

Quoted: To all the "guys" whining about war crimes, laws, conventions in the face of an invading country: So, if someone shot your wife in the face, then laid down their gun and surrendered, you would follow the law and wait for the police to hopefully show up and arrest them? You wouldn't be legally allowed to shoot them. View Quote If I shoot them I'm going to prison. |
|
Quoted: Yet people have surrendered to drones. And to attack helicopters (on the Highway of Death) It is disingenuous to say "you can't" when it has actually happened. Humans surrendered to a drone for the first time in 1991 . ![]() It might be "difficult", but it is possible and a legitimate action. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That's silly. You can't surrender to a drone. You can quit the fight and run towards the enemy, because you don't want to die. But asking for mercy when there's no way to safely more you across those lines isn't surrender, it's regret. It is disingenuous to say "you can't" when it has actually happened. Humans surrendered to a drone for the first time in 1991 . ![]() It might be "difficult", but it is possible and a legitimate action. No, it’s not “legitimate” in that looking up in the sky and holding up your hands in no way automatically, legally triggers your Geneva Convention protections. There would have to be a very specific set of circumstances to make it a viable and legal “surrender.” In THIS case, was this a legal “surrender”? YOU have no idea. |
|
Fuck Ukraine
Fuck Russia How many here being critical have also rooted for bombing 3 gorges dam or making glass in the middle east? I dont have the right answer. Sure it is a war crime(maybe). GD regularly tells me the U.S. doesnt have the stomach to win a war because we worry too much about killing civilians. What is the right answer? Fuck Ukraine Fuck Russia give me back all my tax money wasted there. |
|
Quoted: Quoted:
I'm sure some here will love this, but it's a war crime. "Both Russia and Ukraine are Parties to the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocols. Accordingly, they are bound by those instruments, as well as the customary international law of armed conflict." Geneva? Never heard of it. |
|
|
Quoted: Fuck Ukraine Fuck Russia How many here being critical have also rooted for bombing 3 gorges dam or making glass in the middle east? I dont have the right answer. Sure it is a war crime(maybe). GD regularly tells me the U.S. doesnt have the stomach to win a war because we worry too much about killing civilians. What is the right answer? Fuck Ukraine Fuck Russia give me back all my tax money wasted there. View Quote If it wasn't wasted on Ukraine Biden would have used it to build a wall, homes for all the homeless vets, payed off our countries debt, and fixed all the infrastructures. |
|
|
Quoted: If it wasn't wasted on Ukraine Biden would have used it to build a wall, homes for all the homeless vets, and he would have fixed all the infrastructures. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Fuck Ukraine Fuck Russia How many here being critical have also rooted for bombing 3 gorges dam or making glass in the middle east? I dont have the right answer. Sure it is a war crime(maybe). GD regularly tells me the U.S. doesnt have the stomach to win a war because we worry too much about killing civilians. What is the right answer? Fuck Ukraine Fuck Russia give me back all my tax money wasted there. If it wasn't wasted on Ukraine Biden would have used it to build a wall, homes for all the homeless vets, and he would have fixed all the infrastructures. |
|
|
|
Quoted: That's why discipline exists. When soldiers abandon their (alleged) values because the other side is brutal then there is no difference. In WWII the Red Army did that. They decided to be as brutal as the Germans. Tit for tat. In the end, both were blood drenched brutes. Both were butchers serving evil leaders. View Quote Thanks, now I need a haircut and a new ID card |
|
Quoted: How does dropping three bombs on one surrendering soldier win the war in Ukraine? This was literally a waste of munitions for the purpose of torture. He was out of the fight after the first bomb. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: GD regularly tells me the U.S. doesnt have the stomach to win a war This was literally a waste of munitions for the purpose of torture. He was out of the fight after the first bomb. He got up and ran pretty well. |
|
Quoted: Let's consider this. It seems like the argument that this was wrong goes something like this: if you're about to be blown up, you put your hands up and act like you surrender. If you're not about to be blown up, you just carry on engaging in combat operations. So you're not a fair target if your hands are up? How does that work? I need to change my magazine: I put my hands up, and I'm off limits, then I can go back to fighting when I'm done. Is that it? Is that a serious position that GD wants to defend? Where is that Tweet pointing out the impetus and purpose of Russian disinfo? View Quote Its like when the drunk pulls into his driveway. That's home base. Cops can't arrest them. |
|
OP doesn't want to post the video of the castration of a Ukrainian soldier actually in control & custody, among scores of other examples. This incident looks like nothing more than war.
