if there was evidence tampering then the defense would challenge it and the court would of thrown it.
exactly what evidence was thrown out?
yes fuhrman and vanatter made mistakes in handling evidence, but i dont believe there was any tampering.
these are seasoned homicide cops who have done this before many times, and they know that this case was going to be HUGE from the beginning and being that a celeb is involved they are not going to risk there careers by tampering evidence. they treated OJ better and gave more discretion to him than any other murder suspect.
they find his blood at the crime, shoe prints matching his shoes, bloody socks and gloves with the victims blood on it. all they had to do was bag it and tag it, how do you tamper this ?
make simple mistakes in processing? sure, but they arent dumb enough to try and frame a celeb.
many people blame the prosecution team, even vanatter, he claims they didnt use all the solid evidence.
others blame the idiot judge who should be removed for allowing a circus to happen in his court room.
but mostly OJ just hired the biggest attorneys in the biz who could confuse the jury, play the race card and put on an illusion of innocence.
but consider the jury, who had spent about a year away from its family being sequestered, who probably walked into the court day 1 not wanting to convict OJ, and fearing another LA riots should there be a conviction.
when the verdicts were read, one of the black jurors stood up and gave the black panther salute.
fair and impartial jury ? I THINK NOT