User Panel
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:03:43 AM EDT
I don't get it? It seems like a complete slam dunk to me.
He has opportunity after opportunity to absolulty wipe the floor with the witch but he doesn't go for the knockout. In all three debates she left herself wide open on multiple occasions for a knockout blow and all he does is a jab here and there. It's like he can't focus or doesn't realize how big of a deal the email leaks, video leaks, the Clinton foundation scam, and Benghazi cover ups really are with the American public. He could literally sit there and say "emails, Clinton foundation scam, emails, Benghazi cover up, DNC election video" and he'd have this shit wrapped up. Why is he not taking off the gloves and hammering the bitch? Are some of these topics so taboo that even he won't touch them? Is there some kind of gentlemans agreement in Washington that you don't use this kind of evidence against your opponent? Are the emails and videos so shaky that he doesn't feel confident using them against her? If I was in his shoes I would personally pay to have the highlights of the leaked DNC election fraud video aired on live TV every night, a dozen times a night, until Nov. 8th. Why is he being a pussy about it? |
|
I feel like he's done a better job of taking the gloves off than any Republican presidential candidate before him.
|
|
At this point just vote and encourage other like minded people to do the same.
|
|
Election fraud wont change a voters vote.
150 million women voters and a lot believe in what they say about his past. You also dont know how hes really doing because of the media |
|
I noticed that too. He missed multiple options to hit her hard. In the last debate he mentioned her paying people to cause violence at his rallies. She COMPLETELY dodged it and he said nothing. Then she even called him out on violence at his rallies (something about punches thrown) and the fucking idiot missed the opportunity to call her out on it. She then talked about how Donald whines that everything is rigged, how the WI primary was rigged and again the fucking idiot said nothing. At the very least he should have said "you'd know a lot about rigged primaries.."
|
|
|
It's his third one on one debate of his life, being watched by millions of people. He did a great job, considering. Sure, he didn't completely blow her out of the water in the third debate, but for the most part maintained composure, got some good jabs in, and didn't completely fall apart.
Would I have liked him to put more effort into practicing? Absolutely. But he seems content spending his time rallying and traveling around the country rather than retreating to Transylvania for a week to prepare for the debate like Hillary. |
|
|
Quoted: He could literally sit there and say "emails, Clinton foundation scam, emails, Benghazi cover up, DNC election video" and he'd have this shit wrapped up. View Quote LOL, Congress did exactly for 2 years and what happened from it? NOTHING! Those issues have been beat to death. There are other issues such as "she has been in politics for 30 years and hasn't fixed anything" or "she takes money from countries that treat women like property". His attacks should be on how she has failed the average joe and sold them out for money and power. |
|
because it wont matter
no one who is voting for her gives a shit, and undecided voters don't like either candidate enough to trust one on the thoughts of the other. |
|
Disclaimer for mouth breathers: I'm voting for Trump on 11/08/16.