|
|
|
Where are all the posts about the Russian war crimes? It’s interesting how much focus is given here when Ukraine does something wrong and the same attention is conspicuously absent notwithstanding the much greater number of horrors for which Russia is responsible (including starting this awful war in the first place)
|
|
Quoted: On camera? That's posted on social media? If I shoot them I'm going to prison. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: To all the "guys" whining about war crimes, laws, conventions in the face of an invading country: So, if someone shot your wife in the face, then laid down their gun and surrendered, you would follow the law and wait for the police to hopefully show up and arrest them? You wouldn't be legally allowed to shoot them. If I shoot them I'm going to prison. Dodge. You didn't answer the question, same as all the rest of the supporters of the Russian invasion, on here. |
|
Quoted: Where are all the posts about the Russian war crimes? It’s interesting how much focus is given here when Ukraine does something wrong and the same attention is conspicuously absent notwithstanding the much greater number of horrors for which Russia is responsible (including starting this awful war in the first place) View Quote ![]() We don't talk about Russia in a negative light unless its to say "Fuck Russia" after a multi-paragraph anti Ukraine rant to avoid being suspicious. |
|
Quoted: Ukraine tells us it is the front line, defending democracy and Western values. The account says it's not possible to surrender to a drone. Iraqis surrendered to AH-64s in 1991. And earlier this year. View Quote No they don't. They tell us they were invaded by Russia and are trying to take their country back. |
|
Surprised we haven't heard the usual crew call OP a Russian stooge or Putin cock cobbler yet.
![]() |
|
Quoted: Fuck Ukraine Fuck Russia How many here being critical have also rooted for bombing 3 gorges dam or making glass in the middle east? I dont have the right answer. Sure it is a war crime(maybe). GD regularly tells me the U.S. doesnt have the stomach to win a war because we worry too much about killing civilians. What is the right answer? Fuck Ukraine Fuck Russia give me back all my tax money wasted there. View Quote While I dont agree with the way our tax money is used...to mostly line the pockets of people like Biden under the guise of helping Ukraine, the Ukrainians are not the bad guys, here. Eastern ones....maybe. But many of them are Russian transplants. I personally know people from Ukraine. And have personal friends who have been there recently. It's a mess, for sure. But to lump the average Ukrainian who wants to defend his country against russian invasion is misguided, from my perspective. We would not want to be judged by our leader any more than those guys want to be judged by theirs. |
|
Quoted: No they don't. They tell us they were invaded by Russia and are trying to take their country back. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Ukraine tells us it is the front line, defending democracy and Western values. The account says it's not possible to surrender to a drone. Iraqis surrendered to AH-64s in 1991. And earlier this year. No they don't. They tell us they were invaded by Russia and are trying to take their country back. Ignoring the fighting that was already happening there before the invasion the ethnic cleansing and the potential to join NATO as not reasons for Russia to intervene in its borders..... Classic. |
|
Quoted: No they don't. They tell us they were invaded by Russia and are trying to take their country back. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Ukraine tells us it is the front line, defending democracy and Western values. The account says it's not possible to surrender to a drone. Iraqis surrendered to AH-64s in 1991. And earlier this year. No they don't. They tell us they were invaded by Russia and are trying to take their country back. Ignoring the fighting that was already happening there before the invasion the ethnic cleansing and the potential to join NATO as not reasons for Russia to intervene in its borders..... Classic. |
|
Quoted: I wouldn't kill like that, but I also have not had a foreign army occupy my country. View Quote I would happily kill like that if there was a foreign invasion near my home. It’s no different than if someone was trying to kick my front door in right now. I’d be waiting for them inside and it wouldn’t be with tea and crumpets. |
|
Quoted: That's why discipline exists. When soldiers abandon their (alleged) values because the other side is brutal then there is no difference. In WWII the Red Army did that. They decided to be as brutal as the Germans. Tit for tat. In the end, both were blood drenched brutes. Both were butchers serving evil leaders. View Quote I’d modify that to state that the communist Russians were already thug brutes before the Germans lowered the bar with them. Then again if the Germans are murdering and raping your civilians and POWs then they deserve no quarter. |
|
Quoted: Nuking Japan was very likely a war crime. Watch the video on YouTube that GDF made about it. View Quote ![]() |
|
So....
