User Panel
Posted: 4/25/2014 9:58:22 PM EDT
|
|
|
Fuck Quanell X and all his buddies.
But I do have a problem with someone being shot in the back four times. |
|
Who gives a shit. If it was black on black the nbp wouldn't give a fuck about him. I love the fake outrage that is intended for no other reason than in attempt to stir racial tensions.
|
|
Quoted:
Who gives a shit. If it was black on black the nbp wouldn't give a fuck about him. I love the fake outrage that is intended for no other reason than in attempt to stir racial tensions. View Quote Are you saying if the shooter was hispanic instead of white, and the victim was black instead of Hispanic, the shooter would be considered white? |
|
|
Entitlement mindset, people defending stupid and all gun owners hate black people.
Next news story please... |
|
What the fuck is a Quanell?
EDIT: After a search I guess its his given name. Not surprised to see this fuckstick was a crack dealer too and served jail time. Yep, lots of credibility... |
|
|
Quoted:
Fuck Quanell X and all his buddies. But I do have a problem with someone being shot in the back four times. View Quote Although probably legal in TX, 4 in the back is a little much. The Duke wasn't ever a back-shooter. But the guys did come back after threatening the guy. "We weren't going to hurt him." Yeah I'm pretty sure he should have stayed away. |
|
I just think someone showing their back isn't an immediate threat. And yes, there's undoubtedly more to the story.
But even in Texas shooting someone in the back isn't likely to go well before a jury. I'd like to know what the shooter was using that 4 hits didn't kill the guy. |
|
|
Quoted:
I just think someone showing their back isn't an immediate threat. And yes, there's undoubtedly more to the story. But even in Texas shooting someone in the back isn't likely to go well before a jury. I'd like to know what the shooter was using that 4 hits didn't kill the guy. View Quote Totality of the circumstances and all that. You know, the details that seem to have been left completely out of the news stories in the OP. Obviously Harris County decided there wasn't enough evidence to arrest on-scene so, they'll conduct an investigation and see what happens. If it was a good shoot, it's going to end there. Hell, even if he had killed the guy in a good shoot it would only cost him about 4 grand and 3 days missed work (for the Grand Jury) to walk on the charge. ETA: to address your last point: Contrary to idle gossip and popular belief, handguns are notoriously unreliable man-killers. |
|
Does Quannel Xcrement show up whenever a black shoots a white too?
|
|
Quoted:
Hell, even if he had killed the guy in a good shoot it would only cost him about 4 grand and 3 days missed work (for the Grand Jury) to walk on the charge. ETA: to address your last point: Contrary to idle gossip and popular belief, handguns are notoriously unreliable man-killers. View Quote The cool part about a good shoot is he can sue the estate to recover his losses. |
|
Quoted:
Totality of the circumstances and all that. You know, the details that seem to have been left completely out of the news stories in the OP. Obviously Harris County decided there wasn't enough evidence to arrest on-scene so, they'll conduct an investigation and see what happens. If it was a good shoot, it's going to end there. Hell, even if he had killed the guy in a good shoot it would only cost him about 4 grand and 3 days missed work (for the Grand Jury) to walk on the charge. ETA: to address your last point: Contrary to idle gossip and popular belief, handguns are notoriously unreliable man-killers. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I just think someone showing their back isn't an immediate threat. And yes, there's undoubtedly more to the story. But even in Texas shooting someone in the back isn't likely to go well before a jury. I'd like to know what the shooter was using that 4 hits didn't kill the guy. Totality of the circumstances and all that. You know, the details that seem to have been left completely out of the news stories in the OP. Obviously Harris County decided there wasn't enough evidence to arrest on-scene so, they'll conduct an investigation and see what happens. If it was a good shoot, it's going to end there. Hell, even if he had killed the guy in a good shoot it would only cost him about 4 grand and 3 days missed work (for the Grand Jury) to walk on the charge. ETA: to address your last point: Contrary to idle gossip and popular belief, handguns are notoriously unreliable man-killers. All true. Though I'd assume that 4 good hits from a 9, 40, 45 would generally do a person. Unless they were all just grazes or clipping wounds. Hell, this "victim" better get his rhythm and flow together, he be the 40 Cent. |
|
I must calibrate my Give-A-Fuck meter, no reading at this time.
