User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:24:30 AM EDT
[#1]
In.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:26:22 AM EDT
[#2]
Is it happening yet?
TC |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:27:15 AM EDT
[#3]
That guy is all over the place.
He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:28:12 AM EDT
[#4]
Is honeypot code for somethings?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:30:50 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That guy is all over the place. He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. Exactly this. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:33:01 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is honeypot code for somethings? Not really. A trap like an unsecured or poorly secured server owned by a hostile host is generally referred to as a honeypot. The hosts aren't always hostile though. Sometimes the honeypot is just a decoy. They are sometimes used to catch intruders, which are then blocked before they can cause harm to the real systems. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:33:08 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is honeypot code for somethings? Fake or cloned system to lure hackers in. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:33:38 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That guy is all over the place. He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. agreed, after the first 12-24 hours when they hacked Podesta they went completely off the rails |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:33:44 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is honeypot code for somethings? In computer terminology, a honeypot is a computer security mechanism set to detect, deflect, or, in some manner, counteract attempts at unauthorized use of information systems. Generally, a honeypot consists of data (for example, in a network site) that appears to be a legitimate part of the site but is actually isolated and monitored, and that seems to contain information or a resource of value to attackers, which are then blocked. This is similar to the police baiting a criminal and then conducting undercover surveillance, and finally punishing the criminal.[1] |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:35:35 AM EDT
[#10]
If it was compromised we would be seeing the insurance file keys being released by now. They have multiple places, users, etc that they would all be released by if this event were to occur, no single point of failure its an entire network that would be impossible to completely shut down.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:36:39 AM EDT
[#11]
In.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:36:45 AM EDT
[#12]
Is anyone surprised? I'm surprised it didn't happen a lot sooner.
I guess the Left was surprised their favorite leaker turned on them and have been trying to rein him in; now they just want to shut him down. He's becoming persona non grata at the embassy ever since he started leaking all over FHRC. The Ecuadorian prez, an America hating douchebag, is very unhappy and may give Assange his walking papers soon. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:37:25 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is it happening yet? TC Yes, it is: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1921539_.html |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:45:21 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
agreed, after the first 12-24 hours when they hacked Podesta they went completely off the rails Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That guy is all over the place. He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. agreed, after the first 12-24 hours when they hacked Podesta they went completely off the rails Yep, SNR is shit on that one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:50:53 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. The current belief is because Assange has not been seen since Pam Anderson left, which was followed by a bunch of police going in, Kerry getting involved, and the CIA shutting down his internet. 0HOUR__ does seem to freak out a lot but he is right that Wikileaks is posting way too much compared to before. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:54:32 AM EDT
[#16]
0HOUR1 is at least 90% bullshit.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 8:59:51 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The current belief is because Assange has not been seen since Pam Anderson left, which was followed by a bunch of police going in, Kerry getting involved, and the CIA shutting down his internet. 0HOUR__ does seem to freak out a lot but he is right that Wikileaks is posting way too much compared to before. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. The current belief is because Assange has not been seen since Pam Anderson left, which was followed by a bunch of police going in, Kerry getting involved, and the CIA shutting down his internet. 0HOUR__ does seem to freak out a lot but he is right that Wikileaks is posting way too much compared to before. And they aren't typical tweetseez like they have in the past |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:02:59 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That guy is all over the place. He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. So an ARFCOMMER? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:08:17 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That guy is all over the place. He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. I think the account is just monitoring 4/8chan and posting whatever speculation and info that comes up there. Some of it just happens to be correct. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:21:43 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think the account is just monitoring 4/8chan and posting whatever speculation and info that comes up there. Some of it just happens to be correct. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That guy is all over the place. He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. I think the account is just monitoring 4/8chan and posting whatever speculation and info that comes up there. Some of it just happens to be correct. Another post said they monitor IRC. It's been years since I have been on that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:37:36 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
0HOUR1 is at least 90% bullshit. And the other 10% shows no real connection to Anonymous, it could've been sourced from chatrooms or media reports. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:47:49 AM EDT
[#22]
The tone of wikileaks' tweets changed greatly yesterday, I could easily believe the account was taken
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:52:19 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The tone of wikileaks' tweets changed greatly yesterday, I could easily believe the account was taken  |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:58:07 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
0HOUR1 is at least 90% bullshit. I have heard a theory that he/it is a group account that several people use to post. Misdirection with a bit of truth tossed in. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:18:39 AM EDT
[#25]
This stuff has literally rewritten the definition and scope of organized crime.
