I am putting together an e-mail that I will send to my family friends concerning Fred Thompson and the VT shootings. Please take a look and let me know what I should keep or change or if it even makes sense. I usually don't write stuff like this but just felt like I needed to let the people in my circle know about Fred Thompson after reading the article he wrote about VT.

Here it is:

Hello all,

As some of you know I am a big 2nd Amendment proponent and believe that it is an individual right. I have a hard time understanding the point of view that some people have when they argue that “guns should be banned”.  There is plenty of hard evidence that any normal thinking individual should be able to process and come to the conclusion that banning guns and stripping Americans of their rights is not the answer. In the wake of the tragedy at Virginia Tech we have to ask ourselves who will protect us from monsters……Will the police be there in time to save you? Will administrators make the quick decision to put the building you are in on lockdown? Are you of the mindset that this couldn’t or wouldn’t happen where you work or where your kids go to school? I am sure the 32 students at VT thought the same thing. To find out what could have been done, please read the following article by Fred Thompson:

Signs of Intelligence?
4/20/2007
Fred Dalton Thompson

One of the things that's got to be going through a lot of peoples' minds now is how one man with two handguns, that he had to reload time and time again, could go from classroom to classroom on the Virginia Tech campus without being stopped. Much of the answer can be found in policies put in place by the university itself.

Virginia, like 39 other states, allows citizens with training and legal permits to carry concealed weapons. That means that Virginians regularly sit in movie theaters and eat in restaurants among armed citizens. They walk, joke and rub shoulders everyday with people who responsibly carry firearms -- and are far safer than they would be in San Francisco, Oakland, Detroit, Chicago, New York City, or Washington, D.C., where such permits are difficult or impossible to obtain.

The statistics are clear. Communities that recognize and grant Second Amendment rights to responsible adults have a significantly lower incidence of violent crime than those that do not. More to the point, incarcerated criminals tell criminologists that they consider local gun laws when they decide what sort of crime they will commit, and where they will do so.

Still, there are a lot of people who are just offended by the notion that people can carry guns around. They view everybody, or at least many of us, as potential murderers prevented only by the lack of a convenient weapon. Virginia Tech administrators overrode Virginia state law and threatened to expel or fire anybody who brings a weapon onto campus.

In recent years, however, armed Americans -- not on-duty police officers -- have successfully prevented a number of attempted mass murders. Evidence from Israel, where many teachers have weapons and have stopped serious terror attacks, has been documented. Supporting, though contrary, evidence from Great Britain, where strict gun controls have led to violent crime rates far higher than ours, is also common knowledge.

So Virginians asked their legislators to change the university's "concealed carry" policy to exempt people 21 years of age or older who have passed background checks and taken training classes. The university, however, lobbied against that bill, and a top administrator subsequently praised the legislature for blocking the measure.

The logic behind this attitude baffles me, but I suspect it has to do with a basic difference in worldviews. Some people think that power should exist only at the top, and everybody else should rely on "the authorities" for protection.

Despite such attitudes, average Americans have always made up the front line against crime. Through programs like Neighborhood Watch and Amber Alert, we are stopping and catching criminals daily. Normal people tackled "shoe bomber" Richard Reid as he was trying to blow up an airliner. It was a truck driver who found the D.C. snipers. Statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show that civilians use firearms to prevent at least a half million crimes annually.

When people capable of performing acts of heroism are discouraged or denied the opportunity, our society is all the poorer. And from the selfless examples of the passengers on Flight 93 on 9/11 to Virginia Tech professor Liviu Librescu, a Holocaust survivor who sacrificed himself to save his students earlier this week, we know what extraordinary acts of heroism ordinary citizens are capable of.

Many other universities have been swayed by an anti-gun, anti-self defense ideology. I respect their right to hold those views, but I challenge their decision to deny Americans the right to protect themselves on their campuses -- and then proudly advertise that fact to any and all.

Whenever I've seen one of those "Gun-free Zone" signs, especially outside of a school filled with our youngest and most vulnerable citizens, I've always wondered exactly who these signs are directed at. Obviously, they don't mean much to the sort of man who murdered 32 people just a few days ago.

With the Presidential elections just around the corner we will once again have to weigh all the issues and hope that the American people do not have to vote for “the lesser of two evils” this time. There is a candidate that is making a loud noise on internet boards and the radio circuit that will definitely fill the role that this country so desperately needs. I ask you to consider Fred Thompson and to check out this website http://www.fred08.com/default.aspx and do some research on his views. America may finally have a candidate that we can all get behind.

Best regards,

Chris

Quick bump before I fire this e-mail off.

Tag for later

good, well written...  Mind if I use it?

Quoted: good, well written...  Mind if I use it?

Use it all you want. Like I said, I usually don't write these kind of things but something just came over me and felt like sending it out to people I know. If it's good enough to be passed around by others then please feel free. If it needs some changing let me know.

That's reasonable, logical, well written, and doesn't come off as preachy or histrionic. I like it!

Why does everyone mention Detroit when they talk about places where it is hard to get a permit. Michigan is a shall issue state, and the counties are the ones that handle issuing permits. Wayne County is slow, but it is not difficult to get the CPL.

Council of Foreign Relations and my tinfoil got me wondering about this thompson kat

Quoted: Council of Foreign Relations and my tinfoil got me wondering about this thompson kat

I listened to him on Hannity the other day and was very impressed. I just don't see how any other candidate could get the nod with the current state of the country.