“There is a kind of nefarious block of the ‘safe harbor’ act — the Digital Millennium Copyright Act — that basically says that nobody, no musician, no individual can sue Facebook or Google, or YouTube, for posting stuff that they don’t have permission to. So this is why there are 55,000 ISIS videos on YouTube. Right? They claim, ‘We have no responsibility . . . it’s First Amendment rights. We don’t know.’ The only pushback they’ve gotten is from advertisers. Procter & Gamble said, ‘Hey, we’re not so comfortable with our advertising being on terrorist videos. Stop it, please.’ Now they say, ‘Oh, there’s too many videos being uploaded to YouTube, we can’t control it.’

“But you notice there’s no porn on YouTube. So why is that? That’s because they have A.I., artificial intelligence algorithms, that when someone tries to upload porn, it sees a bare breast and it stops it and puts it into a separate queue where a human looks at it and says, ‘Well, is this National Geographic video? Or is this porn?’ And if it’s porn, it doesn’t go up, and if it’s National Geographic, it does go up. Well, they could do the same thing with ISIS videos. As you well know — any of you who’ve ever used [the music recognition app] Shazam — they can do the same thing with every tune, every movie, that someone doesn’t want up there, in three seconds the audio signature would tell them, ‘This is something we don’t want’ and stop it.

Link

because all of those things will not put someone in jail while all it takes is nudies of a 17 year 364 day  old to put someone's ass in jail.

Because it's easy to rub one out to live murder and beheadings, porn not so much.

"Gets a pass" on what?

A.W.D.

Our country was founded largely by bible thumpers fleeing all the crazy sex of Europe.  They had no issues smoking any MFer's that got in the way of their colonization.

As a result titties = bad; violence = meh...

I fap to both so it doesn't affect me.

That question sounds very similar to one that gets posed about another website...

They also filter out the truth. Remember last election?

That Facebook live is just inviting the crazies to achieve leveled up notoriety.

Wait until a classroom of school children are slaughtered on it.

Turn that feature off.  I hope some victim sues suckerburg for all he's worth because he basically created a free murder/rape tv channel for degenerates.

There are people who will watch a movie that involves people getting murdered by being shot in the head, stabbed in the stomach, and even strangled with bare hands and they won't even flinch. Those same people will scream, faint, and fall out of their seats in shock if a nipple pops out.



I have come close to being asked to leave a residents for calling someone out on that.

Stop showing them your nipples then.

And news/stories favorable to conservatives:  not only filtered, but supplanted with "fake" news.

The US is rather prudish, just look at the movie rating system.

You can show all the gory violence you want and get a PG rating, show a naked booby for 1ms and you'll get an R rating.

These threads always make me laugh.

It presuposes that the OP is having a hard time finding fap material.

Here's a revolutionary thought, OP. Maybe people should be allowed to put/host what THEY want to on their websites and you can put/host what YOU want on yours.

I'm a photographer and it is exceptionally annoying trying to deal with Facebook and photographs and ads.  I can sit and scroll through my feed all day and see posts & ads from VS, La Perla, Agent P, etc that are scantily clad, even showing nipple through the fabric.  I try to boost a post or place an ad for a much less racy photo....rejected for suggestive content or excessive skin or suggestive posing.  Fucking annoying.

Create a porn site if you wish.  Not sure if you want FB promote your interest or restrict factual reports of less interest.

Larry Flint tried to make your point years ago and ended up getting shot for it.

Also from the article

“This is not the first time this has happened. If people who have mental illness or want to get fame use this platform to do horrible things, what is the good of it? This is the first broadcaster to claim they have no control. If it was a TV network . . . they’d have their license pulled. They’d be out of business the next day.
“People who own these platforms need to be more careful. We have to wonder if teaching these lone wolves is helpful to society? I don’t think I’m in the minority anymore. There is beginning to be a resistance. There was a point about a year-and-a-half ago where there were 44,000 ISIS videos . . . no porn, but plenty of beheadings under the guise of the First Amendment.”

Youtube must have changed something very recently because there used to be lots of porn posted.