Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 6/27/2002 8:05:31 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/27/2002 8:06:48 AM EDT by wiggy762]
All I notice coming from the Liberals are stances meant to NOT STAND FOR ANYTHING!!! They seem to be more interested in making sure that nobody get their feelings hurt, that everyone 'gets along', that no one is ever offended. I must admit that IF we lived in a world that supported these types of individual bliss, this way of life would be the best way to live and raise a family......BUT WE DON"T LIVE IN THAT WORLD!!!! What will it take to wake these idiot Liberals up? Some jack-off in California does not want his child indoctrinated with "God" so he sues the Pledge of Allegiance! FROM THE MAJORITY OPINION JUDICIAL CONSERVATIVE DISTRICT 1 You have brought a suit against a cornerstone of this country when you disagreed with the wording of the Pledge of Allegiance. We, The Court, find that this suit has merit and in an effort protect Mr. Jack Mehoff's childs rights granted under the First Ammendment, we order; Mr. Jack Mehoff and entire family be deported from the shores of our great country, to a 'socialist paradise' of their choosing. Mr. Mehoff and family forfeit all rights and priviledges linked to any property, real or conceptual, located within the borders of our great Nation. Mr. Mehoff and family are hereby enjoined from ever returning to desecrate the soil of America, in life or death. And Finally, The Pledge of Allegiance will be kept as is, verbatim, as our great Nation was founded in response to religious intolerance. In light of this, we The Court, strive to continue to protect the rights of the disenfranchised. But, as in this case, we also have a responsibility to uphold and protect the tenets on which this country was established. Our citizens may like it or not, but our country was founded not as a religious state, but rather as a nation that our Founding Fathers realized many of the basic constructs of Protestant Christian religion were the proper framework on which to build a country. "IF YOU DON"T LOVE IT, LEAVE IT" Walkin' On the Fightin' Side of Me Merle Haggard, 1968
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 8:55:26 AM EDT
Their emotions....How they feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel.
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 8:57:25 AM EDT
It changes day to day. Keving67
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 9:05:06 AM EDT
I don't aggree with most Liberal principals, but it's the Wacko Liberals that piss me off. Your standard, everyday Liberal wants to check a poll before they spout their BS. The Wacko Liberal just feels the goverment should be bigger and be able to take care of all our needs (whether you need it or not). These folks have nothing to believe in but the goverment, Not God, Not Family, and Not Themselves. They want to be taken care of by the goverment at all our expenses.
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 9:10:28 AM EDT
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 9:10:41 AM EDT
I've always thought they stood for butt-plugging your disarmmed buddy. Have I missed something here?
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 9:16:01 AM EDT
These people are truely EVIL. They are misplaced SOCIALISTS that want nothing more than to enslave you both physically and economically. They use causes that sound good on the outside to draw unsuspecting support from ignorant people. Let's face it envirnoment, safety, and animal rights all sound good, but when implemented in the socialist manner often used by liberals, these policies do nothing for the cause and only stifel your abitity to prosper. Which is their only objective.
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 10:30:20 AM EDT
What DO the libs stand for...hmmmmm, that is a good question. For the unitiated...the following sites might be informative: [url]http://www.dsausa.org/dsa.html[/url] ...and then there's this enlightening little site... [url]http://bernie.house.gov/pc/[/url]. [puke] Now...for those of you non-political junkies like me who lives within a good holler of the Beltway, pay very close attention to what these people have to say. Actually, they are nothing more than unrepentant communists...but they can't take the heat of simply declaring themselves to be Commies since the term is still rather perjoritive among most Americans. The folks back home in Peoria might not like having a "commie pinko" as their representative or senator. Instead, they refer to themselves as "progressives"...and most folks out in fly-over country hear that and say, "Well shoot...who ain't for being progressive?" Little do they know. So...to interpret this crap...read thru the Democratic Progressive Caucus...and study what they stand for...then compare that to what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say on their site...then just listen to Daschle and Gephardt and their cronies on the tube every night, and you'll get an idea of where the liberals are coming from. For those of us old enough to have grown up during the Cold War and remembering the old Commie Doctrine...their crap is straight out of Marxist-Leninism. Y'all might also be interested to know that the American socialists are part of an international group...just like the old commies were. Only thing is...these guys operate within our own government. Ever wonder why the Dems are always talking up internationalism and the UN...and talking down nationalism, capitalism, patriotism and the military? Also, remember that these are OUR representatives and senators who are aligning themselves with the Democratic Socialist Party. Scary ain't it. Now...to close: Anyone want to hazard a guess who was just this week declared to be the MOST LIBERAL senator of all 100...based on HER voting record? Yup...Senator Hillary! That's the one. So, in a few years when you go to the polls to vote Democratic ticket for President and you see Her Nibs name on the ballot...maybe you'll think twice before pulling the lever for her. I really hope this helps. [;D]
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 10:50:29 AM EDT
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 11:49:45 AM EDT
Originally Posted By thebeekeeper1: LWilde, everything you said is spot on, so why the "smartass" smiley? Just curious.