Imagine if this was in South carolina and we watched videos of invaders castrate one of ours. Think we would show mercy to people who bombed Charleston to rubble? For the record this was a war crime that shouldn't have happened, but let's not pretend we wouldn't have similar incidents |
|
|
|
Quoted: Are there possible "war crimes" on an invading force??? I think it's an oxymoron. Defend by all means necessary. ALL MEANS. [BTW I am not an UkeBro, but I advocate for natural law] View Quote So Iraqis couldn’t commit war crimes in 2001 ? What about ISIS burning Jordan pilots alive ? |
|
|
|
What war? Are you referring to Putins Special Military Action?
|
|
they've been doing this shit since the beginning, was so bad last summer, Ukie govt had to forbid their troops from filming and posting war crimes....
cue faded sun on how "this is just russian propaganda and not really ukies behaving like savages..." in 3....2...1....GO |
|
|
Quoted: Here I am, responding to the ArfCommies. ArfCommies never met a Russian they wouldn't hastily trip and fall down to suck off. I don't care what the Ukrainians are doing, when Russians kill Ukrainian civilians in warcrime invasion, this is what you get. Guess who is under investigation for war crimes officially? Putin. He'll eventually get what's coming to him. View Quote bet you've never actually met a commie.... under "investigation" by same cocksucker pedophiles who are persecuting Trump??? ya....great example LOL |
|
Quoted: This website was in the ether before the cosmos were created. The site is eternal. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This site has been around since the 40's? ![]() |
|
Quoted: To all the "guys" whining about war crimes, laws, conventions in the face of an invading country: So, if someone shot your wife in the face, then laid down their gun and surrendered, you would follow the law and wait for the police to hopefully show up and arrest them? You wouldn't be legally allowed to shoot them. View Quote Well if the guy was Russian probably.... |
|
War is a terrible thing. All of you kids that are pro war and or tier 1 LARPers have no idea how horrible it can be. This is but one small taste.