Shooter needs to practice. A lot. Bad guys played stupid games with predictable results. Fuck quanell and the rest of the FSA Army kowtowing to MSM. |
|
homeowner should schedule something load and annoying for the same time.
Fuck the black panthers |
|
Quoted:
homeowner should schedule something load and annoying for the same time. Fuck the black panthers View Quote Surprised a bunch of neighbors and folks didn't come to his aid like they did with Joe Horn. Perhaps the shooter is just a douche-bag criminal, too or maybe just less likeable. Based on the dearth of pertinent information, we're left to speculate. |
|
the news doesnt say anything about the shooting victims criminal history..... hmmmmmmmmmm
also fuck quantal x or whatever the fuck that fags name is also, anyone notice the swatstica on his chest? looked like whatshisface from american history x |
|
Quoted: Surprised a bunch of neighbors and folks didn't come to his aid like they did with Joe Horn. Perhaps the shooter is just a douche-bag criminal, too or maybe just less likeable. Based on the dearth of pertinent information, we're left to speculate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: homeowner should schedule something load and annoying for the same time. Fuck the black panthers Surprised a bunch of neighbors and folks didn't come to his aid like they did with Joe Horn. Perhaps the shooter is just a douche-bag criminal, too or maybe just less likeable. Based on the dearth of pertinent information, we're left to speculate. Good citizens usually don't have Nazi tattoo's. |
|
I don't get the whole "shot in the back thing".
There obviously was a confrontation and the man thought he needed to pull his weapon. What is he supposed to do wait for him to take cover and see if he gets fired at before trying to defend himself? And the aliby "we be not haven no gats", is bs. The criminals run in packs. |
|
Quoted: Are you saying if the shooter was hispanic instead of white, and the victim was black instead of Hispanic, the shooter would be considered white? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Who gives a shit. If it was black on black the nbp wouldn't give a fuck about him. I love the fake outrage that is intended for no other reason than in attempt to stir racial tensions. Are you saying if the shooter was hispanic instead of white, and the victim was black instead of Hispanic, the shooter would be considered white? |
|
The point of law in Texas though is that you can't shoot trespassers. Not after dark, at no time.
Unless they are actively a threat or stealing / poaching / vandalizing YOUR shit you can't shoot 'em. There aren't relevant details in the story. |
|
"I did not have any weapon, and my friend did not have any weapon and I did not go to the man's house with intentions of hurting him," said Edwin Reynoso-Acevedo. View Quote Even if this statement is true, it doesn't make it a bad shoot. Making Pool think they are armed is grounds for force. So they didn't go to his house intending on hurting Pool? Just robbing him or decide when there to harm him? still good shoot. |
|
Quoted:
The point of law in Texas though is that you can't shoot trespassers. Not after dark, at no time. Unless they are actively a threat or stealing / poaching / vandalizing YOUR shit you can't shoot 'em. There aren't relevant details in the story. View Quote Wonder why those were left out, because there would be know story to cover if the details were included? |
|
Shooting someone in the back looks bad, BUT...
