Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 9/23/2005 12:26:27 PM EDT
A friend sent me this email which came from her university:


Recently, concerns have been raised by members of our community about incidents that have targeted our students based on their race or ethnicity.  We, too, are deeply concerned about these incidents.  Our University is constantly striving to create a community that embraces diversity and fosters a climate of respect, tolerance, inclusiveness, fairness, civility and safety.  We must not and will not tolerate actions that serve to target or intimidate members of our community based on race, ethnicity, gender or gender identity, sexual orientation, religious or political belief, national origin, or other personal characteristics.  When we learn of such incidents, we have a responsibility to address them promptly through education and dialogue and, where appropriate, disciplinary sanction or criminal prosecution.

We have no doubt that incidents of bias are more common in our community than official reports would indicate.  It also seems clear that we could do a better job of communicating to students and other community members the processes and support structures that already exist for reporting hate-related incidents and directing community members toward campus resources. We have asked our staff to pull together a more comprehensive communications effort to achieve this goal and make our processes more transparent and accessible.



Campus security in most schools do NOT carry firearms. NJIT, which is situated dead smack between Newark PD, Rutgers PD, and NJIT PD, have had cases where students were ROBBED AT GUNPOINT at night when walking through lit areas to the parking complex.

If students of legal age with CCWs were allowed to carry on campus grounds, there would be less crime. Worried about walking from class to class at night? Not a problem... concealed carry Glock 19 with tactical light and night sights.

It would be even better if the bill passes allowing deadly force without retreating to your registered domicile.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 1:13:41 PM EDT
[#1]
I guess a lot of people are too busy kissing the NRA's ass to realize this is why the 2nd amendment exists, and it's NOT to use a shotgun or bolt-gun to take down deer or have a turkey shoot or for sporting purposes. If someone or a group of people are going to fuck you up because of your race/ethnicity (or to rob you or to rape the women), you need to be able to at least legally defend yourself rather than cower in a corner especially if you're over 21, a citizen and can possess a CCW. The Democrats and the other associated political morons want you to depend on someone else... i.e. University security, who will have a response time of "Too Long" to be of any use other than to disperse the crowd that gathers around a corpse.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top