User Panel
I have the KMK678GC and the 5.5 inch blued bull barrel
I find the 678GC is more accurate. It has the target crown and the trigger is lighter. The 5.5 bull balaces a little better and does not have the thumbrest which lefties don;t like. If I had to buy just one for pure target shooting it would be the KMK678GC |
|
My choices are severly limited. I'm in MASS. Only place worse is komiefornia. |
|
|
Hey your last pic is incorrect. Thats a 22/45 not a mkIII
I prefer MKIIs also. |
|
Thanks I pulled from another a local dealers website. I must have screwed up the images. I got em from right click > view source, then weeded through the HTML. |
|
|
I didn;t know your choices were limited. Out of those get the 6 7/8" slabside.
Low weight but has a thumbrest and its pretty. Also has a better trigger than the others. |
|
Because it is a great pistola. Quite accurate. Fun to shoot. |
|
|
|
The other day my buddy and I joined a local gun club. I'm a long time MASS resident, but's he's a transplant from the south. Only here two years. The club president said, "Why the hell did you move here!? We're all trying to get out." |
|
|
Ruger MKIII6 22LR
Unless you can get the same gun in 4". The newer guns seem to have really bad triggers but that can be cured. I never liked the Ruger autos until my daughter shot one. It was the first auto pistol she ever shot. She lectured me all the way home that she never wanted to shoot a gun "you had to cock with your thumb" again. I bought a used 4" from a guy at work. Since then I shoot it more than anybody else and really enjoy it. I bought a used 6" one the other day and it is dead on. So is the 4" for that matter. Both are older first models. Around here short is good, light is good. A 6" gun is good on the range but no good in the field for a companion gun. YMMV |
|
It looks nice but I prefer blued because it has more of a subdued appearance. |
|
|
Yeah I bought my first one for my GF. I loved it so much I bought a few more. Steel plates + lots of mags + lots of ammo = |
|
|
Why...affordable...reliable. Dont get me wrong, Bill was a sellout...but... My personal why: When I was a kid, at Christmas, my grandpa would take me out to shoot missletoe out of trees for grandma to decorate the house with. We used his ruger .22 pistol and a walther .22 rifle....The rifle proved more capable, but I always loved shooting that pistol. -HS |
|
|
|
I went to purchase a Mark II 678, and ended up leaving with a Browning Buckmark. Just felt much more comfortable in my hand. Not sure if you are set on the Ruger expressly, but if not, you may want to look at one.
I've heard a lot of good about the Rugers, and almost nothing bad. About the only negative comment I hear is that reassembly is a bitch after tearing it down! ETA: I'm really eyeballing the MKIII512 for my next .22 pistol. I gotta admit, they are a good-looking pistol! |
|
Wondered how long this would take. Bill was a sellout but Colt wasn't? Funny, ALL milspec parts fit MY AR15, how about your Colt? |
||
|
They are not hard to field strip. You just have to know what you are doing. I will agree the grip is a little different. So hold one before you decide. |
|
|
I have a 41 too, both barrels, one with a red-dot. It seems I usually shoot one of the 2 Ruger slabsides I have more. Never seriously tested either with dozens of different brands of ammo to see which would group best. But with bulk-box ammo, the Rugers shoot just as good as the 41, for me. ymmv |
|
|
What they said, if you must buy Ruger. Does Taxxachusetts not allow Browning Buckmarks? I like my Ruger' (bought before I got edumacated on Bill's politics) , But love my Buckmark's. Mags for the Browning cost more, about $28 vs. about $18 for the Ruger MKII's. Don't know if the MkIII's use the same mag's or not. |
||
|
IMHO, Browning Buckmark Bullseye. You wont want ot shoot another ruger again.
CH |
|
Don't think so. I'll ask. This state SUCKS! My senior senator is an alcoholic drunk driving murderer and my junior senator is an effing kommie who gave mouth-to-mouth to a hampster. |
|||
|
+3 I had a MKII like it and got rid of it... I don't know why I loved the pistol. |
|||
|
KMKIII678H 22LR... Rugers are very good pistols.......You will be happy with your purchase.. WarDawg
|
|
"No honest person needs no more than a 10 round magazine" I wonder who said that just to get better sales for his mini-14. Dont get a Ruger.
|
|
I have a 22/45 with 4" bull barrel (round, not the "slab side"), target model with adjustable sights. It's perfect for all around use, suprisingly accurate even though it's a 4" barrel. MUST use CCI mini-mag ammo though, otherwise it will stovepipe every now and then. I've got 1000's of mini-mag rounds through it and never had a single misfeed, stovepipe, etc.
|
|
I can +1 the Ruger KMKIII678GC 22LR - sweet shooting, very accurate out of the box, but a bit heavy.
If you want to work one over you can get very, very good performance without spending too much. If I were to do that, I'd go with the 4 to 5 1/2 in. barrels. Length is really unecessary to obtain good accuracy with the right barrel and trigger combo... Try here for more info: Rimfire Central Whatever you do, don't look at the 10/22 pics! |
|
If I was to be in the market for a 22 pistol and I couldn't talk my brother out of his High Standard, and if I got a Ruger I'ld look at the ones that match up the 1911 handle geometry. I happen to like that over the more angled pistol handle geometry.
I would get the Ruger P45GCMKIII 22LR, preferrably a stainless version if they made it, but that's because I have access to a really nice High Standard if I wanted to do some serious targetting, if I wanted it for the equivalent of a kit gun to throw in my fishing bag or day pack or ?? this one has the less snaggy sights etc. |
|
Do they make any without the magazine disconnects? MkIII series?
|
|
MKII do not have it. You can still get them. |
|
|
I had a KMKII678H 22LR.
A couple of points about the rugers: Bitch to takedown and clean (not that .22 needs a huge amount of that). The holes for the grip screws are extremely easy to strip. They really should have been reinforced. It sure is one heavy pistol. I have a Sig Trailside (I got before they dropped the hammer) that I love, one of the few in MA. I've been considering awarding ruger a few dollars for coming up with an MA compliant version though. Might try that fluted version. BTW, you can get new S&W Model 41s now here legally too. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.