View Quote
Bee... Thanks. I do make a meager attempt to keep to the truth. The smiley was actually aimed at the heart of the libs who are smokin' their keyboards right now coming after me, especially about the bit on Hillary. Guess I could have used another icon...didn't mean to give anyone the idea I wasn't serious. Just being sarcastic. Truth is, this is really scary. Those fifty or so members of our congress that are members of the Progressive Caucus are really F$&#^ING Commies in disguise! They spout stuff right out of Das Capital and out of the Commie doctrine from the fifties and sixties. They play at Communism-Lite but their underpinnings are true to Lenin's philosophy. Problem is...so few of us really understand what we are seeing. Cheers, "The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion."...Edmund Burke
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 11:57:03 AM EDT
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 12:05:35 PM EDT
I always figured they stand for more power and privlege for themselves, no matter what it costs YOU.
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 12:08:17 PM EDT
It appears to me liberals depend more on their intellectual fortitude instead of facts. Some of their ideas and ideology is pure fallacy and is unacheivable in the real world. They have a utopian vision that frustrates them to no end. Their anger is displaced and lands squarely on Conservatives. The only time liberals wake up is when they collide with reality and lose. Shok
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 12:23:42 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/27/2002 12:25:34 PM EDT by thebeekeeper1]
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 12:37:25 PM EDT
I think what liberals THINK they stand for is complete Equality. In reality this translates to dragging 99% of the population down to the level of the lowest common denominator with an elite 1% that makes decesions for everyone and try keeps things "fair" by persecuting achievers and those that don't go along with the program.
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 1:13:19 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/27/2002 1:13:41 PM EDT by mattja]
[size=4]LIES[/size=4] For instance, the demos have been ranting about how Bush's tax cut "cost too much." Cost too much? For a normal person, when they think "cost" the first thing that comes to mind are the administrative costs associated with processing the tax cut. To the demos, "cost too much" means the loss of tax revenue. In effect, to the demos, it "cost too much" to return to me my own money. FVCK THE DEMS!
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 3:14:06 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/27/2002 3:19:05 PM EDT by More_Cowbell]
This is what they stand for, as I see it: -People before profit/distrust and strict regulation of corporate entities -Fair trade, not free trade -racial equality/harmony -economic equality through decent living wages, unions, and a steeply progressive income tax -preservation of the environment -universal health care, public education -tolerance and celebration of diversity -abortion rights and gender equality -sensible gun laws That seems to sum up their views and how they'd like to see the world run.
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 4:08:54 PM EDT
Originally Posted By More_Cowbell: This is what they stand for, as I see it:
View Quote
Which, in reality goes something like this:
-People before profit/distrust...
View Quote
Translated: Money to demorat special interests groups as opposed to money to meaningful, effective causes.
and strict regulation of corporate entities
View Quote
Translated: Absolute control of commerce.
-Fair trade, not free trade
View Quote
Translated: Trade with PC nations, tariffs and subsidies to prop-up failing industries.
-racial equality/harmony
View Quote
Translated: Quotas, affirmative action, hate crime legislation applied only to Whites, welfare, spread the wealth, etc.
-economic equality through decent living wages, unions, and a steeply progressive income tax
View Quote
Translated: Forced equality through socialism. Force those who produce to support those who do not. Tax those who produce more than those who do not.
-preservation of the environment
View Quote
Translated: Throw money at environwhacko groups so they can spike trees. Create a system of habitat preservation that resulted in the devastating fires we recently saw in Arizona and Colorado.
-universal health care, public education
View Quote
Translated: Free health care for illegal aliens, indoctrination into socialism.
-tolerance and celebration of diversity
View Quote
Translated: Special privileges for certain racial groups.
-abortion rights and gender equality
View Quote
Translated: Murder of 3rd trimester infants, introduction and then promotion of women into fields they are incapable of competing physically. Ever wonder why UPS and FedEx lowered the maximum weight of packages they will ship? End result is added cost for both business and consumers.
-sensible gun laws
View Quote
Ha! Don't even get me started on this one.
That seems to sum up their views and how they'd like to see the world run.
View Quote
Yeah, like a combination of Bosnia/Russia/China with an elite class running the show.
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 5:25:59 PM EDT
Originally Posted By More_Cowbell: This is what they stand for, as I see it: -People before profit/distrust and strict regulation of corporate entities -Fair trade, not free trade -racial equality/harmony -economic equality through decent living wages, unions, and a steeply progressive income tax -preservation of the environment -universal health care, public education -tolerance and celebration of diversity -abortion rights and gender equality -sensible gun laws That seems to sum up their views and how they'd like to see the world run.
View Quote
Cowbell, [b]THANK YOU...THANK YOU...THANK YOU![/b][^] You JUST made my argument for me! You posted virtually EVER ONE of the euphemistic catch-phrases of the liberal/socialists amongst us! Those are the "code word" phrases that define how liberals would take over our society and impose total control on all of us. mattja...you too are to be commended for your inciteful analysis of Cowbell's input. Succinctly and accurately done. Well done! [beer]
Top Top