Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 5/30/2001 10:01:45 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 5/30/2001 10:00:26 PM EDT by M15A2]
[url]http://www.consumptionjunction.com/crazycrap/view.asp?ID=4885[/url] There is some mild porn on some of the banner ads but that is not what you should be looking at. Please no flames about their ads.
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 10:19:34 PM EDT
lmao.... didnt realize u just posted this
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 10:21:27 PM EDT
Great minds think alike.
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 10:24:29 PM EDT
Man, I love Consumption Junction. Yeah I remember reading this little article about a month ago; I'm not quite sure if the pictures were edited to work with the writer's "ideas", but nevertheless it brings some light to the eyes about what really happened. Still too if-fy though. Jewbroni~
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 10:28:04 PM EDT
Yes, everyone knows the moon landing is fake and the "face on mars" is real.
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 10:28:40 PM EDT
1. Flag planting: I think the "wrong way" shadow is not really from the flag 2. Footprint: Heel & toe not evenly imprinted due to stepping 3. Flag - there appears to be a horizontal rod extending from the staff to keep it furled and I believe I heard mention of this at the time 4. No crater: How about 1/2" of dust where lander came down got scattered around the lander making a 1" thick part that he stepped in. 5. Mein Gott!! Der wind direchtion hast changed. 6. Half the hill has disappeared, too. 7. Reflection picture: Subject is kneeling or crouched. 8. Off ladder: White suits are very reflective. Could also some light be coming off the photographer's suit? 9. Unven shadows: not nearly twice the length, and it looks to me that they're not on level ground but one is near the bottom of a dip while the other is on slopeside. Geeze, I like a good conspiracy theory, but this guy has way too much spare time. Some of Art Bell's guests are way more convincing. [red][size=6]PRK
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 10:29:57 PM EDT
Originally Posted By prk: 1. Flag planting: I think the "wrong way" shadow is not really from the flag 2. Footprint: Heel & toe not evenly imprinted due to stepping 3. Flag - there appears to be a horizontal rod extending from the staff to keep it furled and I believe I heard mention of this at the time 4. No crater: How about 1/2" of dust where lander came down got scattered around the lander making a 1" thick part that he stepped in. 5. Mein Gott!! Der wind direchtion hast changed. 6. Half the hill has disappeared, too. 7. Reflection picture: Subject is kneeling or crouched. 8. Off ladder: White suits are very reflective. Could also some light be coming off the photographer's suit? 9. Unven shadows: not nearly twice the length, and it looks to me that they're not on level ground but one is near the bottom of a dip while the other is on slopeside. Geeze, I like a good conspiracy theory, but this guy has way too much spare time. Some of Art Bell's guests are way more convincing. [red][size=6]PRK
View Quote
You posted everything I was thinking.
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 10:54:46 PM EDT
I didn't even bother to go to the link as Discovery channel had a show about this 2 months ago. It really cracked me up. They were saying, "Why can't you see any stars in the photos?" Duh, that's because it's daytime. It's even brighter on the moon with no atmosphere than on earth. What I want to know is how do they explain the REFLECTORS that were left on the moon, that we bounce lasers off to this very day. Talk to any PHD Astronomy grad, chances are good they've done college experiments where they fire lasers at the moon reflectors and get a reflected light back. geez, some people will fall for anything.
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 11:16:38 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Jewbroni: Man, I love Consumption Junction. Yeah I remember reading this little article about a month ago; I'm not quite sure if the pictures were edited to work with the writer's "ideas", but nevertheless it brings some light to the eyes about what really happened. Still too if-fy though. Jewbroni~
View Quote
You can access those photos yourself on the NASA websites and find the same anomolies. The thing that sealed it for me is the air tank pack, it did a dual purpose in that is served for air supply AND conditioning, meaning that the astronauts were in direct sunlight which equates to direct radiation, they needed full body refrigeration to an extent to avoid being burned up with IR radiation. This suit would NOT have fit through the hatch dimensionally. [rail]Railgun....
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 11:24:42 PM EDT
We need our own damned theories..... 1. John McCain: Manchurian Candidate? 2. Secret HTML code sends subliminal, nearly invisible, messages from web pages to your monitor. 3. SPAM not really made of ground-up USDA prime meat 4. You're safe from reverse-text gun-control messages on AR15.com (strung out among last letters of certain words) only if you buy the $99.95 special glasses from GoatBoy 5. Bill Clinton's youthful time overseas was not really a draft-dodging vacation, but a cover story for his absence from the U.S. while leading secret counter-insurgency raids into North Vietnam. [red][size=4]PRK
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 11:25:00 PM EDT
I freely acknowledge that the moon landing was a hoax, and that the US made the Saturn V for no reason whatsoever, except to bilk the taxpaying public. Same goes for the space shuttle. It's all a big illusion. I have a pet pteradactyl.
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 11:33:47 PM EDT
Or to launch the first heavy SAT systems for cold war surveilliance. That and to kick the economy in the ass! Can you count all the technological advances since the inception of NASA? Way too many to count!! [rail]Railgun....
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 11:33:50 PM EDT
I have the same bird lizard, care to make a breeding pair?
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 11:37:52 PM EDT
Any of you guys work in the Aerospace industry? [rail]Railgun....
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 11:41:49 PM EDT
I dunno, I think it's one of those winged iguanas that checked the "preference other" box. It's holding out for a Bigfoot. You know, even if the Saturn program were a hoax, the most callously jaded soul has to admit that there is something fairly impressive about a bureacracy vomiting into the air a vehicle with a displacement equivelant to that of two WWII Gato-class subs. In a controlled manner, no less. Nope, my parents got their money's worth. Then there's the whole 29,000 lbs of fuel consumed per second. But it's all a big lie of course.
Link Posted: 5/30/2001 11:48:13 PM EDT
Whatever.... Heavy lifters needed a reason to be built then, but costs needed to be justified, why is it that the moon has been all but ignored now? They still use those heavy lifters today but not to travel to the moon only to blast heavy SAT systems into high orbit. ahhh the magic of misdirection.... [rail]Railgun....
Link Posted: 5/31/2001 12:00:01 AM EDT
Actually, I think that there are some organizations that are looking towards mining the hell out of the moon. Obviously there are some serious technical issues that have to be overcome. Japan comes to mind as one of the more interested parties, and I think that they are primarily after 1-neutron He for use in clean fusion reaction. You want to look at something whacky, check out the website www.rotaryrocket.com It doesn't have $$$$ or propulsion or shielding, so I guess that makes it a big fat MISCARRIAGE. "Hmm, how'd they decide to make that lunar mine in the shape of a swastika? Oh yeah, it's an Indo European good-luck symbol."
Link Posted: 5/31/2001 12:12:09 AM EDT
Moon landing fake? Rocket technology nonexistent? Does this mean that I can't go to Cydonia or Olympus Mons for vacation next summer? I will freely admit that there are some odd happenings in the world to-day, but I opnce worked in the laser lab at Purdue and help the astronomy department build an amateur collimator for a moonbounce experiment - which worked nicely, thank you very much. I may not go to Cydonia, but I will probably live to see it happen... FFZ
Link Posted: 5/31/2001 12:34:32 AM EDT
I seem to remember the flags were made of metal, because there is no wind on the moon and NASA wanted the image of a wind rippled flag. If it is a conspiracy a lot of people have to know. Very big secret to keep all this time.
Link Posted: 5/31/2001 5:13:25 AM EDT
Some people can see all the holes in the moon landing conspiracy, but will believe conspiracies involving NWO, UN, "Banking Cartels," etc!
Top Top