We do it in training demo with airsoft. I can shoot you with my back to you before you can react and pull the trigger. And I'm old and slow. |
|
Quoted:
Fortunately, not everybody takes their self-defense cues from Hollywood View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Although probably legal in TX, 4 in the back is a little much. The Duke wasn't ever a back-shooter. Fortunately, not everybody takes their self-defense cues from Hollywood Stupidity weighed heavily till reason came to the rescue. thank you. |
|
Quanell won't like the day when the NBPP gets the justice they rightfully deserve.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Surprised a bunch of neighbors and folks didn't come to his aid like they did with Joe Horn. Perhaps the shooter is just a douche-bag criminal, too or maybe just less likeable. Based on the dearth of pertinent information, we're left to speculate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
homeowner should schedule something load and annoying for the same time. Fuck the black panthers Surprised a bunch of neighbors and folks didn't come to his aid like they did with Joe Horn. Perhaps the shooter is just a douche-bag criminal, too or maybe just less likeable. Based on the dearth of pertinent information, we're left to speculate. Or has two huge fucking swastikas on his chest. That kind of gets people to not like you. |
|
Quoted:
Although probably legal in TX, 4 in the back is a little much. The Duke wasn't ever a back-shooter. But the guys did come back after threatening the guy. "We weren't going to hurt him." Yeah I'm pretty sure he should have stayed away. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Fuck Quanell X and all his buddies. But I do have a problem with someone being shot in the back four times. Although probably legal in TX, 4 in the back is a little much. The Duke wasn't ever a back-shooter. But the guys did come back after threatening the guy. "We weren't going to hurt him." Yeah I'm pretty sure he should have stayed away. Yeah, they left, then came back? Even without knowing more, they were definitely looking for trouble. They found it. |
|
Quoted:
He's holding a press conference in the shooters front yard in the video. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Fine, he can go to guy's property and get shot, too. He's holding a press conference in the shooters front yard in the video. Yeah, fuck that. get off my lawn Neighbors had a news crew arrive, and the crew thought that using my house as a backdrop would be a good idea. Glad I caught them while they were setting up. That did not last. They got booted, told not to use any of my property for any reason, and that if they stepped 1 foot off the sidewalk onto my land again, I'd have the cops there, I was watching them, and I had a camera. Tail-between-legs. |
|
Quoted:
Yeah, they left, then came back? Even without knowing more, they were definitely looking for trouble. They found it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fuck Quanell X and all his buddies. But I do have a problem with someone being shot in the back four times. Although probably legal in TX, 4 in the back is a little much. The Duke wasn't ever a back-shooter. But the guys did come back after threatening the guy. "We weren't going to hurt him." Yeah I'm pretty sure he should have stayed away. Yeah, they left, then came back? Even without knowing more, they were definitely looking for trouble. They found it. truth. If you dont live there coming back for seconds is typically a bad idea and you look like the aggressor. |
|
|
Threaten someone, leave, then return? Only two bad parts of the shoot; shootee lived and QX didn't receive any lead.
|
|
Fuck the new black panthers.
The man who fired those shots, Shannon Pool, told KHOU 11 News he and his wife were approached in their driveway by two strange men who threatened to kill them. View Quote be a drug dealer, threaten to kill someone, leave and then come back means it is a good shoot, 4 in the back or not. |
|
Blah,blah,blah, all they do is talk... Shut the fuck up already!
We all know they itch for a fight...a big 'ole fight..... Shit or get off the pot....don't talk about it be about it. Sick and tired of all the detractors on this planet. |
|
My Kimber Defender spray is for black folks, Glock for everyone else...
|
|
The property owner shot the interloper 4 times in the back?
He needs a more suitable caliber gun. |
|
Community Activist? How much does that pay? The guy who got shot learned a very valuable lesson, don't try to rob people and don't threaten to kill people while you are trying to rob them.
|
|
Quoted:
the news doesnt say anything about the shooting victims criminal history..... hmmmmmmmmmm also fuck quantal x or whatever the fuck that fags name is also, anyone notice the swatstica on his chest? looked like whatshisface from american history x View Quote Doesn't say anything about the shooter's criminal history either. Hmmm..... We also have wholly contradictory stories - one where mamma says he thought it was someone he knew, and this walked up to the car of a stranger, and another one where the two men had actually been fighting earlier. This looks like another one of those litmus tests, where derpers across the board will just "know" what happened. |
|
Captain Wally Wieghat already seems to know what happened. Notice how "he shot the suspect." Uhh, until they figure out what happened, isn't a guy who just shot somebody four times a "suspect" as well?
In before GD accuses me of white guilt. |
|
I love how the only source of information about the guy who was shot having threatened to kill the shooter, is coming form the guy who did the shooting, but it is repeated as fact by so many. This, in spite of at least one eye witness interviewed by the press.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.