User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:02:19 PM EDT
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:07:15 PM EDT
[#1]
Well that was anti climactic....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:07:20 PM EDT
[#2]
"Male" "Female"?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:08:57 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted: From wiki:"Male" "Female"? A requirement was found for two types of armament, so Mark Is were armed either with 6 pounder guns and four machine guns and called "Male" (75) or two Vickers machine guns instead of the 6 pounders and called "Female" (75).[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_I_tank#cite_note-1][2][/url]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:09:48 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
Quoted:
From wiki:"Male" "Female"? A requirement was found for two types of armament, so Mark Is were armed either with 6 pounder guns and four machine guns and called "Male" (75) or two Vickers machine guns instead of the 6 pounders and called "Female" (75).[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_I_tank#cite_note-1][2][/url]
Thanks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:10:44 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
"Male" "Female"? Big gun vs small gun |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:12:30 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Quoted:
"Male" "Female"? Big gun vs small gun Ah... cock vs. clit. Got it. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:15:56 PM EDT
[#7]
That was cool.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:36:05 PM EDT
[#8]
LOL, kind of like two nearly blind guys wearing body armor in wheelchairs with dodgeballs.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:46:28 PM EDT
[#9]
That was like watching old people f*ck
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:47:52 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted: That was like watching old people f*ck Eeuuuwwww. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 3:57:06 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
That was like watching old people f*ck 
That A7V was as big as a house. Amazing how far tank technology has come in less than 100 years. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 4:06:06 PM EDT
[#12]
Ooh, snail warfare. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 4:22:26 PM EDT
[#13]
Yeah, I would have thought that tank warfare would have been much more dynamic in WWI. I guess they were trying to get the tanks to be all things to all people - cross a 10 ft ditch, become a portable machine-gun station, etc. They should have used light, quick tanks with machine guns as breakout weapons.
Would have worked better. As I recall, France was headed that way at the close of the war with the FT17 (?). |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 4:25:05 PM EDT
[#14]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 4:27:37 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Yeah, I would have thought that tank warfare would have been much more dynamic in WWI. This is sarcasm right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 7:28:36 PM EDT
[#16]
Don't forget the hermaphrodite tanks.
They had a 6lbr on one side, and the MGs on the other. NTM |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2009 7:35:44 PM EDT
[#17]
Guten TAG
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