After each debate, I have been frustrated that Trump hasn't hammered Hillary over these issues. Instead, I believe that his ego draws him into a pissing match over trivial issues rather than focusing on Hillary's obvious faults and glaring evidence of her corruption and habitual dishonesty. The sad truth is that Trump is a poorly prepared and poorly vetted candidate. During the primary, his politically incorrect statements played well with the R base. I was disappointed that Rand Paul or at least Ted Cruz didn't win the primary, but their message didn't resonate with the republican base. Say what you want about Ted Cruz or Rand Paul, but either would be destroying HRC in these debates. |
|
Quoted:
Disclaimer for mouth breathers: I'm voting for Trump on 11/08/16. After each debate, I have been frustrated that Trump hasn't hammered Hillary over these issues. Instead, I believe that his ego draws him into a pissing match over trivial issues rather than focusing on Hillary's obvious faults and glaring evidence of her corruption and habitual dishonesty. The sad truth is that Trump is a poorly prepared and poorly vetted candidate. During the primary, his politically incorrect statements played well with the R base. I was disappointed that Rand Paul or at least Ted Cruz didn't win the primary, but their message didn't resonate with the republican base. Say what you want about Ted Cruz or Rand Paul, but either would be destroying HRC in these debates. View Quote Ted Cruz would certainly annihilate most people in a debate, but how would he handle being dragged through the mud, with tons of false allegations. Let us not forget Romney, the Murderer with Binders Full of Women, who is literally Hitler, and how he countered with Obama calling him a nice guy who he merely disagrees with on policy. |
|
Quoted:
Disclaimer for mouth breathers: I'm voting for Trump on 11/08/16. After each debate, I have been frustrated that Trump hasn't hammered Hillary over these issues. Instead, I believe that his ego draws him into a pissing match over trivial issues rather than focusing on Hillary's obvious faults and glaring evidence of her corruption and habitual dishonesty. The sad truth is that Trump is a poorly prepared and poorly vetted candidate. During the primary, his politically incorrect statements played well with the R base. I was disappointed that Rand Paul or at least Ted Cruz didn't win the primary, but their message didn't resonate with the republican base. Say what you want about Ted Cruz or Rand Paul, but either would be destroying HRC in these debates. View Quote And outside the debates they are unlikeable to the average American moron and would draw less votes than Romney. |
|
|
he simply doesn't have the skills, knowledge, or temperament to land knockout blows in a general election 1-to-1 scenario.
staying on point and hammering her is just not what he does, because at the end of the day it always has to be about self-aggrandizement. |
|
I've watched Trump hammer Clinton for months. There must be 2 Trumps running for President.
|
|
Quoted:
I noticed that too. He missed multiple options to hit her hard. In the last debate he mentioned her paying people to cause violence at his rallies. She COMPLETELY dodged it and he said nothing. Then she even called him out on violence at his rallies (something about punches thrown) and the fucking idiot missed the opportunity to call her out on it. She then talked about how Donald whines that everything is rigged, how the WI primary was rigged and again the fucking idiot said nothing. At the very least he should have said "you'd know a lot about rigged primaries.." View Quote Agreed. It was easy to come up with snappy retorts and attacks and he just circled back randomly missing a lot of guaranteed hits. He needed Adderall or something. |
|
What makes you think he's not?? The modern media polls will NEVER show a Republican presidential candidate leading, get used to that.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Libs simply spinning it as him taking it too far with the media comment and Hillary keeping it more playful. They claimed she was better received. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess you didn't see the roast last night? Libs simply spinning it as him taking it too far with the media comment and Hillary keeping it more playful. They claimed she was better received. Everything I read or saw today about that event focused on him getting booed when he made his remarks. |
|
Quoted:
he simply doesn't have the skills, knowledge, or temperament to land knockout blows in a general election 1-to-1 scenario. staying on point and hammering her is just not what he does, because at the end of the day it always has to be about self-aggrandizement. View Quote You don't know what you're talking about. Which election have you been watching? |
|
My jaws dropped when she threw him those and other softballs and he didn't follow through on them.
