IS part of the solution set for f(x) >= 0. 9) Check interval 0 < x < 1 (plug in x = 1/2), f(x) < 0, so this is NOT part of the solution set for f(x) >= 0. 10) Check interval 1 < x < 2 (plug in x = 3/2), f(x) > 0, so this IS part of the solution set for f(x) >= 0. 11) Check interval x > 2 (plug in x = 3), f(x) < 0, so this is NOT part of the solution set for f(x) >= 0. So our solution set is: { 2 <= x < 0, 1 < x <= 2 }. (Note that f(x) is undefined for x = 0 and x = 1). 

Death before dishonor.
"Ever notice how you come across somebody once in awhile that you shouldn't have fucked with? That's me." 
I believe the MathFu in this post is weak...........
your teacher is correct as far as I know, you can not multiply by the denominator when working with INEQUALITIES You have to get each section to have the same denominator though .. x(x1) first subtract one from both sides then multiply each section by a unit of one be it x/x, x1/x1, x(x1)/x(x1) 3x 4(x1) x(x1) >= 0 ––––  ––––––––  –––––– x(x1) x(x1) x(x1) then combine all over one denominator 3x  4(x1)  x(x1) >= 0 –––––––––––––––––––––––– x(x1) simplifiy 3x  4x +4  x^2 + x >= 0 –––––––––––––––––––––– x(x1) simplify x^2 + 4 >= 0 –––––––––– x(x1) factor (x2)(x2) >= 0 –––––––––––––– x(x1) solve each factor equal to zero, this gives your points where the line crosses zero and changes signs x= 2, 2, 0, 1 plot matrix for sign of each factor when between each point, then at the bottom of matrix multiply signs, ie *=+, *+=, +*+=+ 2 0 1 2 x   + + + x2 +     x2     + x1    + + ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––  +  +  only the region with positives are greater than zero as required above with the equation >= 0 thus 2 <= x < 0 and 1 < x <= 2 , x can not be = to 0 or 1 since they are the cross points found in the denominator [2,0),(1,2] I think F* math equations on forums, the format gets screwed up damn, seconds to late Mudfish's MathFu is strong 


Originally Posted By nicholsmf:
Simple? 1 + X = 2 is simple 3/(x1)  4/x >= 1 So x =/= 1 or 0 is not! It's damn simple compared to Triple Integrals, Complex Partial Differential Equations, and Fourier Series. 


AR15.COM is the world’s largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiats of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiats, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 19962020 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.