The Republic is truly dying. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:20:26 AM EDT
[#26]
All wikileak's recent posts seem to still be hammering hillary so I'm not sure what could have changed.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:22:06 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yep, SNR is shit on that one. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That guy is all over the place. He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. agreed, after the first 12-24 hours when they hacked Podesta they went completely off the rails Yep, SNR is shit on that one. At least 2 distinct personalities based on post style and content. The "B" team gives me a headache. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:25:47 AM EDT
[#28]
IN_1
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:26:21 AM EDT
[#29]
Maybe w/Assange being cut off the control of the wikileaks account was handed off to others, and those others are more politically motivated.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:27:30 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Maybe w/Assange being cut off the control of the wikileaks account was handed off to others, and those others are more politically motivated. very possible, it's also possible one of those others was an infiltrator |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:27:37 AM EDT
[#31]
In.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:30:57 AM EDT
[#32]
Recent tweet from Anon that wiki is on autopilot with an Anon running the handle.
If Assange has a deadman somewhere in his PACE plan, I wonder how close we're getting to that. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:32:15 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
very possible, it's also possible one of those others was an infiltrator Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Maybe w/Assange being cut off the control of the wikileaks account was handed off to others, and those others are more politically motivated. very possible, it's also possible one of those others was an infiltrator BTW...has anyone actually seen Assange since they cut his internet? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:32:20 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Recent tweet from Anon that wiki is on autopilot with an Anon running the handle. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile whoever is running it should stfu, the banter is a bad look |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:33:42 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
whoever is running it should stfu, the banter is a bad look Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Recent tweet from Anon that wiki is on autopilot with an Anon running the handle. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile whoever is running it should stfu, the banter is a bad look Agreed. The canary in the cage didn't die - it just developed a case of brain damage. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:36:11 AM EDT
[#36]
Autopilot can just mean that if his internet is cut others can continue releasing the data. I would say that is what happened which is why the number and quality of tweets has changed. That doesn't answer the question of is Assange still around though.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 11:08:56 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Autopilot can just mean that if his internet is cut others can continue releasing the data. I would say that is what happened which is why the number and quality of tweets has changed. That doesn't answer the question of is Assange still around though. The degraded signal quality and various unusual happenings make me wonder if he got offered an historic carrot vs stick deal. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 11:22:28 AM EDT
[#38]
Tag...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 11:22:51 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
At least 2 distinct personalities based on post style and content. The "B" team gives me a headache. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That guy is all over the place. He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. agreed, after the first 12-24 hours when they hacked Podesta they went completely off the rails Yep, SNR is shit on that one. At least 2 distinct personalities based on post style and content. The "B" team gives me a headache. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile This. That said WIkileaks will be getting scrutiny from me, we do not know if they're compromised. If wikileaks says it AND I see it on an Okeefe video? Then I'll believe it.. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 11:51:13 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This. That said WIkileaks will be getting scrutiny from me, we do not know if they're compromised. If wikileaks says it AND I see it on an Okeefe video? Then I'll believe it.. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
At least 2 distinct personalities based on post style and content. The "B" team gives me a headache. This. That said WIkileaks will be getting scrutiny from me, we do not know if they're compromised. If wikileaks says it AND I see it on an Okeefe video? Then I'll believe it.. Wikileaks has a more subtle change. Some tweets appear legit. Others feel suspiciously /pol and have a more personal tone. Makes me suspect loss of positive control by higher-ups. That would fit with the "regularly scheduled program" type tweets from one authorized compartment about email leaks & geopolitical events. Then another compartment authorized to act autonomously in the absence of control fires up the "it's happening!" and "@somerandomhandle are you reading these?" Alternatively, some Anon just wants to watch the world burn. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 12:03:39 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wikileaks has a more subtle change. Some tweets appear legit. Others feel suspiciously /pol and have a more personal tone. Makes me suspect loss of positive control by higher-ups. That would fit with the "regularly scheduled program" type tweets from one authorized compartment about email leaks & geopolitical events. Then another compartment authorized to act autonomously in the absence of control fires up the "it's happening!" and "@somerandomhandle are you reading these?" Alternatively, some Anon just wants to watch the world burn. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