|
|
Quoted:
What makes you think he's not?? The modern media polls will NEVER show a Republican presidential candidate leading, get used to that. View Quote I am not talking about polls or what the MSM has to say. I am talking about what I have seen and heard with my own two eyes in the debates, radio ads, to commercials, etc... It's frustrating to see him argue over something stupid like which foundation (Trump vs Clinton) donates more to the poor. I don't care, America doesn't care. He gets so side tracked on semantics and just biffs it when he has a chance to blow her out of the water. |
|
Quoted:
You don't know what you're talking about. Which election have you been watching? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
he simply doesn't have the skills, knowledge, or temperament to land knockout blows in a general election 1-to-1 scenario. staying on point and hammering her is just not what he does, because at the end of the day it always has to be about self-aggrandizement. You don't know what you're talking about. Which election have you been watching? I know exactly what I'm talking about. If you don't see that it's all about about self-aggrandizement for him, you're simply blind. |
|
Quoted:
Disclaimer for mouth breathers: I'm voting for Trump on 11/08/16. After each debate, I have been frustrated that Trump hasn't hammered Hillary over these issues. Instead, I believe that his ego draws him into a pissing match over trivial issues rather than focusing on Hillary's obvious faults and glaring evidence of her corruption and habitual dishonesty. The sad truth is that Trump is a poorly prepared. View Quote This is how fell as well. |
|
Trump went up in the polls when he talked about substance. He has us now he needs those in the middle. It's all about turnout
|
|
Quoted:
he simply doesn't have the skills, knowledge, or temperament to land knockout blows in a general election 1-to-1 scenario. staying on point and hammering her is just not what he does, because at the end of the day it always has to be about self-aggrandizement. View Quote Trump is simply incapable of staying on topic, dodging barbs, and prosecuting an argument. He doesn't have the temperament or intelligence. Full disclosure, I will be voting for the orange idiot. He appears to have ADD, he bounces all over the place and can't seem to complete a sentence. |
|
|
|
He is hammering her. Every day. But the media's protection is hard to get through.
|
|
|
Quoted:
I know exactly what I'm talking about. If you don't see that it's all about about self-aggrandizement for him, you're simply blind. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
he simply doesn't have the skills, knowledge, or temperament to land knockout blows in a general election 1-to-1 scenario. staying on point and hammering her is just not what he does, because at the end of the day it always has to be about self-aggrandizement. You don't know what you're talking about. Which election have you been watching? I know exactly what I'm talking about. If you don't see that it's all about about self-aggrandizement for him, you're simply blind. Easy to make assertions that can't be proven and then call people around you oblivious. |
|
Quoted:
I know exactly what I'm talking about. If you don't see that it's all about about self-aggrandizement for him, you're simply blind. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
he simply doesn't have the skills, knowledge, or temperament to land knockout blows in a general election 1-to-1 scenario. staying on point and hammering her is just not what he does, because at the end of the day it always has to be about self-aggrandizement. You don't know what you're talking about. Which election have you been watching? I know exactly what I'm talking about. If you don't see that it's all about about self-aggrandizement for him, you're simply blind. It's *never* been about Making America Great. It's always been about Making Trump Great. |
|
He brought up everyone of those things you mentioned in the last debate. Except the Benghazi cover up, i dont think that came up.
|
|
|
He isnt a politician
Roger Ailes helped the 2nd debate when he destroyed her 3rd debate I think they told him to be Mr Nice guy or try to be more likeable or something Remember that most people are not like us as we want blood or death at minimum |
|
Why is this even a question after all these months.
It has been conveyed numerous times before, Donald lacks the ability to stay on message. He is a scatter brain. Adult ADD |
|
He missed a lot of easy targets. Did he ever bring up her "Reset" with Russia? Or the whole Clinton Foundation uranium deal? He had her in a bad spot with the Bernie/Podesta questioning her judgement and she throws out Russia to get off it and he goes out in the weeds to talk about Putin and how great it would be to have a relationship with Russia. He should have immediately gone back to how people who know her question her judgement and decision making abilities.
|
|
Quoted:
He missed a lot of easy targets. Did he ever bring up her "Reset" with Russia? Or the whole Clinton Foundation uranium deal? He had her in a bad spot with the Bernie/Podesta questioning her judgement and she throws out Russia to get off it and he goes out in the weeds to talk about Putin and how great it would be to have a relationship with Russia. He should have immediately gone back to how people who know her question her judgement and decision making abilities. View Quote The "reset with Russia" thing is a ready-made attack point, especially since she's trying to tie him to Putin AND there's a fucking PROP associated with it that every American is familiar with. I'm sure it's against the debate rules to use props, but he should have said "fuck it' and whipped out an Easy Button as soon as she mentioned Russia. He's just too low-energy for something like that. |
|
I get so tired of seeing that stupid little smirk on her face in these debates.
It makes you just want to slap the shit out of her, looks like a damn beaver. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.