This "Duty to Society" business is a thinly veiled trap used by the Libs.
They use the purposely ill-defined but far-reaching concept of "Society" to enforce whatever cause celebre they are touting at the moment. Your refusal to acknowledge the primacy of Society over the individual is a hallmark of the free-thinking non-Liberal.
They will use that refusal to paint the refuser as a dangerous,[b]anti-social[/b], selfish individual.
First off, ask them to define [b]exactly[/b] what "Society" is.
Assuming they are able to put forth a coherent reply (it is up to you to force them to do so; they will be as vague as you let them be), then ask them why a duty is owed to society at all. This should have them choking on their words, as such a concept, to Libs is [b]unquestioned[/b], and therefore, usually poorly thought out on their part. You are just helping them to make fools of themselves.
The correct answer to such a question, of course, is that you have no "Duty to Society" at all.
All that's needed for a sane human to live in society with other sane humans is for the individual to renounce the first use of force.
So don't ever fall into the traps set by Libs. [b]Never[/b] let them define the rules of the discussion, and always make them define their terms and concepts exactly.
Do that a few times, and they will avoid you like the plague.