At least 2 distinct personalities based on post style and content. The "B" team gives me a headache. This. That said WIkileaks will be getting scrutiny from me, we do not know if they're compromised. If wikileaks says it AND I see it on an Okeefe video? Then I'll believe it.. Wikileaks has a more subtle change. Some tweets appear legit. Others feel suspiciously /pol and have a more personal tone. Makes me suspect loss of positive control by higher-ups. That would fit with the "regularly scheduled program" type tweets from one authorized compartment about email leaks & geopolitical events. Then another compartment authorized to act autonomously in the absence of control fires up the "it's happening!" and "@somerandomhandle are you reading these?" Alternatively, some Anon just wants to watch the world burn. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Also, when #14 dropped, there were 2 separate tweets from the account about it, within minutes of eachother. I think there's a few people on that handle, and they are not coordinating. That said, with the websites going down this morning, I wonder if this is their plan. When the 'uge leaks happen, they are going to cut the internet - blame the russians, now we have to turn on the TV to see Obammy blame Russia and hear about Trumptapes They will bury OKeefe's stuff People vote trump, he wins "Clearly it was hacked, cause look at the polls." |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 12:11:19 PM EDT
[#42]
in
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 12:14:40 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Also, when #14 dropped, there were 2 separate tweets from the account about it, within minutes of eachother. I think there's a few people on that handle, and they are not coordinating. That said, with the websites going down this morning, I wonder if this is their plan. When the 'uge leaks happen, they are going to cut the internet - blame the russians, now we have to turn on the TV to see Obammy blame Russia and hear about Trumptapes They will bury OKeefe's stuff People vote trump, he wins "Clearly it was hacked, cause look at the polls." Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
At least 2 distinct personalities based on post style and content. The "B" team gives me a headache. This. That said WIkileaks will be getting scrutiny from me, we do not know if they're compromised. If wikileaks says it AND I see it on an Okeefe video? Then I'll believe it.. Wikileaks has a more subtle change. Some tweets appear legit. Others feel suspiciously /pol and have a more personal tone. Makes me suspect loss of positive control by higher-ups. That would fit with the "regularly scheduled program" type tweets from one authorized compartment about email leaks & geopolitical events. Then another compartment authorized to act autonomously in the absence of control fires up the "it's happening!" and "@somerandomhandle are you reading these?" Alternatively, some Anon just wants to watch the world burn. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Also, when #14 dropped, there were 2 separate tweets from the account about it, within minutes of eachother. I think there's a few people on that handle, and they are not coordinating. That said, with the websites going down this morning, I wonder if this is their plan. When the 'uge leaks happen, they are going to cut the internet - blame the russians, now we have to turn on the TV to see Obammy blame Russia and hear about Trumptapes They will bury OKeefe's stuff People vote trump, he wins "Clearly it was hacked, cause look at the polls." Copy paste job from the other thread huh? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 12:24:40 PM EDT
[#44]
0Hour is either some kid in his mom's basement posting crap he reads on 4chan, or a paid (by either a political group...or a state) disinformation troll.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 12:25:52 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This. That said WIkileaks will be getting scrutiny from me, we do not know if they're compromised. If wikileaks says it AND I see it on an Okeefe video? Then I'll believe it.. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That guy is all over the place. He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. agreed, after the first 12-24 hours when they hacked Podesta they went completely off the rails Yep, SNR is shit on that one. At least 2 distinct personalities based on post style and content. The "B" team gives me a headache. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile This. That said WIkileaks will be getting scrutiny from me, we do not know if they're compromised. If wikileaks says it AND I see it on an Okeefe video? Then I'll believe it.. The Twitter handle appears to be th bush league. The website itself appears to be on an automated job and is less likely compromised. The Anon running Twitter needs to STFU. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 12:27:55 PM EDT
[#46]
Doubt it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 12:30:40 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Exactly this. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That guy is all over the place. He has some hits but a lot of it is his imagination running around. I follow him too. I wouldn't cite him for anything. I picture a 17 year old kid in the basement thinking up scenarios. Exactly this. Yes. 0HOUR1 is attention whoring garbage. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 12:31:00 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The tone of wikileaks' tweets changed greatly yesterday, I could easily believe the account was taken Yep, it went from fairly carefully worded statements to tinfoil declarations. Whoever was posting was not the usual author. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:20:09 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Copy paste job from the other thread huh? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
At least 2 distinct personalities based on post style and content. The "B" team gives me a headache. This. That said WIkileaks will be getting scrutiny from me, we do not know if they're compromised. If wikileaks says it AND I see it on an Okeefe video? Then I'll believe it.. Wikileaks has a more subtle change. Some tweets appear legit. Others feel suspiciously /pol and have a more personal tone. Makes me suspect loss of positive control by higher-ups. That would fit with the "regularly scheduled program" type tweets from one authorized compartment about email leaks & geopolitical events. Then another compartment authorized to act autonomously in the absence of control fires up the "it's happening!" and "@somerandomhandle are you reading these?" Alternatively, some Anon just wants to watch the world burn. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Also, when #14 dropped, there were 2 separate tweets from the account about it, within minutes of eachother. I think there's a few people on that handle, and they are not coordinating. That said, with the websites going down this morning, I wonder if this is their plan. When the 'uge leaks happen, they are going to cut the internet - blame the russians, now we have to turn on the TV to see Obammy blame Russia and hear about Trumptapes They will bury OKeefe's stuff People vote trump, he wins "Clearly it was hacked, cause look at the polls." Copy paste job from the other thread huh? Copy pasta baby 
I'm pretty tired |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:25:05 PM EDT
[#50]
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1921632_Rumors_of_Assange_being_dead__xposted_from__pol_.html
WikiLeaks does appear to be run by "trusted bodies" versus the official staff that appeared to be running it before. Tweets have changed tone a lot . |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
