User Panel
Posted: 10/26/2002 10:38:47 AM EDT
Here is a translation of a portion of
russian article that described conversation of correspondent with one of the special forces (spetsnaz) "alpha" guys who stormed the building (this you are not going to find in western media : ) At about three am, the spetsnaz "leaked" that the storm was about to begin. Nothing happened at that time, so the chechens relaxed. At about 5 am, the sleeping gas was let in into the ventilation system. After the gas has had effect, first and foremost, alpha fighters destroyed the female chechens with suicide bomber belts. "Our fighters just walked into the theater and just shot at close range sleeping terorrists. In the head." However, some hostages panicked and run out into the lobby, where they were shot by the chechens in the corridors and lobby. In the building they found 2000 kg of explosives, with majority placed under support pillars, some placed in passageways and on suicide belts. More than 750 hostages were freed, about 90 died. Fifty terrorists were killed: 32 men, and 18 women. Three terrorists captured, and a few escaped. I love the whole "shot in the head at close range while they were sleeping" part! Fantastic way to deal with $hitbag terrorist if you ask me! |
|
i had already figured thats what they did after
the sleeping gas. my wife and i were discussing that senario last night. good for them but how the hell did some escape????????????????? |
|
Quoted: After the gas has had effect, first and foremost, alpha fighters destroyed the female chechens with suicide bomber belts View Quote where in the US are you gonna find 18 year old boys willing to do this kind of work? to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. |
|
Cohiba, the enemy is disposable in a most prejudicial way. I'm overjoyed that this was carried out like this. No future bomber bitches.
|
|
To deal w/ T's, you just gotta take care of business plain and simple. NO F&%KING around when it comes to anyone with a bomb strapped to them in your vicinity!
You must take out the Bomber Bitches first. You wouldn't want any of them waking up and "pushing the button!" |
|
Hmmm, makes you wonder about the idea of giving those with the weakest constitution the devices that provide the most deterrent. Smaller body mass, they are gonna sleep the quickest. In the future, I don't think they will make the same mistake. Remember, every encounter is a learning experience for BOTH sides.
WWoodworth |
|
Quoted: to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote Hey Pussy, Bone up on American history. We have a great tradition of killing in the most brutal and inhumane ways. Our society survives. Based on you asinine statement, what is the alternative? |
|
Quoted: Quoted: After the gas has had effect, first and foremost, alpha fighters destroyed the female chechens with suicide bomber belts View Quote where in the US are you gonna find 18 year old boys willing to do this kind of work? to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote I guess you must have missed our use of nuclear weapons, and the carpet/fire bombing of German and Japanese cities. We murdered hundreds of thousands of enemy civilians indiscriminately because it was the single quickest way to end the war (no people to work in factories to make weapons, no population base to put in uniform with a rifle). |
|
Those assholes deserved no less. I'm really glad that Russia didn't capitulate; if they had you'd be seeing a wholesale escalation in the magnitude of these kinds of hostage situations. And they'd be popping up all over the place. 700 hostages surrounded by an assload of terrorists with bombs strapped to themselves is an incredibly daunting thing... I think Putin handled it as well as he possibly could.
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: After the gas has had effect, first and foremost, alpha fighters destroyed the female chechens with suicide bomber belts View Quote where in the US are you gonna find 18 year old boys willing to do this kind of work? to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote It would've tickled the shit out of me to do this when I first joined at 17 and I'd still get a chuckle out of it at 31. |
|
I heard a Russian Offical use a word I had not heard come out of the Russians mouths in a long time last night....He was refering to Chechnia
The word was LIQIUDATE. If I lived in the city of Grosney or there abouts...I think I would be looking for a place to hide. ...Because hells coming to breakfast. One must remember that the motto of the Russian Army has always been "Anything worth doing, is worth overdoing" |
|
Quoted: Quoted: to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote Hey Pussy, Bone up on American history. We have a great tradition of killing in the most brutal and inhumane ways. Our society survives. Based on you asinine statement, what is the alternative? View Quote Even though I agree with your statement, why call names? It lessens your impact and puts all of those who agree with you in the same "bad" light... |
|
When good destroys evil, good is still good.
