User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 2:18:11 PM EDT
[#1]
That's what they said about Reagan in 1980.
But guess what? They elected the Prophet from Palm Springs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 2:22:07 PM EDT
[#2]
When I say Hillary Clinton has no chance of winning, I'm saying it because she really has no chance in even getting her parties nominations.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 2:28:08 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When I say Hillary Clinton has no chance of winning, I'm saying it because she really has no chance in even getting her parties nominations. What about when someone says it about a candidate in their own party running for the primary election? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 2:29:49 PM EDT
[#4]
When people in the last few elections have pointed out that Ron Paul had "no chance of winning" they were 100 % correct
Just because some people say things out of wishful thinking, does not mean that other peoples' analysis is incorrect. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 2:31:45 PM EDT
[#5]
I always think of a MSM parroting mental midget when I hear that line.
It is their number one way of discrediting anyone not approved. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 2:48:33 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When people in the last few elections have pointed out that Ron Paul had "no chance of winning" they were 100 % correct Just because some people say things out of wishful thinking, does not mean that other peoples' analysis is incorrect. no, he was in the primarys, so he had a chance. Molotov357 has it right |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 2:55:43 PM EDT
[#7]
I say that about Donald Trump all the time...and yes secretly I would laugh if he won
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 2:56:40 PM EDT
[#8]
Usually followed by ".....he's a libertarian presidential candidate."
And they're always right. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 4:09:02 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When people in the last few elections have pointed out that Ron Paul had "no chance of winning" they were 100 % correct Just because some people say things out of wishful thinking, does not mean that other peoples' analysis is incorrect. How do you know that he did not lose because people were being told that he was going to lose. From the beginning he was a candidate that people took time out of their day specifically to discredit. Even the media jumped on this wagon. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qtDJ6Ay4QMw I am sure that John Stewart had an alternate agenda with what he was doing but the segment he put together still points out what I'm saying. I bring all of this up because there are candidates in this upcoming race that I'm starting to hear the same rhetoric about. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 4:15:14 PM EDT
[#10]
When you hear it early on, it seems like it is mostly wishful thinking. Basically just a way to discredit a candidate when you don't have any good reasons to do so.
Later on, it will usually be because they did/said something really fucking stupid. Mostly, though, it seems like it is really just the way that the MSM tries to tell you who you should/should not vote for.. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 4:26:30 PM EDT
[#11]
Mostly its people in the main stream media and consultants on cable talk shows saying that. They both have the same agenda - elect more marxists.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 4:41:56 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
no, he was in the primarys, so he had a chance. Molotov357 has it right Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
When people in the last few elections have pointed out that Ron Paul had "no chance of winning" they were 100 % correct Just because some people say things out of wishful thinking, does not mean that other peoples' analysis is incorrect. no, he was in the primarys, so he had a chance. Molotov357 has it right lol |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 4:43:08 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How do you know that he did not lose because people were being told that he was going to lose. From the beginning he was a candidate that people took time out of their day specifically to discredit. Even the media jumped on this wagon. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qtDJ6Ay4QMw I am sure that John Stewart had an alternate agenda with what he was doing but the segment he put together still points out what I'm saying. I bring all of this up because there are candidates in this upcoming race that I'm starting to hear the same rhetoric about. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
When people in the last few elections have pointed out that Ron Paul had "no chance of winning" they were 100 % correct Just because some people say things out of wishful thinking, does not mean that other peoples' analysis is incorrect. How do you know that he did not lose because people were being told that he was going to lose. From the beginning he was a candidate that people took time out of their day specifically to discredit. Even the media jumped on this wagon. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qtDJ6Ay4QMw I am sure that John Stewart had an alternate agenda with what he was doing but the segment he put together still points out what I'm saying. I bring all of this up because there are candidates in this upcoming race that I'm starting to hear the same rhetoric about. No offense, but if you do not understand how Ron Paul NEVER had the slightest chance of becoming President of the United States, I am not sure a serious conversation is even possible. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2015 4:49:52 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No offense, but if you do not understand how Ron Paul NEVER had the slightest chance of becoming President of the United States, I am not sure a serious conversation is even possible. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
When people in the last few elections have pointed out that Ron Paul had "no chance of winning" they were 100 % correct Just because some people say things out of wishful thinking, does not mean that other peoples' analysis is incorrect. How do you know that he did not lose because people were being told that he was going to lose. From the beginning he was a candidate that people took time out of their day specifically to discredit. Even the media jumped on this wagon. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qtDJ6Ay4QMw I am sure that John Stewart had an alternate agenda with what he was doing but the segment he put together still points out what I'm saying. I bring all of this up because there are candidates in this upcoming race that I'm starting to hear the same rhetoric about. No offense, but if you do not understand how Ron Paul NEVER had the slightest chance of becoming President of the United States, I am not sure a serious conversation is even possible. I think I understand what you're saying. Probably a lot bigger picture involved than the one I was pointing out. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
