User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:50:45 PM EDT
[#1]
Vague thread is vague.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:50:45 PM EDT
[#2]
I'm going with Russia.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:52:12 PM EDT
[#3]
I'm going with Afghanistan, how could you even tell the difference.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:52:58 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm going with Afghanistan, how could you even tell the difference. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:52:59 PM EDT
[#5]
Seems it really depends upon where they hit.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:53:50 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Came here to post this! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I'm going with Afghanistan, how could you even tell the difference. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:53:54 PM EDT
[#7]
Our time on this planet is almost up.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:54:27 PM EDT
[#8]
Nominate a "last country standing" candidate for a poll.
Churning dirt doesn't count. 1st or 2nd world nominees. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:57:26 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm going with Russia. I'll disagree with that one. Country is huge but essential services and population are really concentrated. Those first couple nukes will take out a lot of important stuff that can't be compensated for by the open spaces. I'd say the US or China. Big in terms of area and numerous separate population centers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:57:30 PM EDT
[#10]
Pick any random sub-Saharan African country, nuke the living hell out of it, and in 5 years it would look exactly the same as before you started.
As far as 1st world countries, the US could probably absorb the most nukes before collapsing into a Mad Max situation. There is still a lot of cold war era redundancy built into our communications, banking, and electric grid that most people are unaware exists. We could literally lose several major cities and carry on close to business as usual after the panic and dust subsided. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 1:58:29 PM EDT
[#11]
USA. Resilient motherfucker
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:00:45 PM EDT
[#12]
China, they are still the closest to having lived in stone age conditions.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:01:46 PM EDT
[#13]
In terms of nuclear powers Russia has the most empty space to nuke but they also have their population fairly grouped together in the western part of the country so I guess it depends on how the nukes are targeted
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:02:51 PM EDT
[#14]
Russia .
China . gd |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:04:13 PM EDT
[#15]
Where is the biggest assless chaps factory located?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:05:14 PM EDT
[#16]
Probably India or China.
The United States would collapse pretty quickly from social unrest if a couple cities were hit. (People would flee the cities in droves going… where? Then our own people burn our partially deserted cities down. Government checks stop coming, drug addicts can’t get their fix at the pharmacy. People can’t get medicine. The whole country would collapse in short order.) |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:06:43 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
USA. Resilient motherfucker |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:07:16 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm going with Russia. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:08:05 PM EDT
[#19]
North Korea
they are super hard to destroy i think we need to use ten times more nukes than we think we need to destroy them........... just to be sure you know |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:08:52 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Probably India or China. The United States would collapse pretty quickly from social unrest if a couple cities were hit. (People would flee the cities in droves going… where? Then our own people burn our partially deserted cities down. Government checks stop coming, drug addicts can’t get their fix at the pharmacy. People can’t get medicine. The whole country would collapse in short order.) If the US got merely the equivalent of 1945 era tech bombs like "Little Boy"/Hiroshima on NYC and "Fat Man"/Nagasaki on Los Angeles? The US social cohesion level right now barely registers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:10:20 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
China, they are still the closest to having lived in stone age conditions. Look up what ACC is and how the Chinese are pushing it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:23:01 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Never been there, have you? Look up what ACC is and how the Chinese are pushing it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
China, they are still the closest to having lived in stone age conditions. Look up what ACC is and how the Chinese are pushing it. Taiwan is more developed than mainland China and in Taiwan, there are areas far more modern that anyplace else I've ever seen, and there are areas that are very backward and remind me of how one would have lived about the time when the first tendrils of electricity came to the USA. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:34:15 PM EDT
[#23]
Depends on where they land. You could probably collapse the US with 6 nukes in the right places. For sure with a dozen.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:41:07 PM EDT
[#24]
Generally those are targeted at population centers. Places like Chicago or New York or Los Angeles.
Absorbing a few nuclear detonations might actually improve the United States of America. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:47:14 PM EDT
[#25]
Dunno. How many do you have?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:51:37 PM EDT
[#26]
I nominate Iran, since those sneaky, slit tongued fucks have been trying to mess with us since the revolution. I would love to see Tehran glassed over.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 2:51:57 PM EDT
[#27]
Before economic collapse?
Well considering they have literally no resources aside from coal, concrete, and meth, and not much going on in inhabited population hub, I'd say North Korea could probably hold out better than any given modernized country. They're already at zero. When you the Choson Rodongdang and new sanctions get thrown down 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 3:23:36 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm going with Russia. 48hrs w/o power here amd people were starting to crack during the last hurricane. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 3:25:17 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm going with Afghanistan, how could you even tell the difference. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 3:27:16 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm going with Afghanistan, how could you even tell the difference. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 3:27:52 PM EDT
[#31]
Not sure who would win this contest, but Japan is in the lead, 2-0.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 3:31:23 PM EDT
[#32]
ETA - waaaay too slow. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 3:48:23 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
ETA - waaaay too slow.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 3:48:32 PM EDT
[#34]
Someone with the least to lose. Either Afghanistan or Somalia.
I love the US of A, but people here lose their shit when a cell tower goes down. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 4:24:24 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If only you had read instead of posting. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
ETA - waaaay too slow.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 4:33:00 PM EDT
[#36]
I'm going with China
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 4:38:22 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Generally those are targeted at population centers. Places like Chicago or New York or Los Angeles. Absorbing a few nuclear detonations might actually improve the United States of America. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 4:40:52 PM EDT
[#38]
Maybe you could narrow it down. Who would last longer hypothetically...
U.S.A. with Washigton D.C. nuked Russia with Moscow nuked or China with Beijing nuked? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 4:47:39 PM EDT
[#39]
Greenland is effectively immune.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 4:51:15 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Maybe you could narrow it down. Who would last longer hypothetically... U.S.A. with Washigton D.C. nuked Russia with Moscow nuked or China with Beijing nuked? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 4:55:19 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm going with Russia. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 5:09:59 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There are still amazingly rural areas in both Russia and China where it would be awhile before anything short of being blown up or irradiated would matter too much. There was a documentary here in Russian about some russian town out in the wilderness, it seemed like living in Alaska in the early 20th century. China has enough internal tensions that it would, IMHO, go all 1920's warlord era if Beijing was taken out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 5:11:56 PM EDT
[#43]
Afghanistan.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 5:12:42 PM EDT
[#44]
87% of Americans would surrender if they lost their cell phone service.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 5:19:04 PM EDT
[#45]
Norks....they will out live cockroaches. They can live in a cave forever without food.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 5:20:20 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm going with Afghanistan, how could you even tell the difference. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 5:27:08 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
USA. Resilient motherfucker |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 5:40:38 PM EDT
[#48]
Greenland
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 5:47:59 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Depends on where they land. You could probably collapse the US with 6 nukes in the right places. For sure with a dozen. No way. We have over 20 cities with one million+ populations, and over 50 with 500,000 plus. Our population is much more evenly distributed compared to a lot of countries like Russia or China. Also, one aspect of centrally planned economies (China and Russia again) is that they like to build one giant factory or focal point for all of the shit they do, i.e., for a long time in the USSR there was only one (one!) fucking ginormous factory that made batteries... In America, we have a lot of smaller factories and control centers for stuff like communications and production. Also, we have more miles of paved roads than anywhere else in the world, so it would be relatively easy to start from scratch in an unscathed area, say, Bumfuck, Nebraska that is right next to I-80. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2017 5:51:56 PM EDT
[#50]
The US has bombed the US a lot.
So I'm gonna go with the US. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