I don't believe we "lower" ourselves to the terrorists level when we kill them by any means available. We are good, they are evil. Reguardless of how we kill them, we are still good. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote Hey Pussy, Bone up on American history. We have a great tradition of killing in the most brutal and inhumane ways. Our society survives. Based on you asinine statement, what is the alternative? View Quote Even though I agree with your statement, why call names? It lessens your impact and puts all of those who agree with you in the same "bad" light... View Quote Why? Because we are not in an academic environment. I view the general discussion board as a bunch of guy sitting around bullsh-ting. Would you prefer: Kind sir, Please review the compiled history of our nation. If you choose to, you will find many instances of our ancestors dispatching not only indigenous peoples of this land but of many other lands in a way that is most indiscriminate. Often with such brutality that is has represented a watershed. You see kind sir, although we may have approached the darker angels of our nature, we have persevered. Your statement, although sensitive in its nature, does not provide relief for the current conflict. |
|
I'm just curious...how do you think the US would have handled a situation like this?
Bradd |
|
Originally Posted By Bradd D: I'm just curious...how do you think the US would have handled a situation like this? Bradd View Quote Given the current atmosphere.. Similarly. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote Hey Pussy, Bone up on American history. We have a great tradition of killing in the most brutal and inhumane ways. Our society survives. Based on you asinine statement, what is the alternative? View Quote Even though I agree with your statement, why call names? It lessens your impact and puts all of those who agree with you in the same "bad" light... View Quote Why? Because we are not in an academic environment. I view the general discussion board as a bunch of guy sitting around bullsh-ting. Would you prefer: Kind sir, Please review the compiled history of our nation. If you choose to, you will find many instances of our ancestors dispatching not only indigenous peoples of this land but of many other lands in a way that is most indiscriminate. Often with such brutality that is has represented a watershed. You see kind sir, although we may have approached the darker angels of our nature, we have persevered. Your statement, although sensitive in its nature, does not provide relief for the current conflict. View Quote No bad feelings - it is a bunch of folks with similar interests, sharing ideas, comments, advice, jokes, and BS. But damn brother, nothing gets accomplished by calling the fella a pussy. |
|
I wonder how many civilian deaths were from bad reactions to the anasthetic and how many from gun shots
|
|
Quoted: I wonder how many civilian deaths were from bad reactions to the anasthetic and how many from gun shots View Quote Good point. I only hope that even with our better technology we could do better. In the current enviroment the public would support this. But would the government have the courage, and you know what the press would be saying. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: After the gas has had effect, first and foremost, alpha fighters destroyed the female chechens with suicide bomber belts View Quote where in the US are you gonna find 18 year old boys willing to do this kind of work? to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote Indeed. "Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you." -Nietzsche |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I wonder how many civilian deaths were from bad reactions to the anasthetic and how many from gun shots View Quote Good point. I only hope that even with our better technology we could do better. In the current enviroment the public would support this. But would the government have the courage, and you know what the press would be saying. View Quote Given our litigous society I don't think US law enforcement would use anesthesia. You can bet the family of a hostage killed by a reaction to the gas would sue anybody and everybody involved. Bradd |
|
Terminated with extreme prejudice. No mercy..
