Quoted:
Quoted: The news account I read said that it was deposited in a cone-shaped formation, roughly 600 feet high.
Screw another mission to the moon - We should be blazing new paths, rather than revisiting old ones.
On to Mars, damnit!
|
IIRC the new mission to the moon will be like a practice to mars...testing new technologies and strategies...much easier to troubleshoot on the moon than mars.
|
You cant go to Mars in one shot from the surface of the Earth. Any ships that can do the round trip hauling materials and people for a perminant stay on Mars will be too big to be sent up in one piece. You need a space dockyard, a gate way. And the only place to do that is in Lunar orbit.
But once you have gone that far then it just makes better sense to get as much material as you can from the low gravity Moon- which also doesn't have a atmosphere to incinerate you if you goof up- rather than haul it from the deeper gravity well.
A return to the Moon is in order to acquire Lunar resources, especially Oxygen and the aluminum, titanium and steel needed for spaceship hulls- by far the greatest chunk of mass. Things like computers, wireing, probably even the engines will still get hauled up from Earth but we are still saving a huge amout of mass.
Developing the small, largely unmanned ore extraction and metal refining equipment and then the foundries and machineing units to make things like rolled metal or metal tubing to make hulls from is going to be interesting as well...