Reading some of the information that is contained on this site has definately educated me, and has opened my eyes to quite a few things that I was not aware of earlier. However, there is one belief that I have that in my short period on this board I have not seen discussed.
If I recall correctly, one of the goals in the creation of the United States of America was to get away from having a monarchy, or in simpler terms, to get away from having a ruling class. What I am wondering is whether the framers of the constitution believed that individuals elected to public office would serve their terms, viewing it as a civil duty, then once their terms are up go back to what ever they were doing before.
Or, did the framers see that we were giving up one form of a ruling class to create another ruling class? Seeing how there are such individuals who make a career out of politics, it makes me wonder if this occurred to the fathers of our country that by not putting in some form of limits of how long an individual can serve, this would cause another ruling class to start up and be able to stay in power, even through family ties.
I personally believe that when the Constitution was written, it was believed that serving as a senator or representative would be a task to be undertaken, done to the best of one's ability, and then relinquished to allow someone else to try their hand.
I remember from a book by Arthur C. Clark that in time period the book took place, every elected office was filled via lottery, with criminals and mentally unstable individuals unable to serve. A good quote from the book was along the lines of "He who wishes to obtain public office should automatically be excluded from obtaining it."
Feel free to flame me as much as you want.