Good job Russia!!! -T. |
|
i think waco is a good point. here we just burn
everything to the ground and screw the hostages. what? there were no hostages at the compound in waco. lets not forget the children who were tormented by tear gas then burned to death. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote Hey Pussy, Bone up on American history. We have a great tradition of killing in the most brutal and inhumane ways. Our society survives. Based on you asinine statement, what is the alternative? View Quote Even though I agree with your statement, why call names? It lessens your impact and puts all of those who agree with you in the same "bad" light... View Quote Why? Because we are not in an academic environment. I view the general discussion board as a bunch of guy sitting around bullsh-ting. Would you prefer: Kind sir, Please review the compiled history of our nation. If you choose to, you will find many instances of our ancestors dispatching not only indigenous peoples of this land but of many other lands in a way that is most indiscriminate. Often with such brutality that is has represented a watershed. You see kind sir, although we may have approached the darker angels of our nature, we have persevered. Your statement, although sensitive in its nature, does not provide relief for the current conflict. View Quote No... Say exactly what you said, but don't start out with calling someone a pussy... 82ndAbn said it better than me anyway. I was over at DU and my brain was starting to melt.[puke] PS. Yeah you could say that too... If fact it is quite direct and too the point. I just feel that if we can get our points across w/o bashing each other and/or calling names, maybe the sheeples trolling here might get a different opinion of us. |
|
Given our litigous society I don't think US law enforcement would use anesthesia. You can bet the family of a hostage killed by a reaction to the gas would sue anybody and everybody involved. View Quote Oh I don't think we would use any form of CW. Both Delta and DevGru, from what I hear, HATE CW because they have to wear masks or MOPP gear and that screws up their hearing and visability when trying to clear the place. I wonder if the Russians simply pumped in NO2? That was a big place, they would have needed a large quantity of whatever. The FBI I don't think would try to gas more than a single room anymore after Waco. Hopefully they have learned to read the manufacturers instructions now if they try again, like the warning about "DO NOT USE AROUND OPEN FLAME" |
|
Quoted: Given our litigous society I don't think US law enforcement would use anesthesia. You can bet the family of a hostage killed by a reaction to the gas would sue anybody and everybody involved. View Quote Oh I don't think we would use any form of CW. Both Delta and DevGru, from what I hear, HATE CW because they have to wear masks or MOPP gear and that screws up their hearing and visability when trying to clear the place. I wonder if the Russians simply pumped in NO2? That was a big place, they would have needed a large quantity of whatever. The FBI I don't think would try to gas more than a single room anymore after Waco. Hopefully they have learned to read the manufacturers instructions now if they try again, like the warning about "DO NOT USE AROUND OPEN FLAME" View Quote I called this at work yesterday. Gas was about the only option. They wouldn't take food so you couldn't drug them that way. People who are determined to die and have rigged explosives will always win unless knocked out first. After the first breach, all it takes is one to pull the fuse igniter and bring down the house. I don't care who they are or how much they hate masks, I don't see any other options for this op. Gas is particularly subtle for Russians BTW. The biggest disadvantage is that gas is very hard on old people. I am willing to bet more casualties were from gas than gunshot, at least for those over the age of 60 I don't care |
|
Quoted: I called this at work yesterday. Gas was about the only option. They wouldn't take food so you couldn't drug them that way. People who are determined to die and have rigged explosives will always win unless knocked out first. After the first breach, all it takes is one to pull the fuse igniter and bring down the house. I don't care who they are or how much they hate masks, I don't see any other options for this op. Gas is particularly subtle for Russians BTW. The biggest disadvantage is that gas is very hard on old people. I am willing to bet more casualties were from gas than gunshot, at least for those over the age of 60 I don't care View Quote I agree. If I had a relative or friend in that theater who died as a result of the anesthesia, I'd be angry at the terrorists - not the Ruskies. Had the Reds not done anything, that relative or friend would've been killed anyway. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I called this at work yesterday. Gas was about the only option. They wouldn't take food so you couldn't drug them that way. People who are determined to die and have rigged explosives will always win unless knocked out first. After the first breach, all it takes is one to pull the fuse igniter and bring down the house. I don't care who they are or how much they hate masks, I don't see any other options for this op. Gas is particularly subtle for Russians BTW. The biggest disadvantage is that gas is very hard on old people. I am willing to bet more casualties were from gas than gunshot, at least for those over the age of 60 I don't care View Quote I agree. If I had a relative or friend in that theater who died as a result of the anesthesia, I'd be angry at the terrorists - not the Ruskies. Had the Reds not done anything, that relative or friend would've been killed anyway. View Quote Unfortunately, there are Americans who would relish the opportunity to make a buck off of a dead relative. Bradd |
|
Quoted: Quoted: to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote Hey Pussy, Bone up on American history. We have a great tradition of killing in the most brutal and inhumane ways. Our society survives. Based on you asinine statement, what is the alternative? View Quote interesting, any specific lessons you would suggest i "bone up on"? i must have picked up my liberal views from th USMC or perhaps working s a cop. 1 thing is quite obvious. you, young man have never had to take a life. and for the motivated 31 year old former 82nd, let me get this right... you actually would like to stand before GOD and say you enjoyed shooting to death a sleeping women? you guys are right, i am a pussy. thank GOD for that. now i can sleep. i can imagine that if i were killed in a war my wife would have the respect for my memory to strap explosives to her body and fight the power that took my life. i guess you guys think the American Indians were terrorist, too. |
|
Quoted: and for the motivated 31 year old former 82nd, let me get this right... you actually would like to stand before GOD and say you enjoyed shooting to death a sleeping women? View Quote No sir, I said it would tickle the shit out of me to do that. God would be proud that I sent that heathen terrorist Muslim straight to hell. |
|
Quoted: God would be proud that I sent that heathen terrorist Muslim straight to hell. View Quote 82nd does have a point here. [:D] |
|
Janet Reno would have showed them terrorist a thing or two.
