Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 7/20/2014 9:52:56 AM EST
This is your average unknowledgeable liberal. This same guy backtracks more than a bloodhound with a head cold, in an interview with Cam an Co.

Guess what Hunter, you fucking should have been drain baby, you prove the mother fucking point as to why this is such a polarizing debate and why gun rights advocates no longer want to have a "dialogue." Your elitist, holier than though, smug, passive aggressive attitude is the reason I cant stand to reason anymore. That, and you cant reason because your lack of critical thinking skills and emotion cloud your thought process from that walnut you call a brain.

And Hunter, I am the NRA, and my response is FOAD.

Link Posted: 7/20/2014 10:06:47 AM EST
[Last Edit: 7/20/2014 10:06:47 AM EST by Aimless]
Topic Moved
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 9:59:28 AM EST
Bump for the TLDRs
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:01:51 AM EST


Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:03:24 AM EST
My guns are perfectly safe as-is.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:04:54 AM EST
It is appropriate that Huffington Post has huffing in the title.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:06:09 AM EST
I want awesomer guns.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:06:47 AM EST
Smart guns and other such bullshit are far less safe.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:09:58 AM EST

Above, a shotgun made by the Irish company TriggerSmart, which won't fire unless its owner is wearing a companion ring.
View Quote


Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:10:43 AM EST
[Last Edit: 7/21/2014 10:11:19 AM EST by lilMAC25]
Hunter is an idiotic cunt.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:11:37 AM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SDSG:
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1917852/thumbs/o-ASDF-570.jpg?2
Above, a shotgun made by the Irish company TriggerSmart, which won't fire unless its owner is wearing a companion ring.



one ring to rule them all...
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:14:47 AM EST
The next story up, the guy calls MH17 a "crash."

So, you know...
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:15:05 AM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SDSG:
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1917852/thumbs/o-ASDF-570.jpg?2
Above, a shotgun made by the Irish company TriggerSmart, which won't fire unless its owner is wearing a companion ring.




It would take me longer to unbox it than it would to fix that malfunctioning FCG.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:16:57 AM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SDSG:
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1917852/thumbs/o-ASDF-570.jpg?2
Above, a shotgun made by the Irish company TriggerSmart, which won't fire unless its owner is wearing a companion ring.




I guess if you consider .22 shotshell a "shotgun".
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:21:38 AM EST
[Last Edit: 7/21/2014 10:22:18 AM EST by TrojanMan]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By -Tex-:
Smart guns and other such bullshit are far less safe.
View Quote


It's funny, because there's such an obvious logical test that nobody wants to apply.

Police officers carry their guns in a holster outside their belt, and are therefore rightly concerned with weapon retention. They have various types of retention holsters to address this problem, most often employing multiple redundant features which must be deactivated to access the gun.

Additionally, many police departments - for example, NYC - have selected gun features which are intended to limit the frequency of accidental discharges.

You would think those same officers would love a feature that was perfectly passive and was of no hindrance to deployment, yet positively prevented the gun from being used against them, or from discharging accidentally.

No brainer, right?

So if you want to sell smart guns, the biggest and most obvious market is police departments.


Which is funny, because right now, they're being marketed to politicians and gun control advocates.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:24:16 AM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SDSG:
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1917852/thumbs/o-ASDF-570.jpg?2
Above, a shotgun made by the Irish company TriggerSmart, which won't fire unless its owner is wearing a companion ring.



Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:25:16 AM EST
Do we really want the same dumb shits that mandated the 'spill proof' gas can to be mandating firearms safety?
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:27:14 AM EST
I think they should make safer, more compassionate criminals.






Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:36:38 AM EST
lol @ him blaming Cam and the NRA for not educating him.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:42:50 AM EST
Every Had Your Smart Phone Fail?


uh, yep.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 10:49:53 AM EST
Tag for vid at home
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 11:04:25 AM EST
You didn't bake that.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 11:09:50 AM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SDSG:
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1917852/thumbs/o-ASDF-570.jpg?2
Above, a shotgun made by the Irish company TriggerSmart, which won't fire unless its owner is wearing a companion ring.




The "new" GSG .22 cal shotgun?
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 11:19:54 AM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TrojanMan:


It's funny, because there's such an obvious logical test that nobody wants to apply.

Police officers carry their guns in a holster outside their belt, and are therefore rightly concerned with weapon retention. They have various types of retention holsters to address this problem, most often employing multiple redundant features which must be deactivated to access the gun.

Additionally, many police departments - for example, NYC - have selected gun features which are intended to limit the frequency of accidental discharges.

You would think those same officers would love a feature that was perfectly passive and was of no hindrance to deployment, yet positively prevented the gun from being used against them, or from discharging accidentally.

No brainer, right?

So if you want to sell smart guns, the biggest and most obvious market is police departments.


Which is funny, because right now, they're being marketed to politicians and gun control advocates.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TrojanMan:
Originally Posted By -Tex-:
Smart guns and other such bullshit are far less safe.


It's funny, because there's such an obvious logical test that nobody wants to apply.

Police officers carry their guns in a holster outside their belt, and are therefore rightly concerned with weapon retention. They have various types of retention holsters to address this problem, most often employing multiple redundant features which must be deactivated to access the gun.

Additionally, many police departments - for example, NYC - have selected gun features which are intended to limit the frequency of accidental discharges.

You would think those same officers would love a feature that was perfectly passive and was of no hindrance to deployment, yet positively prevented the gun from being used against them, or from discharging accidentally.

No brainer, right?

So if you want to sell smart guns, the biggest and most obvious market is police departments.


Which is funny, because right now, they're being marketed to politicians and gun control advocates.


Exactly. They should be the first to adopt that system, but strangely they keep exempting themselves from legislation.

And the line from the SF police chief about thinking about adopting the firearm for his plain clothed officers is propaganda at its finest. Its probably not even his call. Seems hes just thinking about his future in politics.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 11:21:09 AM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Buzz69:
lol @ him blaming Cam and the NRA for not educating him.
View Quote


But he still has a medium to good base of firearm knowledge and has the answer to every question. Oh dont forget unbiased.
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 11:23:37 AM EST
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 11:26:51 AM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By VA-gunnut:
Just started listening and he sounds like a sniveling little bitch.
View Quote




Link Posted: 7/21/2014 11:35:40 AM EST
His upcoming article.

Link Posted: 7/21/2014 11:43:40 AM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Buzz69:
His upcoming article.

http://i.imgur.com/aYdKCkm.jpg
View Quote


#Turninyourmancard
Link Posted: 7/21/2014 12:23:55 PM EST
Originally Posted By smithc6:
This is your average unknowledgeable liberal. This same guy backtracks more than a bloodhound with a head cold, in an interview with Cam an Co.

snip

http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Illustrated-Guide-To-Gun-Control.png
View Quote


Right-click, save as....

Love that comic
Top Top