Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
11/22/2017 10:05:29 PM
Posted: 9/25/2004 9:57:18 AM EST
If this is a dupe, sorry. I haven't been able to check the site as much as I used to. Anyone think that the democrats put Kerry on the ballot because they knew he didn't stand a chance against GWB? When Kerry is defeated, we'll have 4 more years with Republicans in the White House. In 2008, my guess is the dems will put Hillary on the ballot. Could this years election be a set up for 2008? Who will the Republicans nominate in 08?
Link Posted: 9/25/2004 10:01:48 AM EST
I am sure it is, because why on earth would they nominate sKerry.
Link Posted: 9/25/2004 10:18:48 AM EST
They nominated Kerry because he was the best of a horrid bunch. simply put, they didn't have anybody better to run.
Link Posted: 9/25/2004 10:22:06 AM EST
If they had nominated Dean, and he hadn't freaked out, he might have actually had a chance. Not kerry, though. I think it's definitely a plot for hillary.
Link Posted: 9/25/2004 10:30:49 AM EST
Link Posted: 9/25/2004 2:06:11 PM EST
This is so weird. this was the family discussion last night at the family dinner table. I am sure that sKerry is there to lose. Otherwise "The Smartest Woman In The World" would have to wait until 2012 to run.

Clinton is calling the shots. IMHO.
Link Posted: 9/25/2004 2:14:29 PM EST

Originally Posted By angry_walkin_dude:

Link Posted: 9/25/2004 2:32:39 PM EST
If we can convince Rudy to run against Hitlery for the Senate in 2006, her political dreams will die. All polls show he beats her by a minimum of 10 points.
Link Posted: 9/25/2004 2:35:10 PM EST
Top Top