Thank God that none of them were using dead man switches or electric timers that required reseting every 10 minutes or so ... boom! |
|
Originally Posted By Bradd D: I'm just curious...how do you think the US would have handled a situation like this? Bradd View Quote More than 750 hostages were freed, about 90 died. Fifty terrorists were killed: 32 men, and 18 women. View Quote I dont think we have the balls to do anything even remotely like this. Not to mention Americans cant seem to handle even a single person dying for the fight against evil let alone unarmed civilians. |
|
It was dealt with very professionally and there will be no repeat offenders.
|
|
Quoted: In the current enviroment the public would support this. But would the government have the courage, and you know what the press would be saying. View Quote Call me a cynic, but it seems to me the US press would be so focused on the type of explosives and firearms used by the terrorists - and where they were obtained - that they wouldn't get to pondering such use of force issues for some time. Adam |
|
They wouldn't have to wait for the press.
Each of the 90 victims, the dead terrorists, their surviving family members and the survivors would have been contacted by at least a dozen trial lawyers by now offering representation in a Billion $ lawsuit for wrongful damage and excessive use of force. Fortunately for the Russians, they haven't mastered that aspect of capitalism yet. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote Hey Pussy, Bone up on American history. We have a great tradition of killing in the most brutal and inhumane ways. Our society survives. Based on you asinine statement, what is the alternative? View Quote interesting, any specific lessons you would suggest i "bone up on"? i must have picked up my liberal views from th USMC or perhaps working s a cop. 1 thing is quite obvious. you, young man have never had to take a life. and for the motivated 31 year old former 82nd, let me get this right... you actually would like to stand before GOD and say you enjoyed shooting to death a sleeping women? you guys are right, i am a pussy. thank GOD for that. now i can sleep. i can imagine that if i were killed in a war my wife would have the respect for my memory to strap explosives to her body and fight the power that took my life. i guess you guys think the American Indians were terrorist, too. View Quote Lets see: You said, Quoted: to defeat the terrorist we will likely become something worse. View Quote My thesis was: We have a great tradition of killing in the most brutal and inhumane ways. My point being, we have done bad things and yet we survive. Please explain in any scenario how we could become "something worse". If we have not already become "something worse" based on our past deeds, why not? As far as lessons to bone up on look at how we fought in the past in any conflict. What could we do in the future that would be more brutal than the past? Also, nice revisionist history, I do think the native American were terrorist, by definition and their actions. Nice example of how you deal with terrorist. |
|
Seems to me that the important aspect of the way it was handled is that the terrorists gained nothing by taking hostages. We should take the same approach if/when this scenario repeats itself in the U.S.A. When the terrorists make no gains by taking hostages, the incentive to do so is taken away. I would hope that every effort to save innocent American lives is made, but we should make sure we exterminate the terrorists like so many rodents whenever and wherever they raise their ugly heads.
|
|
Quoted: Seems to me that the important aspect of the way it was handled is that the terrorists gained nothing by taking hostages. We should take the same approach if/when this scenario repeats itself in the U.S.A. When the terrorists make no gains by taking hostages, the incentive to do so is taken away. I would hope that every effort to save innocent American lives is made, but we should make sure we exterminate the terrorists like so many rodents whenever and wherever they raise their ugly heads. View Quote What he said. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.