|
|
Quoted: How does dropping three bombs on one surrendering soldier win the war in Ukraine? This was literally a waste of munitions for the purpose of torture. He was out of the fight after the first bomb. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: GD regularly tells me the U.S. doesnt have the stomach to win a war This was literally a waste of munitions for the purpose of torture. He was out of the fight after the first bomb. He was holding his left leg and pointing to his injuries. Then he got up on his healthy legs and started to run off before the last bomb was dropped. |
|
*Putting lawyer hat on and pretending to be one*
TLDR - the "law" as it applies to this incident is about as clear as mud and open to interpretation by legal scholars Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court pdf ![]() Would anyone get prosecuted for this incident? Maybe but probably not. Would the drone operator/s get convicted if some authority did decide to prosecute? Probably not. Were the drone operators retarded in publishing this? Yup. Quoted: Let's consider this. It seems like the argument that this was wrong goes something like this: if you're about to be blown up, you put your hands up and act like you surrender. If you're not about to be blown up, you just carry on engaging in combat operations. So you're not a fair target if your hands are up? How does that work? I need to change my magazine: I put my hands up, and I'm off limits, then I can go back to fighting when I'm done. Is that it? Is that a serious position that GD wants to defend? Where is that Tweet pointing out the impetus and purpose of Russian disinfo? View Quote The text of the statute would say "having laid down his arms or having no longer means of defence, has surrendered at discretion;" - In this particular instance, would the soldier who was wounded with the first drone grenade drop, having surrendered after being wounded, no visible weapons in hand be considered as "having no longer means of defense?" Article 8, 2(B)(VI) Herein lies the problem - there was a video released recently about a Russian soldier "having surrendered" - BUT ended up chucking a grenade at the Ukrainians once they were close. Someone here for sure has a link to this video that they could probably post. That incident would violate Article 8 2(B)(IX) - "Killing or wounding treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army;" So given recent events that Ukrainian forces have legitimately experienced, there is what I would suspect some leeway in regards to accepting "surrendering enemy soldiers." This is due to the interpretation of feasibility in accepting the surrender. In this incident, was it feasible for the drone operator to accept the surrender? (edit to add - not related, but one of the interesting ones to me was the 2(B)(VIII) about the deportation of populations that Russia has for sure violated, didn't realize things about deportation of populations was specified in the statute) United States DoD Law of War Manual ![]() Oslo Manual on Select Topics of the Law of Armed Conflict ![]() |
|
Ukraine funding is already starting to stop. Wonder if Russia will call it quits when the us stops funding them as well. Been saying for a long time everything is going to continue until the funding stops then Russia wins.
|
|
Quoted: This is why you don't share war footage. Remember folks, you can't surrender to a drone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: This is why you don't share war footage. Remember folks, you can't surrender to a drone. Sure you can. There was a video where a Russian surrendered to a drone and they guided him to a surrender point. He would actually point and the drone would go up and down as a yes, or side to side as a no. Iirc the Russians were shelling him too at one point. Is the posted video cruel, yes. Is war cruel, again yes. Quoted: The US didn't machine guns Japanese sailors in the water The fuck we didn’t, it was common practice with US sub crews. There are videos on line. One commader did and they turned out to be POWs (not US, I don’t remember their country.) |
|
Quoted: Under the Geneva and Hague conventions, as well as the laws and customs of war, the bombing of Japan was a legitimate action. The US didn't machine guns Japanese sailors in the water (the Japanese did, and behead US sailors pulled from the water). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: GD: FUCK YEAH FIREBOMB THE REST OF JAPAN AND NUKE THEM AGAIN FOR GOOD MEASURE Also GD: bUt ThE mEaN uKrAiNiAn DiD a WaRcRiMe ![]() Under the Geneva and Hague conventions, as well as the laws and customs of war, the bombing of Japan was a legitimate action. The US didn't machine guns Japanese sailors in the water (the Japanese did, and behead US sailors pulled from the water). My grandfather would tell you differently on that last part. Was on the USS Sterlet for two patrols. |
|
Maybe the Russian ran over the drone operator’s kid on the way to work.
|
|
If someone invaded the US would you really consider almost anything done to them by Americans as a war crime?
|
|
Quoted: Neither sides gives a damn about the rules of war. View Quote I agree. The problem i see here is we are funding one side, and we as a nation do adhere to the rules of engagement in combat, and the Geneva convention. By extension, anyone we are supporting militarily/financially should be following those same rules. I am not for funding Ukraine in general for a lot of reasons, but since we are, then they can't be committing war crimes, regardless of what the other team is doing. |
|
Literally no different than an artillery strike hitting an area. Adjusting fire and hitting it again. Then adjusting one more time to off the stragglers.
Spotter says "They aren't done yet." and more rounds land. |
|
Quoted: If someone invaded the US would you really consider almost anything done to them by Americans as a war crime? View Quote Depending what nation the invaders are from... If they were Russians it would be mouth hugs and taint tickles. But if they are from central and south America GD wants mines, miniguns and Littlebirds and Apaches on station doing gun runs on women and children. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2023 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.